Clinical StudyClinical classification criteria for radicular pain caused by lumbar disc herniation: the radicular pain caused by disc herniation (RAPIDH) criteria
Introduction
Low back pain (LBP) is a common symptom leading patients to visit primary care and musculoskeletal specialty providers [1]. Many individuals with LBP also report an associated leg pain that may indicate nerve root involvement. Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is the most frequently identified cause of radicular pain [2]. However, disc herniations may be found on imaging tests of asymptomatic individuals [3]. Guideline recommendations to decrease the use of spinal imaging in patients with acute LBP, including radicular leg pain without signs suggesting serious etiologies, emphasize the role of history and physical examination findings as key to guiding initial management [4], [5], [6]. Therefore, the diagnosis of radicular pain is predominately clinically based.
In musculoskeletal diseases, the need for classification criteria was recognized 30 years ago as an important step to identify and distinguish patients with a specific disease from those without disease to create homogenous groups of patients for clinical or population studies [7]. In the field of LBP, the Quebec Task Force recognized the necessity to differentiate LBP patients with leg pain and neurologic signs from other categories of LBP patients [8]. Although clinicians are trained to identify patients with radicular pain caused by LDH, no consensus has emerged to produce classification criteria for these patients [9]. As a consequence, researchers use a wide range of eligibility criteria leading to a considerable heterogeneity among patients enrolled in these studies [10]. Classification criteria are useful in clinical research to ensure that study participants have the disease in question and that different centers are studying patients with the same clinical condition [11]. When classification criteria are accepted internationally, they can encourage the use of uniform disease definitions and ensure that studies from divergent locations evaluate the same disease entity [12]. For several musculoskeletal diseases (eg, rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy), widespread adoption of classification criteria has been a key factor leading to improved patient selection and treatment [13]. The absence of such classification criteria for several low back-related conditions has been identified as a limitation in terms of understanding the physiopathology and evaluating new treatments [9], [10].
In view of the large economic burden related to LBP syndromes [14], there is an urgent need to develop classification criteria for LBP-related syndromes [10]. During a workshop at the 11th Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain in Boston, MA, a multidisciplinary, international group proposed the development of classification criteria for LBP-related neurologic leg symptoms.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The present study was designed according to rules defined by Fries for constructing classification criteria [15] and focused on radicular pain caused by LDH and neurogenic claudication (NC) caused by lumbar spinal stenosis. Here, we report on the development and validation of clinical classification criteria for radicular pain caused by LDH.
Delphi process
The literature review and items identified by spine specialists resulted in a list of 236 potential items for spine-related leg pain symptoms and physical examination findings, including 145 associated with radicular pain caused by LDH. The large number of items reflected an inclusive list generation phase with multiple items reflecting small variations among similar concepts (eg, Lasègue sign or SLR test items including five different angles and with three different wordings). In the first
Discussion
A multidisciplinary, international team developed and validated clinical classification criteria for radicular pain caused by LDH. The proposed criteria contained a majority of items relating to the clinician's examination rather than patient-reported symptoms, and differentiated patients with radicular pain caused by LDH from those with LSS or non-NSLBP with referred leg pain. We propose an easy-to-use weighted score of retained items, the RAPIDH criteria, to identify individuals with
Conclusions
The present study proposes clinical classification criteria using a set of five items with good specificity and sensitivity for identifying patients with radicular pain caused by LDH. Although this set of items requires validation in different patients and settings, we believe that such criteria represent an important step in the field of spinal pain research and will contribute to improving the quality of future studies and the evaluation of future treatments.
Acknowledgments
We express our gratitude to all spine experts who participated in the Delphi process and to those who participated in the recruitment of patients. From Belgium: Geneviève Mahieu, consultant, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR), CHU Dinant; Agnieszka Gierasimowicz-Fontana, consultant, PMR, CHU Brugmann, Bruxelles. From France: Violaine Folz and Sylvie Rozenberg, rheumatologist and staff physician, respectively, CHU Pitié Salpétrière, Paris; Virginie Martaille and Emilie Ducourau,
References (36)
- et al.
Non-specific low back pain
Lancet
(2012) - et al.
Sciatica
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2010) - et al.
Appropriate use of lumbar imaging for evaluation of low back pain
Radiol Clin North Am
(2012) - et al.
Epidemiology of spondyloarthritis
Rheum Dis Clin North Am
(2012) - et al.
The use and abuse of diagnostic/classification criteria
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol
(2014) - et al.
Methodological and statistical approaches to criteria development in rheumatic diseases
Baillieres Clin Rheumatol
(1995) On the definitions and physiology of back pain, referred pain, and radicular pain
Pain
(2009)- et al.
Calculating sample sizes for cluster randomized trials: we can keep it simple and efficient!
J Clin Epidemiol
(2012) - et al.
Low back pain
Med Clin North Am
(1995) - et al.
Neurological examination of the peripheral nervous system to diagnose lumbar spinal disc herniation with suspected radiculopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Spine J
(2013)
Diagnostic accuracy of history taking to assess lumbosacral nerve root compression
Spine J
Accelerator-based BNCT
Appl Radiat Isot
Systematic literature review of imaging features of spinal degeneration in asymptomatic populations
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
Study protocol: the back pain outcomes using longitudinal data (BOLD) registry
BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Application of “less is more” to low back pain
Arch Intern Med
Quebec task force on spinal disorders. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders: a monograph for clinicians
Spine
How is radiating leg pain defined in randomized controlled trials of conservative treatments in primary care? A systematic review
Eur J Pain
Variation in eligibility criteria from studies of radiculopathy due to a herniated disc and of neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis: a structured literature review
Spine
Cited by (0)
FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.
Author disclosures: SG: Nothing to disclose. DSC: Nothing to disclose. KK: Nothing to disclose. FMK: Nothing to disclose. MM: Nothing to disclose. JR: Nothing to disclose. MN: Nothing to disclose. JFK: Nothing to disclose. TDC: Nothing to disclose. JNK: Nothing to disclose. SJA: Nothing to disclose.
The disclosure key can be found on the Table of Contents and at www.TheSpineJournalOnline.com.
This study received financial support from an unconditional scientific grant from MSD Switzerland. MSD Switzerland had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. Publication of this study was not contingent upon approval from the study sponsor.