Elsevier

Survey of Ophthalmology

Volume 54, Issue 6, November–December 2009, Pages 663-670
Survey of Ophthalmology

Major Review
Plus Disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.02.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Our understanding of plus disease as an important sign for severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) has gradually been refined over the past 30 years. As a result of the Early Treatment for ROP (ETROP) randomized trial, the presence of plus disease is now the primary indication for laser treatment. Since the Cryotherapy for ROP trial first introduced a standard photograph as the minimum abnormality necessary for diagnosing plus disease, an intermediate level of vascular dilatation and tortuosity (pre-plus disease) has been defined. However, the recognition of plus disease remains problematic, primarily because of its subjective nature. As our understanding of the pathologic basis for plus disease in ROP grows, objective methods of recognizing and measuring retinal vascular abnormalities are also being designed. Semiautomated methods are being developed to quantify the vascular morphologic changes seen in plus disease and show promise for augmenting clinical judgment in the recognition and timely treatment of ROP.

Introduction

The revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) resulting from the Early Treatment of ROP (ETROP) randomized trial have resulted in a significant change in clinical practice.9 The presence of plus disease has now become the primary indication for laser treatment. Although zones and stages of ROP are noted, they have become of secondary importance in determining whether laser treatment is needed. The ETROP study found that the presence of plus disease should play a pivotal role in the treatment decision process.10, 12 The new clinical algorithm calls for treatment of type 1 ROP, including eyes with plus disease having any ROP in zone I, or stage 2 or 3 ROP in zone II. Type 1 also includes eyes without plus disease with stage 3 ROP in zone I, but this scenario is relatively uncommon. Continued observation is recommended for the remaining prethreshold eyes, designated as type 2 ROP (eyes without plus disease having stage 1 or 2 ROP in zone I or stage 2 or 3 ROP in zone II). The purpose of this article is to review the history and pathophysiology of plus disease and to discuss the application of new technology to improve its diagnosis.

Section snippets

History of Plus Disease

Even before the term plus disease was coined, the prognostic importance of markedly dilated and tortuous vessels in the posterior pole was recognized. Owens and Owens were the first to describe the course of ROP, including its early stages of development.30 The first detectable abnormality was a slight dilation of the retinal arteries and veins. This dilatation gradually increased and was more marked in the veins, which nearly tripled their normal size. As the vessels increased in size, the

Pathologic Basis of Plus Disease

The progressive changes in posterior pole vessels that lead to plus disease usually occur in a predictable fashion. These vascular changes may occur gradually from biologic causes or more quickly as a result of flow mechanics. Vessels may be gradually remodeled over time in response to factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Flow mechanics can change the appearance of vessels abruptly, as is seen when vessels appear thinner while an eye is undergoing scleral depression. Of

Plus Disease Predicting Visual and Structural Outcomes

Palmer et al found that the median onset of plus disease in the CRYO-ROP trial was 36.3 weeks postconceptional age, with 95% of infants of all birth weights who developed plus disease doing so by 42.9 weeks postconception.31 Plus disease typically occurs in eyes with advanced ROP and often portends a poor visual outcome.8, 39, 41

Even before the ETROP study, the presence of plus disease was known to be one of the most important prognostic indicators in ROP, and it was more predictive of poor

Recognition of Plus Disease

As early observers suggested and later studies confirmed, plus disease is a reliable sign of the possibility of serious ROP elsewhere in the eye.7, 13, 35 However, in addition to the inherent challenge of performing indirect ophthalmoscopy on a moving infant that may have poorly dilated pupils, recognition of plus disease has, because of its subjective nature, proven to be an imperfect and sometimes difficult task, and it remains one of the least robust aspects of ROP diagnosis.33 Certainly,

Quantification of Plus Disease

Several investigators have sought to objectively quantify these vascular morphologic changes both clinically and using semiautomated methods.4, 20, 40, 46 In order for blood vessels to be measured, they must first be extracted from an image using a process known as segmentation. Methods of segmentation include vessel tracking, neural networking, and morphologic processing.32 After segmentation, relevant vessels must be identified (either by the computer or its operator) and tortuosity and/or

Conclusion

Findings of the ETROP study clearly point to plus disease as the primary factor for determining when ROP should be treated with laser. Even with treatment, a significant number of eyes with plus disease go on to have poor visual and structural outcomes. There is a growing understanding that there exists a spectrum of retinal vessel dilation and tortuosity, and plus disease is on the severe end of this spectrum. This observation raises the possibility that eyes requiring treatment are really not

Method of Literature Search

The authors performed a Medline search using an Ovid database (1950 to October 2008) using plus disease as the search term. The literature search was not limited to the English language, although no translation was required. Inclusion or exclusion of articles was based on relevance to the subject. The reference lists of these articles were reviewed and additional articles were reviewed and included when considered appropriate. A meeting abstract and articles in press were included in an attempt

References (50)

  • D.B. Schaffer et al.

    A classification of retrolental fibroplasias to evaluate vitamin E therapy

    Ophthalmology

    (1979)
  • D.B. Schaffer et al.

    Prognostic factors in the natural course of retinopathy of prematurity. The Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group

    Ophthalmology

    (1993)
  • D.K. Wallace et al.

    Computer-automated quantification of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity

    J AAPOS

    (2003)
  • D.K. Wallace et al.

    Prognostic significance of vascular dilation and tortuosity insufficient for plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity

    J AAPOS

    (2000)
  • D.K. Wallace et al.

    Agreement among pediatric ophthalmologists in diagnosing plus and pre-plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity

    J AAPOS

    (2008)
  • D.K. Wallace et al.

    A pilot study using “ROPTool” to quantify plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity

    J AAPOS

    (2007)
  • S. Ahmad et al.

    Computer-assisted assessment of plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity using video indirect ophthalmoscopy images

    Retina

    (2008)
  • S.R. Aylward et al.

    Initialization, noise, singularities, and scale in height ridge traversal for tubular object centerline extraction

    IEEE Trans Med Imaging

    (2002)
  • J.D. Baum

    Retinal artery tortuosity in ex-premature infants: 18-year follow-up on eyes of premature infants

    Arch Dis Child

    (1971)
  • J.J. Capowski et al.

    A numerical index based on spatial frequency for the tortuosity of retinal vessels and its application to plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity

    Retina

    (1995)
  • M.F. Chiang et al.

    Interexpert agreement of plus disease diagnosis in retinopathy of prematurity

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2007)
  • D.K. Coats

    Retinopathy of prematurity: involution, factors predisposing to retinal detachment, and expected utility of preemptive surgical reintervention

    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc

    (2005)
  • The natural ocular outcome of premature birth and retinopathy. Status at 1 year

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1994)
  • Multicenter trial of cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity: preliminary results

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (1988)
  • Revised indications for the treatment of retinopathy of prematurity: results of the early treatment for retinopathy of prematurity randomized trial

    Arch Ophthalmol

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    The authors reported no proprietary or commercial interest in any product mentioned or concept discussed in this article. Supported by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc., New York, New York, USA.

    View full text