Regular ArticleCoagulation imbalance may not contribute to the development of portal vein thrombosis in patients with cirrhosis
Introduction
Coagulation is a highly integrated cellular and humoral process that is balanced by two opposing drivers [1]. The pro-coagulant driver is triggered by the complex of factor VII and its specific receptor tissue factor, which in turn activates a series of events in the coagulation cascade, ultimately leading to thrombin generation and fibrin clot formation [2]. The primary anti-coagulant drivers include proteins C (PC), its cofactor protein S (PS) and antithrombin (AT). The ratios of pro- to anti-coagulant factors can be considered indexes of the coagulation imbalance [3].
Patients with liver cirrhosis are characterized by decreased levels of most pro- and anti-coagulant factors, with the exception of factor VIII, which is markedly elevated [4], [5], [6]. For decades, it has been believed that patients with cirrhosis are prone to hypocoagulation and autoanticoagulation, and are thus protected from thrombotic episodes [7]. However, accumulating evidence from both clinical [8], [9], [10], [11] and laboratory studies [3], [12] indicates that patients with cirrhosis have an increased tendency to develop thrombosis. Thus, the prevailing paradigm has been challenged by the concept of rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease [7], [13]. This balance may not be as stable as in healthy individuals, and only slight alterations may tip the balance to either bleeding or thrombosis [7].
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a common complication of liver cirrhosis and is associated with decreased liver function and aggravated portal hypertension [14]. The prevalence of PVT in individuals with liver cirrhosis varies from 10% to 25% [15]. It is generally accepted that decreased portal vein velocity is the primary factor underlying PVT in cirrhosis [16]. The role played by coagulation imbalance in PVT is still unclear. Tripodi et al. hypothesized that hypercoagulability due to high factor VIII combined with low PC is an additional risk factor for PVT, but this has never been demonstrated conclusively [3], [17].
The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between coagulation imbalance and PVT in patients with liver cirrhosis by comprehensively analyzing the plasma levels of pro- and anti-coagulant factors.
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
A total of 30 consecutive adult patients (19 males and 11 females; median age, 52 years) with decompensated cirrhosis and PVT who were evaluated between August 2011 and June 2012 were enrolled in this study. The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Criteria for exclusion were hepatocellular carcinoma or other cancer, Budd–Chiari syndrome, splenectomy, previous shunt procedures (e.g., TIPS insertion or shunt
Results
The demographic characteristics of the thirty matched cirrhotic patients with and without PVT are presented in Table 1. The two groups are comparable. The diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was well-established in 57 patients by the combination of history of liver disease, clinical presentations and images and three by liver biopsy, respectively. All patients with cirrhosis were decompensated.
Discussion
This is the first study to comprehensively compare the levels of pro- and anti-coagulant factors between cirrhotic patients with and without PVT. A major strength of our present study was that the PVT patients were matched according to Child-Pugh score. Thus, the interaction of liver function was excluded. We found that the levels of pro- and anti-coagulant factors were similar between the two groups. No difference was observed for the ratios of pro- vs. anti-coagulant factors between the two
Conflict of Interest Statement
No potential conflicts of interest exist.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81000864). The authors gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of Jing Niu, Ziwei Liu and Feifei Wu in data collection.
References (31)
- et al.
Abnormalities of hemostasis in chronic liver disease: reappraisal of their clinical significance and need for clinical and laboratory research
J Hepatol
(2007) - et al.
An Imbalance of Pro- vs Anti-Coagulation Factors in Plasma From Patients With Cirrhosis
Gastroenterology
(2009) - et al.
Haemostatic abnormalities in patients with liver disease
J Hepatol
(2002) - et al.
Hemostasis and thrombosis in patients with liver disease: The ups and downs
J Hepatol
(2010) - et al.
Rebalanced hemostasis in patients with liver disease: evidence and clinical consequences
Blood
(2010) - et al.
Thrombotic risk factors in patients with liver cirrhosis: correlation with MELD scoring system and portal vein thrombosis development
J Hepatol
(2009) - et al.
Hypercoagulability in Cirrhosis: Causes and Consequences
J Thromb Haemost
(2011) - et al.
A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease
Hepatology
(2001) - et al.
Liver cirrhosis
Lancet
(2008) - et al.
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for portal vein thrombosis with symptomatic portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis
J Hepatol
(2011)
Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies
J Hepatol
Evaluation of D-dimer and factor VIII in cirrhotic patients with asymptomatic portal venous thrombosis
J Lab Clin Med
Evidence of normal thrombin generation in cirrhosis despite abnormal conventional coagulation tests
Hepatology
Coagulation disorders and hemostasis in liver disease: pathophysiology and critical assessment of current management
Hepatology
The Coagulopathy of Chronic Liver Disease
N Engl J Med
Cited by (34)
Is there a rationale for treatment of chronic liver disease with antithrombotic therapy?
2015, Blood ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The rationale of such future studies is that the higher potential to generate thrombin, regardless of the cause, is responsible for the onset of PVT as well as for its higher frequency along increasing stages of disease. One small study investigated changes in the FVIII-to-Protein C ratio in this context and concluded that an increase in the ratio was not associated with the PVT process [86,87]. Another study singly examining FVIII also found no associations with the exception of paradoxically low FVIII levels in severe cirrhotic patients with PVT compared to non-PVT controls [79].
Risk factors for non-neoplastic portal vein thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis
2023, Journal of Clinical HepatologyPortal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: A literature review
2023, Frontiers in MedicineReview article: thromboelastography in liver diseases
2022, Alimentary Pharmacology and TherapeuticsProtein S for portal vein thrombosis in cirrhotic patients waiting for liver transplantation
2020, Journal of Clinical Medicine