Moving towards universal health insurance in China: Performance, issues and lessons from Thailand

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

China is now in the course of implementing a new round of health system reforms. Universal health insurance coverage through the basic social medical insurance system is high on the reform agenda. This paper examines the performance of China’s current social medical insurance system in terms of revenue collection, risk pooling, the benefit package, and provider payment mechanisms based on a literature review and publicly available data. On the basis of critical assessment, the paper attempts to address the issues challenging China as it moves towards universal coverage. Focusing in particular on the reform experience in Thailand as it implemented universal coverage, the following policy implications for further reform in China are articulated, taking into account China’s particular circumstances: firstly, the gaps in the benefit package across different schemes should be further reduced; secondly, the prevailing fee-for-service payment system needs to be transformed; thirdly, the primary health care delivery and referral system needs to be strengthened in coordination with the reform of the health insurance system; and fourthly, raising the risk pooling level and integrating fragmented insurance schemes should be long-run objectives of reform.

Highlights

► Contributes to an improved understanding of China’s medical insurance system. ► Addresses the issues challenging China as it moves towards universal coverage. ► Focuses in particular on the reform experience in Thailand. ► Policy implications for further reform in China are articulated.

Introduction

As the largest developing country in the world, China has been facing substantial challenges to serve its population of 1.3 billion with equitable, affordable and high-quality health services over the past several decades. The performance of the Chinese health system, and the reforms that have been implemented, have attracted broad and intense interest worldwide. China’s health system, once revered by other countries in the early decades after the founding of the People’s Republic of China, has increasingly been criticized for its poor efficiency in health care delivery, inequity in utilization and access to health services, and cost escalation (Eggleston et al., 2008, Wagstaff et al., 2009). Specifically, health care has become a leading and serious national concern. The general public has expressed its discontent with unaffordable access and medical impoverishment through thousands of organized protests throughout the country, receiving frequent media attention (Yip & Hsiao, 2008). With the failures of past reforms and the present policy goals of building a harmonious society, the Chinese government has recognized its responsibility to address these concerns and is launching a new wave of health system reform.

The performance of the health insurance system, which dominates health care financing and payment in China, deserves greater attention in the current context. Through a number of difficult reforms and policy changes in the past decades, China’s basic social medical insurance system, which includes the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance system (UEBMI), the New Rural Cooperative Medical System (NRCMS) and the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance system (URBMI), has been developed and is expanding rapidly. Although commercial medical insurance exists, it still accounts for a small proportion of the population covered and is purchased mainly by the upper echelon population at present (Wang, 2009). Under the new health plan announced in April 2009, the Chinese government promulgated the goal of achieving universal insurance coverage by the basic social medical insurance system by 2011 (Chen, 2009).

Although China’s basic social medical insurance system nominally covers everyone across the country and is moving towards realization of the objective of universal insurance coverage, the performance of this system needs to be carefully considered and critically evaluated. On the basis of such an appraisal, the intrinsic strengths and weaknesses in institutional design and possible initiatives for further reform of the system can be identified. The experiences of health insurance system reform in other countries may also present useful insights for China’s ongoing reform. As an example, Thailand has made impressive strides towards universal coverage, sparking considerable interest worldwide and potentially providing lessons for China (Tangcharoensathien, Prakongsai, Limwattananon, Patcharanarumol, & Jongudomsuk, 2007).

This paper first appraises the performance of China’s social medical insurance system using available scholarly literature and relevant data from the official web pages of the government, thereby elucidating the current issues confronting the system. The paper employs an analytical framework that has been widely adopted for assessing health care financing mechanisms, first proposed by World Health Organization (WHO) in its evaluation of the world’s health systems in 2000 (WHO, 2000). The framework focuses on four key functions that a financing mechanism must perform: revenue collection, risk pooling, the design of the benefit package, and provider payment mechanisms. The paper then examines the health insurance reform experiences in Thailand with respect to the objective of universal coverage and attempts to draw out some lessons for China, taking into account China’s practical context.

Section snippets

Revenue collection

UEBMI is an employment-based compulsory medical insurance program designed for urban employees from the public and private sectors and financed jointly by employers and employees from payroll tax. The guideline established by State Council suggests premium contributions by employers and employees be set at 6% and 2% of an employee’s salary, respectively. Total premium revenue is distributed into two different accounts, namely a Medical Savings Account (MSA) and a Social Pooling Account (SPA),

Potential challenges to universal coverage

Under current health insurance arrangements in China, every citizen across the country should be covered in principle. However, special attention should be drawn to urban informal sector workers. With the changing economic structure and accelerating urbanization in China, the fraction of the population accounted for by urban informal sector workers has been increasing and reached approximately 40% of the urban population by late 2007 (Ministry of Human Resource and Social Security and National

Lessons and policy implications from a comparative perspective

Health financing and insurance reform is a systematic, long-term challenge which is not unique to China but rather confronts many other countries. The successful experiences from other countries, especially developing countries, may provide invaluable lessons for China. Thailand has implemented health insurance reform aimed at achieving universal coverage in the past decade and has achieved its policy objectives of improving the equity and efficiency of its health system with sustainable health

Conclusions

This paper contributes to a critical evaluation and improved understanding of the present performance of China’s basic social medical insurance system. Following an illumination of the current issues challenging China on its path towards universal coverage, the useful lessons for China provided by experiences in Thailand have been addressed. With the strong political will and powerful mobilization capability of the Chinese government, the realization of universal insurance coverage within the

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the financial support from Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 70873131) and State Scholarship Council for this research. The authors also would like to acknowledge Dr Jie Tang, Dr Yuhua Shi and other anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the early version of this paper.

References (58)

  • H. Wang

    A dilemma of Chinese healthcare reform: how to re-define government roles?

    China Economic Review

    (2009)
  • H. Wang et al.

    Adverse selection in a voluntary rural mutual health care insurance scheme in China

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2006)
  • M. Whitehead et al.

    Equity and health sector reforms: can low income countries escape the medical poverty trap?

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Community health service centers in China, not always trusted by the populations they serve?

    China Economic Review

    (2009)
  • W. Yip et al.

    Addressing government and market failures with payment incentives: hospital reimbursement reform in Hainan, China

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2004)
  • W. Yip et al.

    Non-evidence-based policy: how effective is China’s new cooperative medical scheme in reducing medical impoverishment?

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2009)
  • W. Yip et al.

    Realignment of incentives for health-care providers in China

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • X. You et al.

    The New cooperative medical scheme in China

    Health Policy

    (2009)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Dynamic process of adverse selection: evidence from a subsidized community-based health insurance in rural China

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2008)
  • T. Bärnighausen et al.

    Willingness to pay for social health Insurance among informal sector workers in Wuhan, China: a contingent valuation study

    BMC Health Service Research

    (2007)
  • D. Blumenthal et al.

    Privatization and its discontents — the evolving Chinese health care system

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (2005)
  • P.H. Brown et al.

    The New Cooperative Medical System: dose it help farmers with health shocks maintaining living standards?

    China Labor Economics

    (2009)
  • G. Carrin et al.

    Social health insurance: key factors affecting the transition towards universal coverage

    International Social Security Review

    (2005)
  • K. Damrongplasit et al.

    Early results from Thailand’s 30 Baht Health Reform: something to smile about

    Health Affairs

    (2009)
  • T. Doran et al.

    Pay-for-Performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom

    The New England Journal of Medicine

    (2006)
  • K. Eggleston et al.

    Health service delivery in China: a literature review

    Health Economics

    (2008)
  • M. Gao

    Reflection on sustainability of New cooperative medical scheme from demand

    Health Economics Research

    (2004)
  • M. Gu et al.

    Analysis of typical issues about medical insurance for free employees

    Chinese Health Service Management

    (2006)
  • S. Hanucharurnkul

    Nurses in primary care and the nurse practitioner role in Thailand

    Contemporary Nurse

    (2007)
  • Cited by (65)

    • The impacts of multiple healthcare reforms on catastrophic health spending for poor households in China

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In some health systems, SHI is predominantly jointly financed by employers and employees with limited state intervention while in other systems the state plays a more assertive role by providing subsidies and managing the fund through administrative or quasi-administrative institutions (Hsiao and Shaw, 2007). It was envisaged that moving towards SHI would achieve universal health coverage (UHC) for the vast uninsured population while controlling provider behaviors through third-party purchasing (Hsiao and Shaw, 2007; Li et al., 2011; Obermann et al., 2006). The past three decades have seen the establishment and expansion of SHI in many countries, such as Vietnam (1992), Nigeria (1999), the People's Republic of China (1998), Thailand (2001), and India (2018).

    • A realist review to assess for whom, under what conditions and how pay for performance programmes work in low- and middle-income countries

      2021, Social Science and Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      We identified 38,234 records and screened 374 papers for the full-text review (Fig. 4). Finally, 117 records ((Ssengooba et al., 2012), (Anselmi et al., 2017a), (Engineer et al., 2016; Berman, 2015; Celhay et al., 2015; Gertler and Giovagnoli, 2014; Rubinstein et al., 2009; Rahman et al., 2017; Rob and Alam, 2013; Bowser et al., 2013; Antony et al., 2017; Lagarde et al., 2015; Bertone and Meessen, 2013), (Bonfrer et al., 2014a, 2014b; Falisse et al., 2012, 2015; Rudasingwa et al., 2015; Ir et al., 2015; Jacobs et al., 2010; Khim et al., 2018; Matsuoka et al., 2014; Van de Poel et al., 2016), (De Walque et al., 2017; Zang et al., 2015; Ding et al., 2013; Fan, 2017; Li et al., 1982; Liu and Mills, 2005; Millar et al., 2017a; Powell-Jackson et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2011), (Wu, 2014; Yao et al., 2008; Yip and Eggleston, 2001; Yip et al., 2010, 2014; Zhang et al., 2017a; Cercone et al., 2005; Hindle and Kalanj, 2004; Fox et al., 2014; Huillery and Seban, 2017), (Soeters et al., 2011a; Zeng et al., 2013, 2018; Bernal et al., 2018; Mohanan et al., 2019; Singh and Masters, 2017; Chernichovsky and Bayulken, 1995; Aryankhesal et al., 2013, 2015; Sarikhani and Lankarani, 2013), (Menya et al., 2015; Saleh et al., 2013; Morgan, 2011; Lohmann et al., 2017; McMahon and De Allegri, 2016; McMahon et al., 2016, 2018; Wilhelm et al., 2016; Schuster et al., 2016, 2018), (Barnes et al., 2014; Duysburgh et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2014; Regalía and Castro, 2007; Bhatnagar and George, 2016; Ogundeji et al., 2016; Witter et al., 2011; Peabody et al., 2011, 2014, 2017), (Wagner et al., 2018; Basinga, 2009; Basinga et al., 2010, 2011; de Walque et al., 2015; Gertler and Vermeersch, 2012; Janssen et al., 2015; Kalk et al., 2010; Kantengwa et al., 2010; Lannes, 2015; Lannes et al., 2016; Meessen et al., 2006, 2007b; Ngo et al., 2017; Priedeman Skiles et al., 2012; Rusa et al., 2009; Shapira et al., 2017; Sherry et al., 2017; Skiles et al., 2015; Bertone et al., 2016), (Bertone and Witter, 2015; Binyaruka and Borghi, 2017; Binyaruka et al., 2015b, 2018a; Borghi et al., 2015; Chimhutu et al., 2014, 2015, 2016; Mayumana et al., 2017a; Olafsdottir et al., 2014), (Songstad et al., 2012; Gormus, 2015; Miller et al., 2014; Chansa et al., 2015; Friedman et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2017; Vergeer and Chansa, 2008; Feldacker et al., 2017; World Bank. Rewarding Pro, 2016; Bodson et al., 2018; Paul et al., 2018; Paul et al., 2014; Turcotte-Tremblay et al., 2018; Turcotte-Tremblay et al., 2017)) met the inclusion criteria comprising of 19 grey literature and 98 peer-reviewed articles. The included studies assessed P4P schemes in 36 countries, across Sub-Saharan Africa (n = 23 countries), Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 6 countries), East Asia and the Pacific (n = 4 countries), South Asia (n = 4 countries), the Middle East and North Africa (n = 2 countries), and Europe and Central Asia (n = 2 countries) (Fig. 5).

    • How Far Have We Come? Challenges to Orphan Drug Access in China, 2011-2017

      2019, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, except for authorization to reduce the sample size of clinical trials39 and qualification for special review, there have been no financial subsidies for orphan drugs R&D and generic use in China. Finally, addressing responsibility, multiple sources of fund-raising such as medical assistance, social welfare charity, and patient advocacy organizations may help ease the financial burden of patients with rare diseases, as the experience of Thailand indicates.40 Optimal copayment designs for orphan drugs have been explored in some provinces in China, but an operation mechanism at the national level is still urgently needed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text