Elsevier

Thrombosis Research

Volume 137, January 2016, Pages 3-10
Thrombosis Research

Review Article
The economic burden of incident venous thromboembolism in the United States: A review of estimated attributable healthcare costs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2015.11.033Get rights and content

Highlights

  • An incident case of VTE results in preventable medical costs of about $20,000.

  • VTE is estimated to cost the US healthcare system at least $7–12 billion per year.

  • Additional research is needed to assess preventable costs for specific groups.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is an important cause of preventable mortality and morbidity. In this study, we summarize estimates of per-patient and aggregate medical costs or expenditures attributable to incident VTE in the United States. Per-patient estimates of incremental costs can be calculated as the difference in costs between patients with and without an event after controlling for differences in underlying health status. We identified estimates of the incremental per-patient costs of acute VTEs and VTE-related complications, including recurrent VTE, post-thrombotic syndrome, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, and anticoagulation-related adverse drug events. Based on the studies identified, treatment of an acute VTE on average appears to be associated with incremental direct medical costs of $12,000 to $15,000 (2014 US dollars) among first-year survivors, controlling for risk factors. Subsequent complications are conservatively estimated to increase cumulative costs to $18,000–23,000 per incident case. Annual incident VTE events conservatively cost the US healthcare system $7–10 billion each year for 375,000 to 425,000 newly diagnosed, medically treated incident VTE cases. Future studies should track long-term costs for cohorts of people with incident VTE, control for comorbid conditions that have been shown to be associated with VTE, and estimate incremental medical costs for people with VTE who do not survive. The costs associated with treating VTE can be used to assess the potential economic benefit and cost-savings from prevention efforts, although costs will vary among different patient groups.

Introduction

Estimates of costs of disease can be used to project the benefit of prevention [1], [2]. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), comprising deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is associated with more than one-half million hospitalizations in the United States (US) each year [3], and is a contributing cause in 100,000 or more deaths [4], [5]. It causes long-term morbidity, notably post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) following DVT and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following PE. Medical costs for VTE in the US have been estimated to total $5–10 billion per year [6]. Published estimates of the total economic impact of VTE, including the value of lost economic output due to premature mortality, are as high as $69 billion per year [7], [8]. This paper reviews published estimates of the burden of VTE on the US healthcare system in terms of per-patient and aggregate incremental direct medical costs.

Estimates of the incidence of clinically validated VTE diagnoses fall in the range of 1.0–1.5 per 1000 persons per year, excluding studies of adults over 45 years. Two US studies reported all-age annual incidence of 1.18 per 1000 population in Rochester County, MN, during 1991–1997 [9] and 1.33 per 1000 population in Worcester, MA, during 2009 [10]. Applied to the US population of approximately 320 million people those incidence rates suggest 375,000–425,000 recognized incident VTE cases per year, not including cases that remain undiagnosed and untreated. Two population-based studies from Canada and France reported incident (first) VTE diagnoses in 1.22–1.36 per 1000 people [11], [12]. Two prospective Norwegian cohort studies of adults of all ages reported incidence rates of 1.43–1.48 per 1000 person-years [13], [14], which applied to 245 million US adults implies 350,000–365,000 incident cases per year in adults. Because VTE is a chronic condition, prevalence exceeds incidence; 1 million Americans may have prevalent treated VTE [15].

Section snippets

Methods

Following publication of a critique [6] of published estimates of the economic burden of VTE in the US [7], the author of that critique (SDG) conducted a non-structured literature review in late 2013. To maximize comparability, only studies based on US data published since 2002 were included for the primary search for estimates of first-year treatment costs for patients with an incident VTE. A subsequent structured search of PubMed was conducted in July 2014 to identify US studies that

Acute VTE and first-year costs

MacDougall et al. used claims data to calculate annualized costs of care for patients who had a first acute VTE event compared with similar patients, all of whom had 360 pre-index days free of claims associated with DVT or PE. The authors used regression analysis to control for age, sex, duration of follow-up, and pre-index comorbidities; 85% of VTE patients had a predisposing medical condition (Table 1) [24]. Monthly costs for individuals with less than 12 months of post-VTE claims data were

Discussion

These cost estimates are subject to caveats. First, use of administrative data could bias the average estimated cost of treatment through misclassification of who has an incident condition [16]. Although ICD-9 codes for DVT or PE have fairly high reliability in inpatient records, a fraction of inpatients with those codes do not have acute VTE [63]. Many outpatients classified as having VTE on the basis of an ICD-9 code for DVT and a prescription for an anticoagulant may not have acute DVT

Conclusion

We conclude that the best currently available estimates of the aggregate economic impact of incident or prevalent VTE cases on the US healthcare system are in the range of $7 billion to $10 billion per year, consistent with the majority of previous estimates [6]. Gross per-person treatment costs yield higher estimates, but people with VTE often have higher treatment costs for reasons unrelated to the VTE. It is essential to calculate risk-adjusted costs through use of adjustments for

Acknowledgments

We thank Patrick Lefebvre, Kurt Mahan, Nimia Reyes, and Patrick Romano for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References (84)

  • J.A. Caprini et al.

    Economic burden of long-term complications of deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement surgery in the United States

    Value Health

    (2003)
  • C. Becattini et al.

    Incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension after a first episode of pulmonary embolism

    Chest

    (2006)
  • R. Otero et al.

    Echocardiographic assessment of pulmonary arterial pressure in the follow-up of patients with pulmonary embolism

    Thromb. Res.

    (2011)
  • F. Dentali et al.

    Incidence of chronic pulmonary hypertension in patients with previous pulmonary embolism

    Thromb. Res.

    (2009)
  • A. Barros et al.

    Predictors of pulmonary hypertension after intermediate-to-high risk pulmonary embolism

    Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia (English Edition)

    (2013)
  • A.C. Spyropoulos et al.

    Management of acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: pharmacoeconomic evaluation of outpatient treatment with enoxaparin vs inpatient treatment with unfractionated heparin

    Chest

    (2002)
  • H.M. Kaafarani et al.

    Validity of selected patient safety indicators: opportunities and concerns

    J. Am. Coll. Surg.

    (2011)
  • R.E. Nelson et al.

    Using multiple sources of data for surveillance of postoperative venous thromboembolism among surgical patients treated in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals, 2005–2010

    Thromb. Res.

    (2015)
  • S.Z. Goldhaber et al.

    Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER)

    Lancet

    (1999)
  • S.L. Boulet et al.

    Health care expenditures associated with venous thromboembolism among children

    Thromb. Res.

    (2012)
  • G. Connolly et al.

    Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among ambulatory patients with lung cancer

    Lung Cancer

    (2012)
  • D.P. Rice

    Cost of illness studies: what is good about them?

    Injury Prevention

    (2000)
  • M. Gold et al.

    Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine

    (1996)
  • CDC

    Venous thromboembolism in adult hospitalizations — United States, 2007–2009

  • HHS

    The Surgeon General's Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

    (2008)
  • Thromboembolism: an under appreciated cause of death

    Lancet Haematology

    (2015)
  • S.D. Grosse

    Incidence-based cost estimates require population-based incidence data. A critique of Mahan et al

    Thromb. Haemost.

    (2012)
  • C.E. Mahan et al.

    Deep-vein thrombosis: a United States cost model for a preventable and costly adverse event

    Thromb. Haemost.

    (2011)
  • C.E. Mahan et al.

    Venous thromboembolism: annualised United States models for total, hospital-acquired and preventable costs utilising long-term attack rates

    Thromb. Haemost.

    (2012)
  • W. Huang et al.

    Secular trends in occurrence of acute venous thromboembolism: the Worcester VTE study (1985–2009)

    Am. J. Med.

    (2014)
  • E. Oger

    Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. EPI-GETBP Study Group. Groupe d'Etude de la Thrombose de Bretagne Occidentale

    Thromb. Haemost.

    (2000)
  • V. Tagalakis et al.

    Incidence of and mortality from venous thromboembolism in a real-world population: the Q-VTE Study cohort

    The American Journal of Medicine

    (2013)
  • S. Deitelzweig et al.

    Prevalence of clinical venous thromboembolism in the USA: current trends and future projections

    Am. J. Hematol.

    (2011)
  • G.F. Riley

    Administrative and claims records as sources of health care cost data

    Med. Care

    (2009)
  • W.E. Barlow

    Overview of methods to estimate the medical costs of cancer

    Med. Care

    (2009)
  • J. Lipscomb et al.

    Advancing the science of health care costing

    Med. Care

    (2009)
  • W.E. Encinosa et al.

    The impact of medical errors on ninety-day costs and outcomes: an examination of surgical patients

    Health Serv. Res.

    (2008)
  • J.A. Heit et al.

    Risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based case–control study

    Arch. Intern. Med.

    (2000)
  • G. Kourlaba et al.

    The humanistic and economic burden of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review

    Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis

    (2015)
  • C.K. Boscardin et al.

    Predicting cost of care using self-reported health status data

    BMC Health Serv. Res.

    (2015)
  • Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)

    What Accounts for the Differences in the PCE Price Index and the Consumer Price Index?

    (2010)
  • D.A. MacDougall et al.

    Economic burden of deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and post-thrombotic syndrome

    Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (319)

    • Effect of inferior vena cava filter placement position on device complications

      2023, Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States government. This material is the result, in part, of work supported with resources and the use of facilities of the George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.

    View full text