Phylogeography of Francisella tularensis from Tibet, China: Evidence for an asian origin and radiation of holarctica-type Tularemia
Introduction
Tularemia, a disease caused by the bacterium Francisella tularensis (subsp. tularensis, type A; subsp. holarctica, type B), is a public health issue across the northern hemisphere (Rotz et al., 2002). Additionally, concerns regarding the potential use of this bacterium in bioterror or biowarfare have been raised (Dennis et al., 2001, Rotz et al., 2002, CDC, 2005). Type A is the most virulent subspecies and is found almost exclusively in North America, appearing only once in central Europe (Gurycova, 1998). Type B is less virulent in humans, but has spread widely across the northern hemisphere. F. tularensis also includes two low virulence subspecies, novicida and mediaasiatica (Parola and Raoult, 2001, Jackson et al., 2012). These four subspecies are closely related and share most biochemical characteristics but differ in their genetic diversity. F. tularensis subsp. tularensis has two distinct subpopulations (A.I and A.II) (Farlow et al., 2005), as determined by a variety of molecular typing methods (CDC, 2013). F. tularensis subsp. holarctica is divided into five genotypic clades (B.I-B.V) as defined by multi-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). The five clades are further subdivided into ten subclades as determined by real-time-PCR based canonical single nucleotide polymorphism (canSNP) genotyping (Johansson et al., 2004, Vogler et al., 2009). The holarctica subspecies MLVA clades correlate with the subclades determined by canSNP. Genetic diversity in novicida and mediaasiatica subspecies is largely unknown.
Previous genetic studies have provided insight into the origin, evolution and distribution of the four subspecies. Their highly similar genetic content and unidirectional genomic deletion events suggests they evolved from a common ancestor by vertical descent (Svensson et al., 2005). A genome-wide SNP phylogeny revealed close relationships between the four subspecies (Vogler et al., 2009). In this phylogeny, the basal lineage of the four subspecies is novicida, followed by a tularensis lineage associated with mediaasiatica, while the holarctica lineage stands alone. Although confined to North America, but exhibiting different geographical distributions, the two subpopulations of the tularensis subsp. likely evolved from a common ancestor in North America. The holarctica subsp. is thought to have recently emerged through a genetic bottleneck and spread to its current geographic locations, thus explaining the low genetic diversity of F. tularensis (Vogler et al., 2009). The geographic origin of the holarctica subsp. in Asia is suggested by the basal positioning of the holarctica strains that are found only in Japan (Vogler et al., 2009). However, those Japanese strains have diverged from the clades associated with the holarctica radiation. Thus, a North American origin for the holarctica radiation with multiple dispersal events between North America and Eurasia was hypothesized (Vogler et al., 2009). Consequently, the geographic origin and transmission history of holarctica subspecies is controversial.
Here, we report the characterization and differentiation of 18 Tibetan F. tularensis strains by using recently developed high-resolution genetic typing methods. Six of these strains were partially analyzed using the canSNP method (Wang et al., 2014). We found that F. tularensis strains from Tibet are grouped into two separate clades −a clade genetically linking the basal-positioned Japanese isolates and all other subspecies strains in the world and a second clade linked to strains previously found only in North America and Scandinavia.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
F. tularensis strains. Eighteen F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains (T01-18) from natural tularemia foci in the China-Tibet municipality were isolated by predecessors of our institute. Available details of these strains including their alternative ID numbers are shown in Table 1. Three Tibetan strains (T01-T03) were isolated from tularemia patients, while the other 15 were tick or hare isolates. All strains were cultivated on glucose-cysteine blood agar plate with 5% CO2 at 37 °C and were
Results
canSNP genotyping identifies five Tibetan strains previously found only in Japan. The current canSNP assay can divide F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains into 10 subclades by analyzing 13 loci (Vogler et al., 2009). When used to classify the Tibet isolates, T01-T05 strains belong to the B.Br.001/002 subclade, while all the others cluster into the B.Br.OSU18 subclade. Previously, B.Br.001/002 strains were found only in Japan, while the B.Br.OSU18 strains were restricted to North America and
Discussion
Genotyping of worldwide F. tularensis subsp. holarctica strains is important for the understanding of its origination and evolution. Previous hypotheses for the geographical origin of the subsp. holarctica suggested Asia, but not a geographical origin of the current clinically relevant holarctica radiation, was biased due to the lack of a comprehensive set of isolates from Asia, particularly China (Vogler et al., 2009). A study analyzing 10 isolates from China, including six strains used in
Conclusions
Identification of B.VI and B.II strains in Tibet complements existing knowledge of the epidemiology of holarctica subspecies and provides evidence for an Asian origin and radiation of F. tularensis subspecies holarctica. Future exhaustive genotyping or genomic studies in Tibet and other areas of China will likely uncover further genetic diversity in Asia and thereby will assist our understanding of F. tularensis evolution.
Supplementary data
RD and VNTR results for the F. tularensis subsp. holarctica isolates are provided.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. John H. Carlson (Laboratory of Bacteriology, NIAID, NIH, Hamilton, MT, USA) for helpful comments in manuscript preparation. This work was supported by a research grant to Lihua Song from State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity (no. SKLPBS1409). The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References (17)
- et al.
Genome-wide DNA microarray analysis of Francisella tularensis strains demonstrates extensive genetic conservation within the species but identifies regions that are unique to the highly virulent F. tularensis subsp. tularensis
J. Clin. Microbiol.
(2003) Possession, use, and transfer of select agents and toxins, final rule
Fed. Regist.
(2005)Tularemia in United States, 2001–2010
Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep.
(2013)- et al.
Comparative genomic characterization of Francisella tularensis strains belonging to low and high virulence subspecies
PLoS Pathog.
(2009) - et al.
Tularemia as a biological weapon: medical and public health management
JAMA
(2001) - et al.
Francisella tularensis in the United States
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
(2005) First isolation of Francisella tularensis subsp tularensis in Europe
Eur. J. Epidemiol.
(1998)- et al.
Francisella tularensis subspecies holarctica, tasmania, Australia, 2011
Emerg. Infect. Dis.
(2012)
Cited by (6)
Genetic diversity of francisella tularensis subsp. Holarctica in kazakhstan
2021, PLoS Neglected Tropical DiseasesTularemia in the world
2021, Russian Journal of Infection and ImmunityCross-sectional sero-prevalence of tularemia among murine rodents of Nepal
2019, Comparative Clinical PathologyPhylogeographic Distribution of Human and Hare Francisella Tularensis Subsp. Holarctica Strains in the Netherlands and Its Pathology in European Brown Hares (Lepus Europaeus)
2019, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyPhylogenetic Lineages of Francisella tularensis in Animals
2018, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyTularemia from a One Health Perspective
2017, Current Clinical Microbiology Reports
- 1
These authors contributed equally to this work.