Illness careers and continuity of care in mental health services: A qualitative study of service users and carers
Introduction
Continuity of care has become an important aim of health policy and service delivery (Department of Health, 1990, Department of Health, 1995, Department of Health, 2001) as well as a key criterion for service evaluation (Johnson, Prosser, Bindman, & Szmukler, 1997). Yet, it is generally agreed that the concept has lacked systematic definition (Crawford, Jonge, Freeman, & Weaver, 2004; Freeman, Shepperd, Robinson, Ehrich, & Richards, 2000) and, as Haggerty et al. (2003) emphasise, without clear definitions policy solutions are likely to remain elusive. Early conceptualisations of continuity of care tended to equate it with continuous care by the same person or persons. Over time this gave way to a view of continuity as involving the coordination of the patient's progress through the system (Adair et al., 2003). By the early 1990s it began to be seen as a potential measure of system-level reform.
In recent years research on continuity has proliferated in a variety of health care settings. Operationalising the concept has proved difficult and in relation to mental health services researchers have highlighted differences in continuity at discharge (Sytema & Burgess, 1999; Sytema, Micciolo, & Tansella, 1997); as well as cross-boundary continuity between primary and secondary care (Bindman et al., 1997), psychiatric and emergency services (Heslop, Elsom, & Parker, 2000), and inpatient and community settings (Kopelowicz, Wallace, & Zarate, 1998). Others have focused on particular features of care including: ‘a sustained patient–physician partnership’ (Nutting, Goodwin, Flocke, Zyzanski, & Stange, 2003); maintenance of contact, consistency in the member of staff seen and success of transfer between services (Johnson et al., 1997); and ‘adequate access to care… good interpersonal skills, good information flow and uptake between providers and organizations, and good care coordination’ (Reid, Haggerty, & McKendry, 2002). Discontinuity has been defined as gaps in care (Cook, Render, & Woods, 2000). A systematic review of the literature found that continuity of care has been defined in terms of service delivery, accessibility, relationship base and individualized care (Joyce et al., 2004). In contrast, qualitative studies have found that service users emphasise the importance of building a long-term relationship with a professional and express frustration at having to repeatedly review their medical histories during transitional periods (Kai & Crosland, 2001). And while there are apparent differences between professionals' and service users' views over what constitutes continuity and the most appropriate sites for care, users describe having to engage in tactics such as ‘acting up’ in order to gain appropriate services (Lester, Tritter, & Sorohan, 2005). Reviews of continuity of care studies have linked the lack of clarity in its conceptualisation and operationalisation to a deficit of user involvement (Freeman et al., 2000, Ware et al., 1999). In response, researchers have proposed a ‘multi-axial definition’ of continuity of care for mental health comprising: experienced, cross-boundary, flexible, information, relational, contextual, long-term and longitudinal (Freeman, Weaver, Low, de Jonge, & Crawford, 2002). Others have emphasised that continuity of care is best understood as a multidimensional concept (Bachrach, 1981). Here researchers have combined factors such as breaks in service delivery with the experience of care, maintenance of contact, consistency in the member of staff seen, transition and integration between services, adherence to service plans, and management of service users' needs (Crawford et al., 2004, Johnson et al., 1997). Domains of continuity have been proposed including: knowledge, flexibility, availability, coordination and transitions (Ware, Dickey, Tugenberg, & McHorney, 2003). These approaches, coupled with a view of continuity as involving the coordination of the patient's progress through the system (Adair et al., 2003), resonate strongly with the notion of a patient career.
In this paper we utilise the concept of the ‘patient career’ to frame patient accounts of their experiences of the mental health care system. We follow Hughes's (1937) definition of a career as a series of movements between stages in a sequence and its use in relation to patient experiences in mental health institutions (Goffman, 1970). A number of studies have utilised the concept in mental health settings to highlight the relationships that are formed and changed as individuals negotiate the system (Gove, 2004), and the changes that occurred to patient pathways as a consequence of de-institutionalisation (Pavalko, Harding, & Pescosolido, 2007). As Pescosolido (1991) argues, individuals negotiate illness career pathways drawing on social networks and ties in the context of their social location and their health beliefs and the study of such illness careers requires longitudinal, multi-method and analytically flexible approaches. In this study we aimed to capture the experiences and views of users and carers focusing on the meanings associated with particular (dis)continuities and transitional episodes that occurred over their illness career. The interviews explored general experiences of relationship with services, care, continuity and transition from both user and carer perspectives.
Section snippets
Methods
As part of a large longitudinal study of continuity of care in mental health, 180 service users diagnosed with long-term psychotic disorders and 98 service users diagnosed with non-psychotic disorders were sampled from the caseloads of seven Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) covered by two mental health trusts (Burns et al., 2009). CMHTs are multi-disciplinary teams in which the care of each patient is managed by a key worker (who might be a community psychiatric nurse, occupational
Findings
Five key themes emerged: relational (dis)continuity; depersonalised transitions; invisibility and crisis; communicative gaps and social vulnerability. One of the important findings was the fragility of continuity and its relationship to levels of satisfaction. Supportive, long-term relationships could be quickly undermined by a range of factors and satisfaction levels were often closely related to moments of transition where these relationships were vulnerable.
Discussion
A number of caveats should be noted as we consider the findings. The interviews were based on service users' and carers' recall of events, some of which were recent while others were not. Recall bias and discrepancies are therefore likely to occur and present problems in terms of accuracy and reliability (Pescosolido & Wright, 2004). The generalisability of the findings should be considered with caution (Payne & Williams, 2005). In particular the experiences of individuals in other parts of the
Conclusion
This study examined continuity of care from the perspective of service users and carers using participant accounts of illness careers as a way of identifying key moments where continuity might be threatened. An important finding is the apparent fragility of continuity and its relationship to levels of satisfaction. Supportive, long-term relationships could be quickly undermined by a range of factors (including the social context in which users lived their lives). Satisfaction levels were often
Acknowledgements
We also acknowledge the contributions of the following individuals as part of the ECHO Group: Developmental phase; Diana Rose (IOP, London), Til Wykes (IOP, London), Angela Sweeney (IOP, London); Organizational strand: Susan McLaren (London South Bank University), Ruth Belling (London South Bank University), Jonathon Davies (London South Bank University), Ferew Lemma (London South Bank University), Margaret Whittock (Kingston University), Main phase; Tom Burns (University of Oxford), Jocelyn
References (43)
- et al.
Collecting retrospective data: accuracy of recall after 50 years judged against historical records
Social Science & Medicine
(1997) - et al.
The view from two worlds: the convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties
Social Science & Medicine
(2004) - et al.
History and measurement of continuity of care in mental health services and evidence of its role in outcomes
Psychiatric Services
(2003) Continuity of care for chronic mental users: a conceptual analysis
American Journal of Psychiatry
(1981)Get back to your ward
- et al.
Integration between primary and secondary services in the care of the severely mentally ill: patients' and general practitioners' views
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1997) - et al.
Continuity of care in mental health: understanding and measuring a complex phenomenon
Psychological Medicine
(2009) - et al.
Gaps in the continuity of care and progress on patient safety
British Medical Journal
(2000) - et al.
Providing continuity of care for people with severe mental illness
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
(2004) The Care Programme Approach for people with a mental illness referred to the Special Psychiatric Services
(1990)
Building bridges: A guide to arrangements for inter-agency working for the care and protection of severely mentally ill people
National service framework for mental health: Modern standards and service models
Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide
Transition: Moving on well
Continuity of care: Report of a scoping exercise for the SDO programme of NHS R&D
Promoting continuity of care for people with severe mental illness whose needs span primary, secondary and social care
Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates
Protecting the vulnerable; a reanalysis of our social responsibilities
The career of the mentally ill: an integration of psychiatric, labelling/social construction, and lay perspectives
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review
British Medical Journal
Cited by (64)
Effects of connection-based physician-patient relationships on perceptions of outcome: A vignette experiment
2023, Patient Education and CounselingCoercion and power in psychiatry: A qualitative study with ex-patients
2019, Social Science and MedicineOpinions of key stakeholders concerning involuntary admission of patients under the Mental Health Act 2001
2017, Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine