Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 74, Issue 4, February 2012, Pages 554-564
Social Science & Medicine

Determinants, self-management strategies and interventions for hope in people with mental disorders: Systematic search and narrative review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Developing a recovery focus in mental health services is a policy goal internationally, and hope is a central component of recovery. Yet determinants of hope of people with mental disorders are not well known, nor are strategies and interventions that increase hope. This study aims to systematically summarise the available evidence to fill four relevant knowledge gaps: (1) hope scales used in psychiatric research, (2) determinants of hope, (2) hope-fostering self-management strategies, and (3) interventions to increase hope for people with mental disorders. We conducted a systematic literature search in April 2011 and a narrative synthesis of publications including qualitative and quantitative studies. Results for the first time provide a comprehensive overview of existing evidence and identify important scientific knowledge gaps: (1) Hope scales used do slightly vary in focus but are overall comparable. (2) Most published research used cross-sectional designs resulting in a high number of potential determinants of hope. No studies prospectively investigated the influence of these determinants. (3) Hope fostering self-management strategies of people with mental disorders were described in qualitative studies only with experimental studies completely missing. (4) While some recovery oriented interventions were shown to increase hope as a secondary outcome, there are no successful interventions specifically aimed at increasing hope. This review provides the basis for both practical and research recommendations: The five most promising candidate interventions to improve hope in people with mental disorders are (i) collaborative strategies for illness management, (ii) fostering relationships, (iii) peer support, (iv) helping clients to assume control and to formulate and pursue realistic goals, and (v) specific interventions to support multiple positive factors such as self-esteem, self-efficacy, spirituality and well-being. These may serve to directly improve care and to develop theory-based models and testable interventions to improve hope in mental health as well as in allied fields.

Highlights

►Identifies relevant determinants, self-management strategies and interventions to increase hope in psychiatric practice. ► Specific components of recovery oriented programmes and positive psychology interventions improve hope. ► Self-management strategies can be used as components of interventions to successfully increase and maintain hope. ► Hope can be improved successfully in people with mental illness.

Section snippets

Background

Hope has been a relevant topic in mythology, philosophy and religion for centuries. However, it was only in the 1950s when Menninger (1959) identified it as integral to the profession of psychiatry, important for initiating therapeutic change, willingness to learn and personal well-being. Since then, a wealth of research has been conducted investigating hope in various medical fields and different settings (Castañeda et al., 2010, Lalor et al., 2009, Rhodes et al., 2009), but particularly in

Data sources

We searched twelve bibliographic databases from inception (bracketed): AMED (1985); British Nursing Index (1985); EMBASE (1947); MEDLINE (1946); PsycINFO (1806); Social Science Policy (1890); CINAHL (1981); International Bibliography of Social Science (1951); British Humanities Index (1962); Sociological abstracts (1952); and Social Services abstracts (1979). The reference lists of all included studies, relevant reviews and opinion papers were hand searched for additional relevant papers.

Results

Study selection is shown in Fig. 1.

Characteristics of the 57 included studies are shown in Online Data Supplement 2. Eight were qualitative, and were used in all Aims. Of the 49 quantitative studies, 35 used cross-sectional designs (reported within review Aim 2) and 16 were prospective (9 fitting review Aim 2 and 8 review Aim 4). The 149 relevant review and opinion papers were used for hand search only and are summarised in Online Data Supplement 2.

Discussion

In this systematic review and narrative synthesis we bring together a wide range of quantitative and qualitative data on potential determinants of hope, self-management strategies and interventions that might serve to improve hope in people with mental disorders. Given the increasing theoretical importance of hope, particularly in positive approaches to mental health, research on this topic has substantially increased in recent years as reflected by the rising number of studies meeting our

Clinical implications

The results of this review suggest at least five promising elements that may be included in future interventions specifically designed to enhance hope of people with mental disorders: (i) collaborative strategies for illness management, including medication, (ii) a focus on fostering relationships both with staff and people outside the mental health system, (iii) facilitating connections with peers, particularly peer support, (iv) helping clients to assume control and to formulate and pursue

References (87)

  • C. Noh et al.

    Hope from the perspective of people with schizophrenia (Korea)

    Archives of Psychiatric Nursing

    (2008)
  • A.D. Ong et al.

    Hope as a source of resilience in later adulthood

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2006)
  • T. Rhodes et al.

    Medical promise and the recalibration of expectation: hope and HIV treatment engagement in a transitional setting

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2009)
  • D.L. Udelman et al.

    A preliminary report on anti-depressant therapy and its effects on hope and immunity

    Social Science & Medicine

    (1985)
  • B. Williams et al.

    Perceptions of illness causation among new referrals to a community mental health team: "explanatory model" or "exploratory map"?

    Social Science & Medicine

    (2001)
  • R. Andresen et al.

    Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness

    Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • G. Andrews et al.

    Classification in psychiatry: ICD-10 versus DSM-IV

    Br J Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • S. Barbic et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a modified recovery workbook program: preliminary findings

    Psychiatric Services

    (2009)
  • D. Becker et al.

    Positive psychology. History in the remaking?

    Theory & Psychology

    (2008)
  • K. Bollen et al.

    Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1991)
  • S. Bonney et al.

    Recovery and mental health: a review of the British literature

    Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

    (2008)
  • C. Brown et al.

    Correlates of insider and outsider conceptualizations of recovery

    Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

    (2008)
  • K. Buckley-Walker et al.

    Exploring identity within the recovery process of people with serious mental illnesses

    Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

    (2010)
  • J. Cheavens et al.

    Hope therapy in a community sample: a pilot investigation

    Social Indicators Research

    (2006)
  • R. Chiba et al.

    Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the self-identified stage of recovery for people with long term mental illness

    International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

    (2010)
  • S.P. Clarke et al.

    The role of symptom distress and goal attainment in promoting aspects of psychological recovery for consumers with enduring mental illness

    Journal of Mental Health

    (2009)
  • J.A. Cook et al.

    Initial outcomes of a mental illness self-management program based on wellness recovery action planning

    Psychiatric Services

    (2009)
  • P. Corrigan et al.

    Religion and spirituality in the lives of people with serious mental illness

    Community Mental Health Journal

    (2003)
  • P.W. Corrigan et al.

    Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (2004)
  • E.L. Cowen et al.

    “Positive Psychology”: some plusses and some open issues

    Journal of Community Psychology

    (2002)
  • P. Craig et al.

    Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • J.J. Crowson et al.

    Hostility and hope in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: a look back at combat as compared to today

    Cognitive Therapy and Research

    (2001)
  • M. Csikszentmihalyi

    The promise of positive psychology

    Psychological Topics

    (2009)
  • Y. Darlington et al.

    Strategies for encouraging and maintaining hope among people living with serious mental illness

    Australian Social Work

    (1999)
  • I.L. Fowler et al.

    Patterns of current and lifetime substance use in schizophrenia

    Schizophrenia Bulletin

    (1998)
  • S. Fukui et al.

    Effect of wellness recovery action plan (wrap) participation on psychiatric symptoms, sense of hope, and recovery

    Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

    (2001)
  • J.Q. Hodges et al.

    Predictors of hope among members of mental health self-help agencies

    Social Work in Mental Health

    (2004)
  • S. Houghton

    Exploring hope: its meaning for adults living with depression and for social work practice

    Advances in Mental Health

    (2007)
  • L.M. Irving et al.

    Hope and recovery from substance dependence in homeless veterans

    Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology

    (1998)
  • L.M. Irving et al.

    Hope, coping, and social support in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (1997)
  • J.K. Johannesen et al.

    Perception of illness as a barrier to work in consumers of supported employment services

    Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

    (2007)
  • N.A. Karanci

    Causal attributions for psychological illness among Turkish psychiatric in-patients and their relationships with hope

    International Journal of Social Psychiatry

    (1986)
  • N.J. Kaslow et al.

    Risk and protective factors for suicidal behavior in abused African American women

    Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

    (2002)
  • Cited by (130)

    • Translating mental health recovery guidelines into recovery-oriented innovations: A strategy combining implementation teams and a facilitated planning process

      2022, Evaluation and Program Planning
      Citation Excerpt :

      The transformation of services to a recovery-orientation addresses a crucial quality gap in mental health services, namely their traditional focus on symptom reduction, clinical outcomes, professional dominance and control over the “expertise of lived experience” (Adnoy Eriksen, Arman, Davidson, Sundfor & Karlsson, 2014; Borg & Kristiansen, 2004; Deegan, 1988; Glover, 2005; Gravel, Légaré, & Graham, 2006; Nordt, Rossler, & Lauber, 2006; Shahar, Trower, Iqbal, Birchwood, Davidson & Chadwick, 2004). Recovery-oriented services confront issues of dependency, self-stigma and hopelessness among service users (Brohan, Elgie, Sartorious & Thornicroft, 2010; Corrigan, Watson, & Barr, 2006; Schrank, Bird, Rudnick & Slade, 2012; Shahar et al., 2004), by shifting the focus to self-management and control (Schrank et al., 2012; Shahar et al., 2004), as in services for chronic medical conditions (Glasgow, McKay, Piette & Reynolds, 2001; Lawn, Battersby, Pols, Lawrence, Parry & Urukalo, 2007; Siantz & Aranda, 2014); and by supporting collaborative relationships between service users and providers (Davidson & Chan, 2014; Deegan, 2014; Joosten, DeFuentes-Merillas, de Weert, Sensky, van der Staak & de Jong, 2008; Klockmo, Marnetoft, Selander & Nordenmark, 2014; Sweeney et al., 2014), peer support (Borg & Kristiansen, 2004; Green, Janoff, Yarborough, & Paulson; Green, Janoff, Yarborough & Paulson, 2013), stigma reduction (Brohan et al., 2010; Corrigan et al., 2006; Watson, Corrigan, Larson & Sells, 2007) and community integration (Amering, Hofer, & Rath, 2002; Davidson, Borg, Marin, Topor, Mezzina & Sells, 2005; Davidson, Tondora, O'Connell, Kirk, Rockholz & Evans, 2007; Deegan, 2005; Farkas, 2007; Onken, Dumont, Ridgway, Dornan & Ralph, 2002; M. Slade et al., 2014; Spaniol, 2009). By promoting a life in society, not just in services, recovery honors the full personhood of people with mental illness in ways that traditional services do not (Atterbury, 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text