ReviewLaparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: Our instruments and technique
Introduction
A laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and aortic lymph node dissection was initially characterized by a longer operative time and questionable radicality, but during the past decade several reports showed the safety of this procedure [1], [2] and suggested that performing the procedure laparoscopically did not adversely affect the patient's overall prognosis and survival [3], [4], [5], [6].
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) for the management of early stage cervical cancer appeared associated with a low morbidity without compromising the degree of oncological radicality required. Laparoscopy offered to patients the potential benefits of decreased discomfort with decreased convalescence time [7], [8]. Nevertheless, few long-term data are available on the morbidity of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and survival after this procedure [9], [10].
In this study we evaluated the technique of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III procedure) with lymphadenectomy as performed at the Advanced Gynecological Endoscopy Center of the Malzoni Medical Center, Avellino, Italy.
Section snippets
Material and methods
In our experience 77 consecutive patients (mean age 41 years, range 27–69) underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with lymphadenectomy between January 2000 and March 2008 at the Advanced Gynecological Endoscopy Center of the Malzoni Medical Center, Avellino, Italy.
FIGO stage included five patients Ia1 with LVSI (lymph-vascular involvement), 24 patients Ia2, and 48 patients Ib1. All patients involved in the study had their initial pathologic diagnosis confirmed at our
Results
All patients underwent total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy during the study period and none of the surgeries required conversion to laparotomy.
Histological types included squamous cell carcinoma in 65 patients, adenocarcinomas in 10 patients, and adenosquamous carcinoma in two.
Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed up to the level of the inferior mesenteric artery in eight cases with positive pelvic lymph nodes at frozen section evaluation.
In our experience,
Discussion
During the past decade, some reports have shown the feasibility of radical hysterectomy performed entirely by laparoscopy [2], [3], but much less is known about the morbidity and mortality rates that are associated with laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymph node dissection and survival after this procedure [6], [7].
In a recent report, Frumovitz et al compared intra-operative, pathologic, and postoperative outcomes of 35 women who underwent total laparoscopic
Conclusion
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy can be considered a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for the management of early stage cervical cancer with a low morbidity and is characterized by minimal blood loss and postoperative hospitalization; moreover, the laparoscopic route may offer an alternative option for patients undergoing radical hysterectomy, although multicenter studies and long-term follow-up are required to evaluate the overall oncologic outcomes of this procedure.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors of this research paper have directly participated in the planning, execution, or analysis of this study and have read and approved the final version submitted. All authors disclose any financial and personal relationships with other people or organisations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflicts of interest include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and
References (34)
- et al.
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a preliminary report
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
(1994) - et al.
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol
(1995) - et al.
Feasibility, morbidity and safety of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: our experience
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2007) - et al.
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience
Gynecol Oncol
(2006) - et al.
Laparoscopic paraaortic left-sided transperitoneal infrarenal lymphadenectomy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: technique and results
Gynecol Oncol
(2003) - et al.
A plea for preservation of the pelvic autonomic nerves
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III
Gynecol Oncol
(2000) - et al.
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy
Gynecol Oncol
(2003) - et al.
Laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy by the Pune technique: our experience of 248 cases
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2007) - et al.
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears
J Minim Invasive Gynecol
(2006)
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study
Gynecol Oncol
Survival for stage IB cervical cancer with positive lymph node involvement: a comparison of completed vs abandoned radical hysterectomy
Gynecol Oncol
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using Lee-Huang portal and McCartney transvaginal tube
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
Manometric characterization of rectal dysfunction following radical hysterectomy
Gynecol Oncol
The LANN technique to reduce postoperative functional morbidity in laparoscopic radical pelvic surgery
J Am Coll Surg
An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications and with no loss of therapeutic results for invasive cervical cancer
Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol
Laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology
Surg Clin North Am
Cited by (26)
Invasive cervical cancer
2023, DiSaia and Creasman Clinical Gynecologic OncologyInvasive cervical cancer
2018, Clinical Gynecologic OncologyLaparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Can Be Routinely Used for Treatment of Early-stage Cervical Cancer: A Single-institute Experience With 404 Patients
2015, Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyCitation Excerpt :However, in oncology, when introducing a new surgical technique, in addition to the feasibility and morbidity advantages of the technique, whether the patient outcome (indicated by the survival and relapse rates) is better or at least comparable with the standard approach should be considered [12]. As reported in a series of retrospective case-control studies, for early stage tumors (≤IB1), the 5-year disease-free survival rate did not differ between women with cervical cancer receiving LRH and those receiving radical abdominal hysterectomy [5,7,19]. Yan et al [14] reported 240 cases with a 17.19% recurrence rate and an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 100% for patients with a Ia2 tumor, 79% for patients with a IB tumor, and 60% for patients with a IIA tumor.
Minilaparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Multi-institutional experience in comparison with conventional laparoscopy
2013, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :The procedures were performed by surgeons with extensive training and experience in gynecologic oncology and in advanced minimally invasive surgery and we ascertained no substantial differences in the technique between centers or surgeons. Detailed description of the laparoscopic approach used for radical procedures has been reported elsewhere.17,18,20 The trocar configuration was identical for all procedures and consisted of the camera trocar at the umbilicus and three ancillary trocars, one in the midline suprapubically and two lateral to the epigastric arteries, in the left and right lower abdominal quadrants.
Management and Outcome of Rectal Injury During Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery
2013, Journal of Minimally Invasive GynecologyInvasive Cervical Cancer
2012, Clinical Gynecologic Oncology: Eighth Edition