Elsevier

Surgery

Volume 135, Issue 5, May 2004, Pages 479-488
Surgery

Surgical outcomes research
Laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2003.12.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Evidence suggests that laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has advantages over open appendectomy (OA) in the treatment of appendicitis. It remains, however, unclear whether LA is indicated in the elderly patient population.

Methods

Patients with primary International Classification of Diseases, revision 9, procedure codes for LA (n = 32,406 patients) and OA (n = 112,884 patients) were selected from the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Samples. The end points that were under investigation were the length of hospital stay, the rate of routine discharge, and in-hospital morbidity and mortality rates. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk-adjusted association between the surgery type and the patient outcomes. Stratified analyses were performed according to age (65 years and older; less than 65 years old) and to the presence of appendiceal perforation or abscess.

Results

After risk adjustment, patients who underwent LA had a significantly shorter mean length of stay (LA, 2.45 days; OA, 3.71 days; P <. 0001), higher rate of routine discharge (odds ratio, 2.80; P < .0001), lower overall complication rate (odds ratio, 0.92; P = .03), and mortality rate (odds ratio, 0.23; P = .001) compared with OA patients. Similar benefits of LA were found in the strata of patients who were less than 65 years old, in elderly patients, and in patients with appendiceal perforation or abscess.

Conclusion

LA has statistically significant advantages over OA with respect to the length of hospital stay, the rate of routine discharge, and postoperative morbidity and mortality rates for patients who are less than 65 years old, in elderly patients, and in patients with appendiceal abscess or perforation.

Section snippets

Study population and description of databases

Data for patients with International Classification of Diseases, revision 9 (ICD-9), procedure codes for LA (47.01) or OA (47.09) were selected from the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Samples (NIS).11., 12., 13. Patient data with primary diagnosis codes other than appendicitis and with any procedure code of incidental appendectomy were excluded from our analysis (Appendix I). The NIS are among the largest publicly available in-patient databases in the United States. The 1998, 1999,

Results

Our database contained information about 148,660 patients who underwent LA or OA. After the exclusion of patients with a diagnosis of appendicolithiasis and appendicopathia oxyurica (n = 2659) and patients who underwent incidental appendectomies (n = 711), 145,290 patients remained in our analyses: 32,406 patients (22.3%) underwent LA; 112,884 patients (77.7%) underwent OA; 9476 patients (6.5%) were equal to 65 years of age and older; 135,814 patients (93.5%) were less than 65 years of age.

In both

Discussion

This is the first investigation based on data from large nationwide databases that assess important end points in both patients less than 65 years old and elderly patients who have undergone LA and OA for appendicitis. The findings of the present investigation confirm our previous results for the overall patient population, with LA having significant advantages over OA in terms of mean length of hospital stay (LA, 2.45 days; OA, 3.71; P<.0001), rate of routine discharge (OR, 2.80; 95% CI [2.43,

Acknowledgements

We thank the Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, for providing the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Samples.

References (59)

  • I.E Leonard et al.

    Anaesthetic considerations for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

    (2002)
  • Y Ogihara et al.

    Abdominal wall lift versus carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic resection of ovarian tumors

    J Clin Anesth

    (1999)
  • S.I Liu et al.

    Factors associated with conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy

    J Am Coll Surg

    (2002)
  • D Hebebrand et al.

    Laparoscopic or classical appendectomy? A prospective randomized study

    Chirurg

    (1994)
  • D.G Addiss et al.

    The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States

    Am J Epidemiol

    (1990)
  • J.G Peiser et al.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital

    Isr Med Assoc J

    (2002)
  • P.G Blomqvist et al.

    Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987-1996

    Ann Surg

    (2001)
  • K.H Treutner et al.

    Epidemiology of appendicitis

    Chirurg

    (1997)
  • McBurney C. The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of...
  • K Semm

    Endoscopic appendectomy

    Endoscopy

    (1983)
  • U Guller et al.

    Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database

    Ann Surg

    (2003)
  • Katz, M. Setting up a multivariable analysis: subjects. in mulitvariable analysis. A practical guide for clinicians....
  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1998. NIS data and documentation distributed by:...
  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 1999. NIS data and documentation distributed by:...
  • Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2000. NIS data and documentation distributed by:...
  • Ross I, Gentleman R. A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comp Graph Stat;...
  • P Diehr et al.

    Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs

    Annu Rev Public Health

    (1999)
  • V.L Vallina et al.

    Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy

    Ann Surg

    (1993)
  • M Nazzal et al.

    Laparoscopic appendectomy: a viable alternative approach

    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A

    (1997)
  • Cited by (77)

    • Acute Appendicitis: An Open Issue. Current Trends in Diagnostic and Therapeutic Options

      2014, Microbiology for Surgical Infections: Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment
    • "Recurrent" Appendicitis

      2012, AORN Journal
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported in part by the Swiss National Foundation, Bern/Switzerland, Krebsliga beider Basel, Basel/Switzerland, Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft, Basel/Switzerland, and Fondazione Gustav e Ruth Jacob, Aranno/Switzerland (U.G.).

    View full text