Alterations of Sexual Function in Men With Cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2008.02.010Get rights and content

Objectives

To provide an overview of the challenges in sexuality men face when they have been diagnosed and treated for various types of cancer.

Data Sources

Review and research articles, abstracts, books, electronic databases, clinical experience.

Conclusions

An in-depth assessment of sexual needs and issues specific to men includes physical and psychosocial problems related to sexuality. Interventions include psychosocial sexual interventions, coping strategies, communication strengthening exercises, or alternative sexual techniques that will assist if physical functioning is diminished. Various medical, surgical, or pharmacologic approaches are available.

Implications for Nursing Practice

Although it is recognized that male sexuality in the cancer arena has been overlooked in the past, nurses have the opportunity to change this trend in the clinical setting and improve sexual health care delivery for men.

Section snippets

Context of Sexuality for Men With Cancer

It is clear that cancer affects both members of the couple, not just the patient. This impact on partners and the dyadic relationship is reflected in a growing body of literature.5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 It has been shown that men and women tend to respond differently to the stress of a cancer diagnosis.9, 15, 16, 17 However, even successful treatment can alter the quality of the couple's relationship.18

Some researchers have noted partners of patients with cancer experience more

Psychological and Physiological Impact of Cancer Treatment on Men's Sexuality

The various kinds of treatment and approaches to manage a cancer diagnoses impact men and their sexual health-related quality of life (QOL). It is important to acknowledge that men often receive more than one treatment for their cancer diagnosis and, consequently, may face multiple challenges and treatment-related sequelae The examples discussed below reflect the primary concerns regarding sexuality men and their partners may face with a particular treatment approach and how it will impact this

Sexual Assessment

Sexuality and intimacy questions are frequently omitted by the provider taking the health history of the male cancer patient for various reasons.79, 80, 81 These reasons include clinic appointment time schedule, the provider's lack of recognition of the importance of sexual function related to the man's HRQOL, and the provider's comfort level in discussing sexual and intimacy issues. Some do not bring up the issue of sexuality because the average patient appointment time frequently is too short

Psycho-Social Sexual Interventions

Interventions for sexual dysfunction evolve out of the sexual assessment. During the assessment the oncology nurse can determine the couples' lifestyle preferences, the nature of their before-cancer sexual relationship, frequency of sexual activity, and relational satisfaction of both partners. The sexual intervention model adapted here is a psychosocial education model to assist couples with education in coping, communication, alternate or adapted techniques for sexual expression, management

Conclusion

Cancer impacts men's HRQOL in a number of ways. However, the focus of the preceding discussion has been on how cancer specifically affects sexuality for men who have been diagnosed and treated with various types of cancers. Some of the sequelae are more obvious, while other treatment-related side effects are less intuitive. It is important to note that the impact of cancer on men's sexual functioning and satisfaction does not happen in a vacuum. Rather, the context for this experience for men

Michael E Galbraith, RN, PhD: Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.

References (94)

  • J.R. Dahn et al.

    Sexual functioning and quality of life after prostate cancer treatment: considering sexual desire

    Urology

    (2004)
  • G.H. Mumma et al.

    Long-term psychosexual adjustment of acute leukemia survivors: impact of marrow transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy

    Gen Hosp Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • D. Bohlen et al.

    Fertility and sexual function following orchiectomy and 2 cycles of chemotherapy for stage 1 high risk nonseminomatous germ cell cancer

    J Urol

    (2001)
  • C. Higano

    Side effects of androgen deprivation therapy: monitoring and minimizing toxicity

    Urology

    (2003)
  • F.R. Romero et al.

    Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer

    Urology

    (2005)
  • Institute of Medicine and National Research Council of the National Academies. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition

    (2006)
  • Cancer Facts and Figures

    (2008)
  • Public Health and Aging: Trends in aging–United States and worldwide

    Morbid Mortal Weekly Rep

    (2003)
  • S.A. Cumbie et al.

    Advanced practice nursing model for comprehensive care with chronic illness: model for promoting process engagement

    Adv Nurs Sci

    (2004)
  • J. Harden

    Developmental life stage and couples' experience with prostate cancer: a review of the literature

    Cancer Nurs

    (2005)
  • G.T. Deimling et al.

    The health of older-adult long-term cancer survivors

    Cancer Nurs

    (2005)
  • S. Lindau

    A study of sexuality and health among older adults

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • D. Feldman-Stewart et al.

    What questions do families of patients with early stage prostate cancer need answered?

    J Fam Nurs

    (2001)
  • J. Giese-Davis et al.

    Quality of couples' relationship and adjustment to metastatic breast cancer

    J Family Psychol

    (2000)
  • S. Manne et al.

    Psychoeducational group intervention for wives of men with prostate cancer

    Psychooncology

    (2003)
  • K. Skerrett

    Couple dialogues with illness: expanding the we

    Fam Systems Health

    (2003)
  • V.M. Wai-Ming

    Psychological predictors of marital adjustment in breast cancer patients

    Psychol Health Med

    (2002)
  • L. Carlson et al.

    Partner understanding of breast and prostate cancer experience

    Psychooncology

    (2001)
  • L.S. Porter et al.

    Disclosure between patients with gastrointestinal cancer and their spouses

    Psychooncology

    (2005)
  • C. Shields et al.

    Marital attachment and adjustment in older couples coping with cancer

    Aging Ment Health

    (2000)
  • V. Malcarne et al.

    Problem solving skills and emotional distress in spouses of men with prostate cancer

    J Cancer Educ

    (2002)
  • L. Carlson et al.

    Partners of cancer patients

    J Psychosoc Oncol

    (2000)
  • A. Kiss et al.

    Effect of sex and gender on psychosocial aspects of prostate and breast cancer

    Br Med J

    (2001)
  • M.A. Perez et al.

    Sexuality and intimacy following radical prostatectomy: patient and partner perspectives

    Health Psychol

    (2002)
  • A. Sestini et al.

    Cancer of the prostate: a biopsychosocial review

    J Psychosoc Oncol

    (2002)
  • A.J. Roth

    Improving quality of life: psychiatric aspects of treating prostate cancer

    Psychiatric Times

    (2005)
  • L. Neese et al.

    Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: A phone survey of men's and women's perspectives

    Psychooncology

    (2003)
  • S.L. Manne et al.

    Partner unsupportive responses, avoidant coping, and distress among women with early stage breast cancer: patient and partner perspectives

    Health Psychol

    (2005)
  • R. Banthia et al.

    The effects of dyadic strength and coping styles on psychological distress in couples faced with prostate cancer

    J Behav Med

    (2003)
  • S. Maliski et al.

    Mastery of postprostatectomy incontinence and impotence: his work, her work, our work

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2001)
  • J.L. Scott et al.

    United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gynecological cancer

    J Consult Clin Psych

    (2004)
  • L. Butler et al.

    Behind the scenes: partner's perceptions of quality of life post radical prostatectomy

    Urol Nurs

    (2000)
  • A.L. Canada et al.

    Pilot intervention to enhance sexual rehabilitation for couples after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma

    Cancer

    (2005)
  • F.M. Lewis

    Family-focused oncology nursing research

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2004)
  • S. Sanders et al.

    Couples' surviving prostate cancer: long-term intimacy needs and concerns following treatment

    Clin J Oncol Nurs

    (2006)
  • C.H. Yarbro et al.

    Cancer symptom management

    (2004)
  • S. Hendren et al.

    Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer

    Ann Surg

    (2005)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Self-Reported Sexual Function in Sexually Active Male Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors

      2020, Sexual Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is probably explained by the fact that the BEACOPP schedule includes 2 alkylating agents, namely procarbazine and cyclophosphamide, while the ABVD regimen has only one, namely dacarbazine. Alkylating agents can lead to damage of the gonads, a well-known cause of sexual dysfunction.6–11,13,14,16 Apart from these drugs, gonadal effects also depend on cumulative doses and combinations that have been applied.26

    • Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychological Distress, and Sexual Changes Following Prostate Cancer: A Comparison of Gay and Bisexual Men With Heterosexual Men

      2016, Journal of Sexual Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      This has resulted in gay and bisexual (GB) men, conservatively estimated to make up 3% to 5% of PCa survivors,10 being described as an “invisible diversity,”11 or a “hidden population.”12 There have been appeals for health providers to acknowledge that GB men may experience PCa differently from heterosexual men, necessitating targeted information and support.12,13 However, recent reviews of PCa educational resources report an absence of such targeted support,14,15 leading to calls for research to inform its future development.

    • Addressing changed sexual functioning in cancer patients: A cross-sectional survey among Dutch oncology nurses

      2015, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      For most types of cancer, regardless of the patient's age or relationship status, the disease and its treatment can lead to a deterioration in sexual health (Baker et al., 2005; Beckjord et al., 2011; Den Oudsten et al., 2012; Galbraith and Crighton, 2008; Hughes, 2008; Lange et al., 2009; Sadovsky et al., 2010; Wright et al., 2002).

    • Review: Psychosocial Interventions Addressing Sexual or Relationship Functioning in Men with Prostate Cancer

      2012, Journal of Sexual Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Even if erectile function returns, with or without the assistance of medical aids, many men experience sexual and relationship distress and disruption, and changes in self‐confidence [6,13-15]. Beyond the direct impact of changes to sexual functioning on a couple's relationship, a cancer diagnosis itself can place significant strain on that relationship [16,17]. As such, the importance of including the partner, and addressing general and sexual communication skills in clinical treatment and intervention programs has been highlighted by several authors [9-11,18-20].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Michael E Galbraith, RN, PhD: Associate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO.

    Frances Crighton, RN, PhD: Tony Grampas Urological Oncology Program, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO.

    View full text