Adult urologyImpact of variations in prostatic apex shape on early recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy
Section snippets
Material and methods
A total of 177 patients underwent open RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution from January 2004 to June 2005. Of the 177 patients, we performed a retrospective analysis of the 156 who had undergone preoperative MRI of the prostate and were followed up postoperatively by a review of the records. The patient characteristics are listed in Table I. The mean patient age was 65.9 years (range 48 to 78). The median Gleason score was 6 (range 6 to 9), and the mean preoperative
Results
When patients were subdivided into the four groups and analyzed, group 1 was the largest with 59 patients (37.8%), group 2 had 39 (25%), group 4 had 34 (21.8%), and group 3 had 24 patients (15.3%). The four groups had no significant differences in patient age (P = 0.616), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.530), prostate volume (P = 0.230), operative time (P = 0.649), percentage of those who underwent nerve-sparing (unilateral or bilateral) RRP (P = 0.455), and margin positivity at the prostatic
Comment
As many experienced surgeons know, the prominent apex can be an obstacle in performing RRP, whether open or laparoscopic. It can hamper obtaining an adequate residual length of the membranous urethra after transection and also the process of controlling dorsal vein complex. However, even though such view has been rather widely accepted among surgeons, in reality, objective data supporting such a widespread assumption have been lacking in published reports.
Looking at the published data, Myers2
Conclusions
The results of our study have provided objective evidence that variations in the shape of the prostatic apex in relation to the membranous urethra may significantly affect the recovery of urinary continence after RRP. Such a finding, in turn, gives additional support to the suggestion that a longer residual urethral length after RRP is associated with a more rapid return of urinary continence after surgery. As shown by our investigation, the preoperative evaluation of the apical shape using
References (13)
Practical surgical anatomy for radical prostatectomy
Urol Clin North Am
(2001)Anatomical variation of the superficial preprostatic veins with respect to radical retropubic prostatectomy
J Urol
(1991)- et al.
Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomyrelationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging
J Urol
(2002) - et al.
Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy
J Urol
(1997) - et al.
Urodynamic evaluation of incontinence in patients undergoing modified Campbell radical retropubic prostatectomya prospective study
J Urol
(1984) - et al.
Anatomy of radical prostatectomy as defined by magnetic resonance imaging
J Urol
(1998)