Brief Communication
Association between thrombosis and bloodstream infection in neonates with peripherally inserted catheters

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2007.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Introduction

Peripherally inserted catheters are essential for infants in the neonatal intensive care nursery for administration of medications, parenteral nutrition and blood transfusions. We hypothesized that there is an association between catheter associated thrombosis and catheter associated blood stream infection. The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between catheter associated blood stream infection (CABSI) and catheter-related thrombosis in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Materials and methods

We performed a cohort study of the 1540 peripherally inserted catheters placed in 882 infants from August 2002 until November 2005 in the Duke University Medical Center Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Results

212 peripherally inserted catheters were removed because of thrombosis. We identified 142 cases of CABSI. There was a positive association between thrombosis and infection in infants who did not have lines removed for infection, p < 0.05.

Conclusions

Further study is warranted to determine the pathophysiology between the association between thrombosis and infection and to determine if interventions may decrease the risk of these potentially life-threatening complications.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of the 1540 PICs placed in 882 infants from August 2002 until November 2005 in the DUMC NICU. A CABSI was defined as a positive blood culture which was documented > 24 h after PIC placement or within 72 h of catheter removal. Positive cultures were ignored if the same organism was cultured in the week prior to catheter insertion. Evidence of thrombus included cord, phlebitis, extremity edema, extremity perfusion, and inability to draw or flush the

Results

We analyzed 1540 PIC insertions in 882 infants. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The majority of PICs were placed in the arm (N = 572), foot (N = 488) and hand (N = 326). Other locations included leg, scalp, axilla, neck and groin veins. The most common reasons for catheter insertion included general intravenous access, nutrition, and antibiotics. Reasons for PIC removal were available for 1428 PICs (Table 2). Two hundred eighteen PICs were still in place at the time infants were

Discussion

In this retrospective study we found a thrombosis rate of 13.2/1000 catheter days, and evidence that there is a positive association between catheter thrombosis and infection. Of interest, the occurrence of both infection and thrombosis decreased over time. The parallel decrease also supports the hypothesis of an association between CABSI and thrombosis. The risk of thrombosis was not associated with catheter site. We would expect a higher rate of both infection and thrombosis in younger

Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank the nurses in the DUMC NICU who provide care for the infants and to Katie Cheng and Rose Guo who participated in data entry as students at the North Carolina School of Math and Science.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text