Elsevier

Urology

Volume 69, Issue 6, June 2007, Pages 1095-1101
Urology

Adult urology
Updated Nomogram to Predict Pathologic Stage of Prostate Cancer Given Prostate-Specific Antigen Level, Clinical Stage, and Biopsy Gleason Score (Partin Tables) Based on Cases from 2000 to 2005

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.042Get rights and content

Objectives

To update the 2001 “Partin tables” with a contemporary patient cohort and revised variable categorization, correcting for the effects of stage migration.

Methods

We analyzed 5730 men treated with prostatectomy (without neoadjuvant therapy) between 2000 and 2005 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Average age was 57 years. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the probability of organ-confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, or lymph node involvement. Predictor variables included preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (0 to 2.5, 2.6 to 4.0, 4.1 to 6.0, 6.1 to 10.0, and greater than 10.0 ng/mL), clinical stage (T1c, T2a, and T2b/T2c), and biopsy Gleason score (5 to 6, 3 + 4 = 7, 4 + 3 = 7, or 8 to 10). Bootstrap resampling was used to generate 95% confidence intervals for predicted probabilities.

Results

Seventy-seven percent of patients had T1c, 76% had Gleason score 5 to 6, 80% had a PSA level between 2.5 and 10.0 ng/mL, and 73% had organ-confined disease. Nomograms were developed for the predicted probability of pathologically organ-confined disease, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node involvement. The risk of non-organ-confined disease increased with increases in any individual prognostic factor. The dramatic decrease in clinical stage T2c compared with the patient series used in the previous models resulted in T2b and T2c being combined as a single predictor in the nomogram.

Conclusions

These updated “Partin tables” were generated to reflect trends in presentation and pathologic stage for men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution. Clinicians and patients can use these nomograms to help make important decisions regarding management of prostate cancer.

Section snippets

Patients

The institutional review board at Johns Hopkins approved this study and, when required, written informed consent was obtained from study participants. From 2000 to 2005, we identified 5988 men with clinically localized CaP who underwent RP and staging pelvic lymphadenectomy at the Johns Hopkins Hospital by any of 22 attending surgeons.

Inclusion Criteria

Men enrolled in this cohort had (a) preoperative monoclonal serum PSA level assessed on an ambulatory basis before RP, either before or at least 4 weeks after

Results

A total of 5730 men, average age (± standard deviation) 57.4 ± 6.4 years (range, 34 to 75 years), meeting the eligibility criteria were consecutively enrolled (Table 1). Of these, 89% were white and 7% African American. Prostate-specific antigen levels, GS, and clinical stage groupings are described in Table 1. The final pathologic stage demonstrated that 73%, 22%, 3%, and 1% had OC, EPE, SV+, or LN+, respectively. Comparisons with previous Partin nomograms are shown in Table 2.

Year of RP

Comment

As a result of either changed CaP biology or improved detection, men presenting with CaP today are increasingly likely to have OC.20 This stage migration must be accounted for in models predicting the behavior of CaP for contemporary patients. We have used data from 5730 patients treated between 2000 and 2005 to develop an updated nomogram (Partin tables), using preoperative PSA level, clinical stage, and GS to provide the estimated probability of various final pathologic stages at RP. Because

Conclusions

We have updated the “Partin tables” on the basis of data from men treated after 2000, to reflect current trends in presentation and pathologic stage in men newly diagnosed with CaP. Clinicians can use these nomograms, based on the large cohort of men with CaP treated at our institution, to counsel individual patients and help them make important management decisions.

References (30)

  • M.L. Blute et al.

    Pattern of failure after radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically and pathologically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: influence of tumor deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy

    J Urol

    (1989)
  • J.I. Epstein et al.

    Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • J.I. Epstein et al.

    Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer

    JAMA

    (1994)
  • A.W. Partin et al.

    The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (1993)
  • A.W. Partin et al.

    Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancerA multi-institutional update

    JAMA

    (1997)
  • A.W. Partin et al.

    Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin tables) for the new millennium

    Urology

    (2001)
  • M. Aleman et al.

    Age and PSA predict likelihood of organ-confined disease in men presenting with PSA less than 10 ng/mL: implications for screening

    Urology

    (2003)
  • I. Cagiannos et al.

    A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2003)
  • M.W. Kattan et al.

    Counseling men with prostate cancer: a nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors

    J Urol

    (2003)
  • M.W. Kattan et al.

    Evaluation of a nomogram used to predict the pathologic stage of clinically localized prostate carcinoma

    Cancer

    (1997)
  • M. Ohori et al.

    Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2004)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Prediction of organ-confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms

    Radiology

    (2006)
  • A. Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2005

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2005)
  • M. Han et al.

    An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series

    J Urol

    (2004)
  • M.L. Blute et al.

    Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer

    J Urol

    (2000)
  • Cited by (420)

    • A class of categorization methods for credit scoring models

      2022, European Journal of Operational Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by National Institute of Health/National Cancer Institute (NIH/NCI) SPORE grant P50CA58236, The Prostate Cancer Foundation, and Early Detection Research Network/NIH/NCI grant U01-CA86323.

    View full text