Central Surgical AssociationThe malabsorptive very, very long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obesity: Results in 257 patients
Introduction
The standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective and durable weight loss procedure for morbid obesity.1, 2 Super obesity, however, defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of >50 kg/m2, may require a more aggressive operation that involves a selective malabsorption to effect a sufficient amount of weight to ameliorate weight-related comorbidities. Current more aggressive bariatric operations that involve an element of malabsorption include distal gastric bypass,3 biliopancreatic diversion (BPD),4 and duodenal switch with biliopancreatic diversion,5, 6 all of which have their advantages and disadvantages.7 Previously, we reported our preliminary experience in 19 patients with a modification of RYGB termed the “very, very” long limb RYGB (VVLL-RYGB).8 This procedure (Fig) is a modification of the distal gastric bypass3 and consists of the typical proximal anatomy of a vertical, disconnected RYGB.9 However, the VVLL-RYGB has a short 50- to 60-cm biliopancreatic limb, a 100-cm common channel of distal ileum, and a much longer (300 to 500 cm) Roux limb — thus, the term very, very long limb RYGB to differentiate it from the very long limb (150 cm) RYGB of Brolin et al.10 The VVLL-RYGB procedure was designed to minimize the length of bypassed small bowel (biliopancreatic limb), while establishing a short common channel of distal ileum to minimize digestion and absorption. With any form of malabsorptive anatomy, potential long-term nutritional and metabolic sequelae exist. Our aims were to evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality and, more importantly, the long-term efficacy on weight loss, comorbidities, and development of metabolic complications.
Section snippets
Methods
After approval by the Mayo Institutional Review Board, we conducted a retrospective review using our prospective database of all consecutive patients (n = 1435) undergoing bariatric surgery from 1985 to 2004, which allowed at least a 1-year follow-up. This review included all 257 consecutive patients undergoing VVLL-RYGB. In addition to our usual set of questionnaires sent at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48 months postoperatively, we also sent out a more detailed follow-up questionnaire to acquire
Patients
During this 19-year period, the 257 patients who underwent VVLL-RYGB were 45 ± 11 years of age (range, 15 to 74 years) with a BMI of 61 ± 11 kg/m2 (range, 41 to 108). There were 102 men and 155 women; the percentage of males in this group is much greater than in our overall bariatric experience during the same time period (40% vs 25%, respectively). Prevalence of comorbidities at the time of VVLL-RYGB included severe arthritis/arthropathy (79%), hypertension (60%), diabetes mellitus requiring
Discussion
Our experience with the VVLL-RYGB confirms its efficacy and relative safety in this select population of patients at the extreme of morbid obesity. Operative mortality in this high-risk group was low (<1%), and operative morbidity was as expected, with an 11% incidence of wound complications (infection, dehiscence) characteristic of the super obese after an open celiotomy. Most encouraging, however, were the reversal of comorbidities, the relative paucity of severe malnutrition, and the success
References (14)
- et al.
Surgical treatment of obesity and its effect on diabetes: 10-year follow-up
Am J Clin Nutr
(1992) - et al.
Concise review for primary-care physicians--Surgical treatment of obesity: who is an appropriate candidate?
Mayo Clin Proc
(1997) - et al.
Malabsorptive procedures for severe obesity: comparison of pancreaticobiliary bypass and very very long limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
J Gastrointestinal Surg
(1999) - et al.
Enteric hyperoxaluria, nephrolithiasis, and oxalate nephropathy: potentially serious and unappreciated complications of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
(2005) - et al.
Chronic renal failure secondary to oxalate nephropathy: a preventable complication after jejunoileal bypass
Mayo Clin Proc
(2001) - et al.
Conversion of proximal to distal gastric bypass for failed gastric bypass for superobesity
J Gastrointest Surg
(1997) - et al.
Biliopancreatic diversion
World J Surg
(1998)
Cited by (81)
Future of bariatric surgery beyond simple weight loss: Metabolic surgery
2023, Journal of Visceral SurgeryThe role of total alimentary limb length in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review
2022, Surgery for Obesity and Related DiseasesCitation Excerpt :Srikanth et al. reported that with a 300-cm TALL, a >150-cm CC provided a better balance between weight loss and nutritional deficiencies [23]. Three studies reported a 100-cm CC with a 400- to 700-cm TALL resulted in a lower limb lengthening rate (1.1%–3.5%) compared with studies using a 100-cm CC with TALL ≤400 cm (Table 4) [10,24,25]. Within these studies, however, Thurnheer et al. reported a hypoalbuminemia rate of 13.3% with a 100-cm CC and >600-cm TALL, although the limb lengthening rate was low at 1.1% [25].
Proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Addressing the myth of limb length
2019, Surgery (United States)Citation Excerpt :Results have been mixed regarding the magnitude of improvement of cardio-metabolic outcomes as compared with proximal RYGB. Similarly, the so-called very, very long limb RYGB used a short BPL (50 cm), a very long AL, and a CC of only 50 to 100 cm.11 A 2018 systematic review explored the importance of the BPL length in gastric bypass results identifying 13 studies addressing the BPL in proximal and distal RYGB.35
Improvement in pulmonary function in asthmatic patients after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2019, Surgery for Obesity and Related DiseasesLaparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Current Controversies in Limb Length Measurements
2023, Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: A Comprehensive Guide: Second Edition