Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 7, Issue 2, March–April 2007, Pages 165-173
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
Primary tumors of the cervical spine: a retrospective review of 35 surgically managed cases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.027Get rights and content

Abstract

Background context

Primary tumors of the cervical spine are rare, and many issues regarding their surgical management remain unanswered yet.

Purpose

To demonstrate results of surgery for primary tumors of the cervical spine and to elucidate which factors influence outcome.

Study design/setting

Retrospective study.

Patient sample

Sixty-six surgeries were performed on 35 patients, ranging in age from 7 to 70 years.

Outcome measures

Preoperative and postoperative degree of pain and neurological status were quantified. Radiological investigations were used to detect recurrence and evaluate the stability and fusion.

Methods

Data were collected on patient characteristics, therapy, and results. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 15 years (mean 59.9 months).

Results

Posterior (26), anterolateral (24), retropharyngeal (9), combined (4), lateral (2), and transmandibular approaches (1) were used. Chordomas (n=8) and 17 different types of tumors were encountered. One patient died 3 weeks postoperatively and 5 died of their disease at follow-up. Twenty patients had no evidence of disease, and 7 patients had recurrent tumors. According to the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini classification, tumor extension into both anterior and posterior columns of a vertebra was correlated with a poor outcome. Incomplete resections resulted in tumor recurrence which warranted subsequent surgeries (up to 9), especially in chordoma cases.

Conclusions

Complete tumor resection is the oncologically best surgical strategy and should be attempted whenever possible. However, this may not be feasible in every case because of the complexity of the cervical spine. In these cases, acceptable mortality-morbidity rates and symptom-free years could be achieved by subtotal resections, even for malignant tumors.

Introduction

Primary tumors of the cervical spine are rare, and include benign variants such as osteoid osteomas, hemangiomas, giant cell tumors, as well as malignant lesions such as chordomas, plasmacytomas, and osteosarcomas [1]. Given that these tumors typically manifest neck pain as the initial symptom, it is not uncommon that neoplasms of the cervical spine are diagnosed late in their disease course. Because of their location in an anatomically complex region, often impinging on vascular and neural structures, they pose a technically challenging surgical problem; en bloc resection, though the most oncologically appropriate surgical treatment for most tumors, is very difficult [1]. The paucity of surgical series primarily focused on primary cervical spine tumors renders it difficult for clinicians to compare treatment efforts and results and make decisions about optimal treatments.

This report presents our experience in a surgical series of patients harboring primary cervical spine tumors. Special emphasis was placed on differences of chordoma cases, a challenging subgroup. Results of the surgical management were reviewed and clinical features were analyzed to elucidate which factors influence patient outcome.

Section snippets

Patient population and clinical characteristics

From 1991 to 2004, 567 patients with spinal tumors underwent surgery at the University of Ege, Izmir, Turkey. Of these, 146 patients had primary neoplasms, 35 of which (24%) were cervical. The complete medical record was retrospectively reviewed and data were collected on age, gender, symptoms, histological characteristics of the primary tumor, treatment, results, and complications. In all cases, the diagnosis of the tumor was made by histopathological analysis of the specimen obtained in

Results

Twenty-three patients underwent a complete tumor resection (which means removal of all visible tumor, either via en bloc resection or piecemeal removal). Of these, a recurrent tumor was detected in one patient harboring a malignant nerve sheath tumor. The remaining 12 patients had an incomplete tumor excision.

In general, surgeries were successful in neurological improvement and pain control. Of the nine patients who presented with neurological impairment, six improved postoperatively (4 cases

Discussion

The most common presenting symptom of a spinal tumor is pain, with no difference in the nature of pain manifested by benign or malignant tumors [4]. Night pain or pain at rest, not relieved by analgesics, should alert a clinician to the possibility of a tumor. In our series, all but one patient complained of axial or radicular pain, or both. While rapidly progressive symptoms and neurological deficits are traditionally considered to be suggestive of a malignant tumor, this is not necessarily

Conclusions

Complete tumor excision and preservation or restoration of vertebral stability should be the goal for treatment of primary tumors of the cervical spine. In the current series, such a strategy yielded good results in terms of pain relief and neurological improvement with a low mortality/morbidity rate. However, because of the anatomic complexity of the cervical region, locally aggressive tumors pose a technically challenging surgical problem, and en bloc total resection is very difficult. In the

References (22)

  • W.A. Abdu et al.

    Primary bone and metastatic tumors of the cervical spine

    Spine

    (1998)
  • S.G. Tang et al.

    Prognostic factors in the management of metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

    J Neuro-oncol

    (1983)
  • S. Boriani et al.

    En bloc resections of bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine: a preliminary report on 29 patients

    Spine

    (1996)
  • J.N. Weinstein et al.

    Primary tumors of the spine

    Spine

    (1987)
  • H.H. Bohlman et al.

    Primary neoplasms of the cervical-spine: diagnosis and treatment of 23 patients

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1986)
  • A.M. Levine et al.

    Benign tumors of the cervical spine

    Spine

    (1992)
  • O. Gille et al.

    Triple total cervical vertebrectomy for a giant cell tumor: case report

    Spine

    (2005)
  • J.G. Piper et al.

    Management strategies for tumors of the axis vertebra

    J Neurosurg

    (1996)
  • S. Boriani et al.

    Spine update: primary bone tumors of the spine: terminology and surgical staging

    Spine

    (1997)
  • K. Tomita et al.

    Total en bloc spondylectomy: a new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors

    Spine

    (1997)
  • S.S. Fountain

    Single-stage combined surgical approach for vertebral resections

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1979)
  • Cited by (0)

    FDA device/drug status: approved for this indication (cervical plate; occipitocervical plate; lateral mass plate).

    This article was presented at the 7th International Congress on Spine, Belek-Antalya, April 2005.

    Nothing of value received from a commercial entity related to this manuscript.

    View full text