Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 4, Issue 1, 2 January 2004, Pages 76-87
The Spine Journal

Distribution of anterior cortical shear strain after a thoracic wedge compression fracture

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2003.07.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Background context

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a common clinical problem and may follow trauma or be pathological. Osteoporosis increases susceptibility to fracture by reducing bone mass and weakening bone architecture. Approximately 2.5 million osteoporotic fractures occur worldwide annually, usually involving the vertebrae, wrist and hip. In the United States 700,000 VCFs occur annually, causing significant morbidity, mortality and economic burden. An initial VCF often leads to subsequent VCFs. The strain distribution along the anterior cortex, the major load-bearing pathway in flexion, may be predictive of impending VCF. Regions of high strain distribution are likely to experience secondary fracture.

Purpose

To investigate the distribution of anterior cortical strain at, above and below an experimentally created index VCF to determine the vertebral body at risk of secondary fracture.

Study design

In vitro experimental study using cadaveric thoracic spinal segments.

Methods

Seventeen thoracic spines underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to assess bone mineral density and were divided into T1–T3 (Subsegment 1), T4–T6 (Subsegment 2), T7–T9 (Subsegment 3) and T10–T12 (Subsegment 4). Rectangular rosette strain gauges were applied to the anterior cortices of the vertebrae of each subsegment (vertebrae in each specimen were denoted V1-superior, V2-intermediate and V3-inferior). V1 and V3 were partially embedded into polyester resin blocks, which were used to mount the specimens in a materials testing machine. Nondestructive predefect testing was performed in compression at 125 N and 250 N, followed by flexion at 1.25 Nm and 2.5 Nm. To ensure fracture reproducibility, V2 of each specimen had a trabecular defect created to a volume of 21.3±4.4% of the V2 centrum. Postdefect nondestructive compression and flexion were then performed in a manner similar to the predefect tests, followed by destructive testing in flexion. Anterior cortical shear strain on V1, V2 and V3, applied moments and applied flexion angle were all measured and analyzed.

Results

A VCF occurred in 55 of the 59 subsegments. Fifty-one VCF (93%) were seen in V2 and 4 VCF (7%) were seen in V1. After the creation of the trabecular defect, the shear strain on V2 increased, but a comparison of the postdefect with the predefect nondestructive tests showed no significant differences. The pre- and postdefect shear strain distribution in compression and flexion was V1strain > V3strain > V2strain. Shear strain at failure was highest on V2, and in all subsegments there were significant differences between V2 and V3 (p<.05). In all subsegments there were no significant differences between V2 and V1 (p > .05) at failure with the exception of Subsegment 1 where V2 and V1 were significantly different (p<.05). The predominant strain pattern at failure was V2strain > V1strain > V3strain (V2strain⪢V3strain). Using shear strain as the codeterminant of peak moment with bending stiffness and applied angle at failure, the strain on V1 was the greatest predictor (p = .0084; R2 = 0.78). These findings suggest that the events leading to a secondary fracture probably start before the index VCF occurs and continue with loading beyond the index VCF.

Conclusion

Anterior cortical strain is concentrated at the apex of a thoracic kyphotic curve. The vertebral body immediately above the index VCF has the next highest amount of strain and therefore the highest risk of secondary fracture.

Introduction

Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are a common clinical problem. They may occur after trauma or may be pathological resulting from decreased bone integrity from tumor or metabolic bone disease. Osteoporosis is a “systemic skeletal disease characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture” [1]. Osteoporosis is a silent disease often detected after fractures have already occurred. Approximately 2.5 million osteoporotic fractures occur worldwide annually, usually involving the vertebrae, wrist and hip. Vertebral fractures are the most common osteoporotic fractures and may be associated with significant and progressive physiologic and functional limitations [2]. In the United States about 1.5 million osteoporotic fractures occur annually of which 700,000 are VCFs [3]. The acute pain of the fracture may improve over a few weeks, but more than 30% go on to chronic pain. As height is lost, the patients develop restrictive lung disease and become vulnerable to pneumonia. They also develop a protruberant abdomen causing early satiety on eating and resultant malnutrition. VCFs lead to poor posture, functional impairment, disability and subsequent economic burden [4]. Women with VCF have been found to increase mortality from pulmonary disease [5].

The greatest long-term consequence of VCF is secondary fracture [4], which occurs more frequently after an index VCF [3], [4], [6]. Low bone mineral density (BMD) and previous fracture are strong predictors of new VCF and even better predictors when combined together. A probable reason for this is that the prevalent deformity may increase or alter the load distribution on other vertebrae [7]. The increased risk of fracture in women with an index VCF extends beyond the vertebrae above and below it to distant vertebrae. This may be the result of a combination of altered biomechanics and reduced bone architectural integrity [8].

The load carried by the vertebral body is shared between the trabecular centrum and the peripheral cortex. Osteoporosis reduces the load-carrying ability of the vertebral body through a reduction primarily in trabecular strength [9]. Osteoporotic wedge compression fractures of the spine affect the anterior cortex by increasing the stress concentration to the point of failure. Deformation of cortical bone has been measured with strain gauges, measuring elements bonded to the bone, that through a change in resistance detect a change in length. Determination of bone strain is an important aspect of biomechanics research [10]. Surface strain distribution in lumbar vertebrae was studied by Shah et al. [11] using the techniques of brittlecoat and photoelastic analysis and the principal strain components determined on lumbar vertebrae. These findings were confirmed by a subsequent strain gauge study, and strain was found to be directly proportional to compressive load [12]. Hongo et al. [13] studied the mechanism of burst fracture initiation using strain gauges based on the study findings of Shah et al. [12]. Hongo et al. [13] used the greatest strain distribution as an indicator of the region where the fracture initiates. Other biomechanical studies have used strain gauges to study strain and stress in the spine [14], [15], [16], [17], [18].

The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of anterior cortical strain in thoracic spinal subsegments before and after the evolution of an experimentally created VCF to determine the vertebra at highest risk for secondary fracture.

Section snippets

Specimen preparation

We harvested 17 full spines (occiput to sacrum) from cadavers. Radiographs of the spines were taken to exclude vertebrae with preexisting fractures and deformities. We removed all extraneous soft tissues preserving all ligaments except the anterior longitudinal ligament, which was resected for strain gauge placement (Fig. 1). The spines were then subjected to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to measure bone mineral density (BMD) in grams per square centimeter using a Hologic QDR 4500A

Results

Sixty spinal subsegments from 17 spines were tested. Data were lost from one subsegment because of inadvertent failure in tension during intact testing. The 59 spinal subsegments were made up of Subsegment 1: T1 to T3 (n = 14) and T2 to T4 (n = 1); Subsegment 2: T3 to T5 (n = 1), T4 to T6 (n = 12) and T5 to T7 (n = 1); Subsegment 3: T6 to T8 (n = 2) and T7 to T9 (n = 13); Subsegment 4: T9 to T11 (n = 2) and T10 to T12 (n = 13). The characteristics of each of the subsegments are shown in Table 1. There were 4

Discussion

This study created a reproducible VCF by forming a trabecular defect in the centrum of V2 using inflatable bone tamps. This weakened the vertebral body, causing the cortex to carry a greater load, and ensured that this was the propagation site for the VCF (Fig. 2). There are other methods that have been described to weaken vertebral bodies to ensure that fractures are reproducible [32], [37], [38]. The volume of the defect in relation to the vertebral body was made a fairly constant percentage

Summary

Applied flexion in the thoracic spine deforms the anterior cortex of the spine to a greater degree than axial compression, and anterior cortical shear strain is concentrated at the apex of the index VCF. The vertebra above an index VCF has the next greatest strain concentration at its anterior cortex and is therefore at greatest risk of secondary fracture.

Limitations

Only anterior cortical shear strain was studied, and the strain distribution on the whole vertebral body was not mapped. Rosette strain gauges were used, and the scanner system was limited to 20 channels. Each gauge was connected to three channels, so only six gauges could be used, which would not be adequate for detailed strain mapping of three vertebrae. The primary interest was anterior cortical wedge compression fractures, so this was not considered a great limitation.

The trabecular defect

Conclusions

In thoracic vertebrae with a central defect, we measured anterior cortical strain. Our results show that the shear strain distribution is level independent and concentrates at the apex of a thoracic index VCF. The vertebra superior to the VCF has increased anterior cortical shear strain and therefore is at greatest risk of secondary fracture.

References (47)

  • J Haczynski et al.

    Vertebral fractures: a hidden problem of osteoporosis

    Med Sci Monit

    (2001)
  • D Kado et al.

    Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study

    Arch Int Med

    (1999)
  • R Lindsay et al.

    Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • P Ross et al.

    Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women

    Ann Intern Med

    (1991)
  • E Myers et al.

    Biomechanics of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture

    Spine

    (1997)
  • J Shah et al.

    Surface strain distribution in isolated single lumbar vertebrae

    Ann Rheum Dis

    (1976)
  • J.S Shah et al.

    The distribution of surface strain in the cadaveric lumbar spine

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1978)
  • M Hongo et al.

    Surface strain distribution on thoracic and lumbar vertebrae under axial compression

    Spine

    (1999)
  • Y Suezawa et al.

    The mechanical response of the neural arch of the lumbosacral vertebra and its clinical significance

    Int Orthop

    (1980)
  • K Schultz et al.

    Strain on the interarticular stress distribution: measurements regarding the development of spondylolysis

    Arch Orthop Traum Surg

    (1980)
  • F Pintar et al.

    Cervical vertebral strain measurements under axial and eccentric loading

    J Biomech Eng

    (1995)
  • G Buttermann et al.

    In vivo facet joint loading of the canine lumbar spine

    Spine

    (1992)
  • G Buttermann et al.

    An experimental method for measuring force on the spinal facet joint: description and application of the method

    J Biomech Eng

    (1991)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Clinical, Radiographic, and Morphometric Risk Factors for Adjacent and Remote Vertebral Compression Fractures Over a Minimum Follow-up of 4 Years After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: Novel Three-dimensional Voxel-Based Morphometric Analysis

      2019, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Specifically, even if the LIBCV/ADV ratio is large, the mechanical pressure on the adjacent vertebral body may not increase if the injected BCV is small. Several in vitro biomechanical studies have suggested that vertebrae treated with PVP may increase the mechanical pressure on untreated adjacent vertebrae.26,36,38,42,44 In their in vitro experimental study using cadaveric thoracic spinal segments, Kayanja et al.44 found that the upper adjacent vertebra has increased anterior shear strain and is at greatest risk of AVCF.

    • How are adjacent spinal levels affected by vertebral fracture and by vertebroplasty? A biomechanical study on cadaveric spines

      2017, Spine Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The novelty of the present study is that changes observed at the injured level were mostly repeated (to a reduced extent) at adjacent (uninjured) levels. Vertebral fracture has been reported to increase compressive strain in the anterior cortex of adjacent vertebrae [57,58]. Current results support these findings, with adjacent vertebrae showing a threefold increase in creep deformation anteriorly (Fig. 5).

    • Application of digital volume correlation to study the efficacy of prophylactic vertebral augmentation

      2016, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      It must be noted that most of these studies focused on the overall failure strength of the natural and treated vertebral body, without analysing the strain distribution. The strain distribution has been partially assessed in the untreated vertebral body (Kayanja et al., 2004) (the most stressed region could not be identified as only one strain-gauge was applied on each vertebra). Recently, the strain distribution was measured for a variety of loading conditions with a large number (8) of strain gauges (Cristofolini et al., 2013).

    • Two novel high performing composite PMMA-CaP cements for vertebroplasty: An ex vivo animal study

      2015, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    • In vitro evidence of the structural optimization of the human skeletal bones

      2015, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The studies above concur on the idea that the micro- and macro-structure of the vertebral body is optimized to withstand the daily loads: a distributed force strongly aligned with the vertebral body itself. Any other load, different from the ones for which the structure is optimized, is not resisted as effectively (Figs. 5 and 6): for instance, when a bending moment or an eccentric force are applied, the strength of the vertebra is significantly lower than for a purely axial force (Buckley et al., 2007; Bürklein et al., 2001; Fields et al., 2011; Kayanja et al., 2004; Teo et al., 2001). In fact, a modification to such an optimized structure may results in a weakening of the structure itself.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    FDA device/drug status: not applicable.

    Support in whole or in part was received from the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Research Programmes Committee number 6841 (nonprofit foundation).

    View full text