Quality of Life Assessments in Clinical Practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2009.11.003Get rights and content

Objectives

To provide information about the value of quality of life (QOL) assessments to improve clinical care.

Data Sources

Published articles, web resources, clinical practice.

Conclusion

Clinical assessment of QOL can lead to improved patient outcomes and provide a means of evaluating the effectiveness of interventions.

Implications for Nursing Practice

QOL assessment provides nurses with a more holistic view of the patient and improves communication between the patient and health care providers.

Section snippets

Value of QOL Research for Evidence-Based Practice

Evidence-based practice is the use of published research findings as a guide to the choice of approaches to patient care. Studies demonstrating the efficacy of nursing interventions provide the most directly applicable guidance for evidence-based practice. For example, Salonen et al1 tested a telephone support intervention with 228 patients with breast cancer 1 week after surgery (approximately half had mastectomy and half had breast-conserving surgery). Two weeks later, those who received the

Value of Assessing QOL in Routine Clinical Practice

A new trend in oncology is the assessment of QOL as a part of routine clinical practice to guide care in an individualized manner. These assessments can be useful for planning care, choosing interventions, aiding in informed decision-making, and promoting care that will generate better outcomes.4, 5 Table 2 lists some of the pros and cons of the clinical assessment of QOL. Several studies have shown the benefits of measuring QOL in the course of routine practice.6, 7, 8 The patients provided

Single-Item QOL Questions

The gold standard for QOL assessment is the use of a published instrument (questionnaire) that has well-established reliability and validity. However, some investment of resources from the clinic is normally required for routine administration and to provide rapid scoring so that the results can be made available immediately. But there is another option for nurses who would like to incorporate QOL assessment immediately into their clinical practice. The assessment of QOL in a clinical setting

Conclusion

According to a recent report from the National Academy of Science, “Cancer care today often provides state-of-the-science biomedical treatment, but fails to address the psychological and social (psychosocial) problems associated with the illness. This failure can compromise the effectiveness of health care and thereby adversely affect the health of cancer patients.”22 The use of individual assessments of QOL and PROs in clinical practice provides a means to address this problem and promote

Claudette G. Varricchio, RN, DSN, FAAN: Varricchio Consulting, Wakefield, RI.

References (22)

  • A.M. Berger et al.

    Variability of patterns of fatigue and quality of life over time based on different breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2009)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Welfare, Quality of Life, and Euthanasia of Aged Horses

      2016, Veterinary Clinics of North America - Equine Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      This approach would be readily transferable to veterinary medicine, and an owner-perceived QoL assessment method has been reported for use in dogs.57 In clinical settings, a rapid evaluation comprising a short series of single-item questions can be used to provide valid QoL assessment, allowing identification of individuals with poor QoL requiring further evaluation.36 Together with a thorough veterinary examination, asking owners to identify QoL domains that they consider to be important for their geriatric horse could be a useful way to inform a tailored, single-item question format, assessment for rating and monitoring QoL in that individual.

    • Quality of Life With Urinary Diversion

      2010, European Urology, Supplements
      Citation Excerpt :

      We must therefore spare a thought for the patient who is asked to make an informed decision about which transposed intestinal segment surgical option to choose. QoL may be measured in clinical practice for several reasons: to assess the impact of a disease or condition on QoL, to assess the impact of a medical or surgical intervention on QoL, to profile a population, to assess the relationship between QoL and prognosis or health outcome, to improve communication, to screen for risk, to identify preferences, to train new staff, and for use in clinical audit and in clinical governance [10–12]. The measurement of QoL is useful for clinical practice beyond research purposes [12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Claudette G. Varricchio, RN, DSN, FAAN: Varricchio Consulting, Wakefield, RI.

    Carol Estwing Ferrans, PhD, RN, FAAN: Professor and Associate Dean for Research, University of Illinois at Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, IL.

    View full text