Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 61, Issue 11, December 2005, Pages 2446-2459
Social Science & Medicine

Achieving the ‘good life’: Why some people want latrines in rural Benin

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.036Get rights and content

Abstract

Nearly half the world's population lacks basic sanitation to protect their environment from human fecal contamination. Building a latrine is the first step on the sanitation ladder in developing countries where a majority of the population defecates in open or public areas. Public health programs to improve sanitation have consistently framed promotional messages in terms of fecal–oral disease prevention and largely fail to motivate changes in sanitation behavior. A qualitative consumer study using in-depth interviews with 40 household heads was carried out to explore the decision to install a pit latrine in rural Benin. The motives for installing a latrine are reported and variations across the interviews are examined. The paper asserts that at least one active drive (desire for change or dissatisfaction) from among 11 found is needed to motivate latrine adoption. Drives involved prestige, well-being, and situational goals. Health considerations played only a minor role, and had little if anything to do with preventing fecal–oral disease transmission. Drives varied with gender, occupation, life stage, travel experience, education, and wealth, and reflected perceptions of the physical and social geography of the village, linked to availability of open defecation sites, social structure, road access, and urban proximity. The results have broad implications for new messages and strategies to promote sanitation in developing countries.

Introduction

After 25 years of publicly subsidized latrine construction and public health education programs in developing countries, 2.6 billion people still have no suitable means of excreta disposal. This leads to fecal contamination of the environment, gastro-enteric infections and loss of dignity and quality of life. A target to halve the proportion of the world's population without adequate sanitation by 2015 was included in the Millennium Development Goals (United Nations, 2002). International agencies and sanitation experts have called for new demand-responsive approaches to address the sanitation gap (Cairncross (1992), Cairncross (2003); Lafond, 1995; WHO/UNICEF, 2000). If such approaches are to achieve the required growth in coverage rates, it becomes imperative that we understand what generates demand and how to motivate more households to adopt improved sanitation. Such insights into consumer behavior and demand have thus far been lacking in the sanitation and public health literature.

Consumer motivation for acquiring sanitation can be explored from several theoretical viewpoints including means-end chains (Reynolds & Gutman, 1988), belief–attitude relations (Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975), the theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1985), models of goal-oriented consumer decision-making (Bagozzi & Lee, 1999; Bettman, Johnson, & Payne, 1991; Engel, Blackwell, & Kollat, 1978), and the adoption and diffusion of innovations (Gatignon & Robertson, 1985; Rogers, 1983). The latter is particularly insightful for understanding the spread of new demand for latrines, which are innovations that replace existing defecation and excreta disposal practices for most target households and entail significant opportunity cost with respect to other purchases.

In this study, motives or reasons for latrine adoption are conceptualized as consumer drives: desires for change arising out of dissatisfaction from a perceived difference between a desired or ideal state and one's actual state or situation (Bagozzi & Lee, 1999; Engel et al., 1978). Perceived ideal states associated with acquiring a latrine reflect personal goals and values (individual lifestyle) while actual states are determined by the physical and social environment related to current defecation practices of relevance to these goals and values (Fig. 1). The dissonance between the two states combined with sufficient positive awareness of latrines leads to aroused motivation for a latrine. Active drives are an essential but not sufficient condition for creating demand for sanitation, as opportunity and ability to acquire sanitation, including the resources and transactions needed to translate desire for a latrine into a functioning installation, must also be present.

This paper presents a study of consumer motivation for installing a household latrine in the Republic of Benin, West Africa, using Fig. 1 as a framework to answer the question: who wants sanitation and why? Exploratory in-depth interviews with 40 heads of household were carried out as the first task of a larger study of sanitation demand (Jenkins, 1999). Information was gathered about the motives and barriers of latrine adoption, and beliefs, attitudes, and experiences related to latrines. The results shed light on the behavior and motives of sanitation consumers in developing countries and point to demand-responsive strategies related to message framing, population targeting, and other marketing approaches to accelerate the adoption of improved sanitation.

Section snippets

Study site

The study was carried out in seven villages in the rural areas surrounding the twin towns of Abomey-Bohicon in Zou Department in fall 1995. This region is the heartland of the Fon ethnic group and voodoo religion in Benin, with low income and poor access to social services. The majority of the rural population is engaged in semi-subsistence agriculture, while commerce, skilled crafts and trades, and cottage industries are other important occupations. Migration and travel within Benin and abroad

Results

Eleven distinct drives for latrine adoption emerged from the analysis and have been grouped into three categories: (1) prestige-related, (2) well-being, and (3) situational. In the following presentation, each drive is described, followed by an examination of differences among the 40 informants. Detailed beliefs and attitudes accompanying each drive are provided in Table 2.

Discussion

The results establish a perception emerging from earlier work that sanitation consumers often have motives which have little or nothing to do with health protection or a healthier environment, and much more to do with prestige (Cotton, Franceys, Pickford, & Saywell, 1995; Elmendorf, 1980; Goodhart, 1988; Murthy, Goswami, Narayanan, & Amar, 1990; Perrett, 1983). In rural Benin, prestige or status conferred by latrine ownership comes from their symbolic ability to display an owner's affiliation

Acknowledgements

This study was conducted as part of research by the lead author supported by a US National Science Foundation Doctoral Fellowship. Assistance in Benin was provided by the UNICEF Office in Cotonou and the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Benin. The manuscript was finalized with support from The Hygiene Centre at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and benefited from editorial review by Sandy Cairncross and the comments of two anonymous reviewers. Jay Lund and Pat Mokhtarian

References (39)

  • I. Ajzen

    From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior

  • Alihouhou, E., Capo-chichi, V., & Kanhonou, L. (1995). Projet de Recherche Opérationnelle sur les Comportments...
  • E.J. Arnould

    Toward a broadened theory of preference formation and the diffusion of innovations: Cases from Zinder Province, Niger Republic

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (1989)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Consumer resistance to, and acceptance of, innovations

    Advances in Consumer Research

    (1999)
  • J. Bettman et al.

    Consumer decision making

  • Cairncross, S. (1992). Sanitation and water supply: Practical lessons from the decade. Water and Sanitation Discussion...
  • S. Cairncross

    Sanitation in the developing world; current status and future solutions

    International Journal of Environmental Health Research

    (2003)
  • A. Corbin

    The foul & the fragrant: Odour and the social imagination

    (1996)
  • A. Cotton et al.

    On-plot Sanitation in low income urban communities: A review of literature

    (1995)
  • V. Curtis et al.

    Dirt, disgust and disease: Is hygiene in our genes?

    Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

    (2001)
  • Degbelo, A. (1995). Personal communication with Dr. Degbelo, Historian/Anthropologist at the Centre Beninios de...
  • M. Douglas

    Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo

    (1966)
  • M. Douglas et al.

    The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumption

    (1978)
  • J.F. Engel et al.

    Consumer behavior

    (1978)
  • E. Erikson

    Identity and the life cycle

    (1959)
  • M. Fishbein et al.

    Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research

    (1975)
  • H. Gatignon et al.

    A propositional inventory for new diffusion research

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (1985)
  • Goodhart, L. (1988). Lessons for social feasibility studies in rural sanitation in four Indian regions. UNDP Project...
  • Cited by (200)

    • Acceptability of urine diversion dry toilets in Dollo Ado refugee camp, Ethiopia

      2021, International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text