Elsevier

Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease

Volume 11, Issue 5, September–October 2013, Pages 320-323
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease

Colonisation with multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in hospitalised Danish patients with a history of recent travel: A cross-sectional study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.06.004Get rights and content

Summary

Background

The global spread of multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is a new challenge in health care. Travelling in high endemic areas has been associated with colonisation.

This study was performed among patients hospitalised for any reason, with recent travel abroad to identify the rate for colonisation with multi-resistant bacteria.

Methods

In a 3-month period (2011) all patients admitted to a the Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark with a travel history within the last three months were screened for multi-drug resistant bacteria by a rectal swab.

Results

A total of 88 adult patients were included. None were carriers of carbapenemase-producing bacilli. 12.5% were colonised with extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC). Diarrhoea during travel was significantly associated with colonisation.

More than 80% of the ESBL-EC colonised patients had been abroad longer than two weeks (P < 0.05). Less than 40% of patients with ESBL-EC had self-limiting diarrhoea at the time of admission.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of patients with a recent travel history was colonised with ESBL-EC at hospitalisation (12.5%). Less than half of the travellers with ESBL-EC had gastrointestinal symptoms. Diarrhoea during travel and travelling time > two weeks were associated with colonisation with ESBL-EC.

Section snippets

Background

A fast global spread of multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae has been seen within the last decade. Especially the global spread of carbapenemase-producing gram negative bacteria presents a serious threat to health care systems around the world [1], [2], [3], [4]. The multi-drug resistant bacteria have been reported as a gut colonist suggesting possible transmission by faecal-oral route, hence complicating prevention of the transmission.

Early identification of infected patients and carriers may

Methods

From 6 July to 6 October 2011 all patients admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases and Internal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark were systematically asked to inform about their travel history; this was independent of the reason for hospitalisation. To be included in the study patients should have travelled outside Denmark within the previous three months. Included patients were questioned about travel destination, length of travel, and illness during travel including

Results

During the study period, 425 patients were hospitalised and 88 patients (38 men and 50 women) had a history of travel within the previous three months and were thus included. Median age was 37 years (range 15–74).

Descriptive data on the 88 travellers according to ESBL-EC carrier status are presented in Table 1 and travel destinations are described in Table 2.

None of the travellers carried carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli including the New Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM-1).

Eleven of

Discussion

There is an increasing concern for environmental dissemination of multi-drug resistant bacteria. A number of reports have shown multi-drug resistant bacteria colonising the gut of returning travellers [5], [7], [9].

This study analysed the rate of colonisation by multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in patients with a recent travel history admitted to our hospital.

In this study of hospitalized returned travellers in Denmark we did not find any patients colonised with carbapenem-resistant

Conclusion

In this study we found 12.5% out of 88 hospitalised patients with a history of recent travel to be colonialised with ESBL-EC. None were colonised with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli. Similar to other studies we found that colonisation was associated with diarrhoea during travelling abroad and a duration of travel of more than two weeks.

Funding

No financial support or grant was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

Cited by (32)

  • Bacterial travellers’ diarrhoea: A narrative review of literature published over the past 10 years

    2022, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    Although most travellers who become colonised remain asymptomatic [123], travellers may spread the bacteria within the community and facilitate further dissemination of MDR bacteria on their return [130]. TD has been identified as a significant risk factor for colonisation with MDR bacteria such as ESBL-PE in several studies [125,127,128,132,135–138]. The occurrence of diarrhoea or gastrointestinal disorders during travel may increase the risk of acquiring MDR Enterobactericeae by a factor of 2–3 [135].

  • Screening for antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitalised patients, and risk of progression from colonisation to infection: Systematic review

    2022, Journal of Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    Screening in high risk setting (n = 53 studies, 63.9%)14, 16, 20, 22, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32–36, 38–41, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52–60, 64, 65, 67, 69–72, 75–77, 80, 81, 83, 90, 91, 100–104 was performed largely in ICU or ICU and other wards (n = 40; 75.5%)14, 16, 20, 26, 30, 32–34, 38–41, 43, 45, 47, 50, 52–56, 59, 60, 64, 69–71, 73, 75–77, 80, 81, 100–104; the remaining studies were conducted in haematology (n = 6),22, 35, 65, 83, 90, 91 transplant units (n = 5)25, 28, 36, 58, 67 and rehabilitation wards (n = 2).57, 72 One study27 has not been categorised neither as high-risk nor low-intermediate risk ward. Combining target patient groups and setting type, we identified six screening approaches: all admitted patients (AA) to hospital (8 studies, 9.6%),19, 44, 63, 74, 78, 82, 98, 99 AA patients to high risk ward/s (41, 49.4%),14, 16, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32–34, 36, 38–40, 43, 45, 47, 52, 53, 55, 57–60, 64, 67, 69–73, 75–77, 80, 81, 90, 100–104 AA patients to low/intermediate risk wards (LIRW) (10, 12.0%),13, 17, 21, 23, 24, 46, 51, 62, 86, 105 high-risk (HR) patients admitted to hospital (9, 10.8%),18, 48, 49, 61, 66, 79, 81, 82, 85 HR patients admitted to high risk ward/s (12, 14.4%),22, 30, 33, 35, 41, 50, 54, 56, 65, 83, 91 HR patients admitted to low/intermediate risk wards (LIRW) (2; 2.4%).62, 68

  • Colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in international travelers returning to Germany

    2015, International Journal of Medical Microbiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Thus, the options for empirical antibiotic therapy in cases of clinical infections are limited (Woerther et al., 2013). Several authors from Scandinavia associated gastroenteritis during travel with the risk for ESBL-PE acquisition (Lausch et al., 2013; Östholm-Balkhed et al., 2013; Tängdén et al., 2010). This association was confirmed by the results of our study (p = 0.011).

  • Nosocomial infections and their control strategies

    2015, Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine
  • Do probiotics prevent colonization with multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae during travel? A randomized controlled trial

    2019, Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    In Swedish studies pre-travel colonization rates was 2.4% in 2013 [9] and 7.1% in 2015 [10], and a Finnish study found a colonization rate of 1.2% in 2015 [11]. A Danish hospital-based study found an equal rate of 12.5% colonization among hospitalized patients and showed a tendency to more extensive travel activity among the colonized cases [8]. The post-travel incidence in this study was slightly higher than previous studies from 2014 to 2017 that found ESBL-E colonization rates after travel to India ranging from 62.5 to 90.6% [5,6,10,21–23].

View all citing articles on Scopus

This paper was presented at the 4th Northern European Conference on Travel Medicine, June 6–8, 2012, Dublin as an oral presentation.

View full text