Endourology and StonesDoes Pelvicaliceal System Anatomy Affect Success of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?
Section snippets
Material and Methods
A total of 1012 PCNL procedures were performed in the Department of Urology at our department from January 2006 to February 2010. Of these, 573 procedures with preoperative intravenous urography (IVU) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with radiolucent stones and/or low-quality IVU results were excluded, because these factors can confuse the measurement of other anatomic factors. The remaining 498 procedures were included in our study.
The PCS anatomic factors we analyzed included the PCS
Results
A success rate of 78.1% was achieved (group 1), and 21.9% patients had residual stones (group 2). Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex distribution, and body mass index. No significant difference was found with respect to a history of open surgery between the 2 groups (18.3% in group 1 vs 22.0% in group 2, P = .23). The mean stone size was 7.1 ± 4.8 cm2 for group 1 and 9.2 ± 6.2 cm2 for group 2 (P = .001). Group 1 contained 82 patients (21.1%) with staghorn stones, and group 2
Comment
The PCNL success rate has progressively increased since the technique was first used in 1976 because of the many advances in endoscopic equipment and techniques. The PCNL success rate varies from 72% to 98%, with acceptable complication rates reported for large series.11, 12, 13
The PCS anatomy is one of the most neglected aspects during endourologic stone removal. Because a thorough understanding of PCS anatomy is necessary to perform reliable endourologic procedures, several different PCS
Conclusions
PCNL is an effective treatment modality for all types of PCS. Of the anatomic variables we examined, the PCS surface area appeared to be the only anatomic factor that affected the PCNL success rate, and patients with a <20.5 cm2 PCS surface area had greater PCNL success rates. Therefore, surgeons should be aware that patients with a large PCS (for any reason, including previous surgery or stone obstruction) might have lower PCNL success rates, and these patients should be informed accordingly.
References (17)
- et al.
Current indications for open stone surgery in an endourology center
Urology
(1995) - et al.
Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi
J Urol
(1999) - et al.
Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy
J Urol
(1998) - et al.
Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy
J Urol
(2000) - et al.
Is pelvicaliceal anatomy a risk factor for stone formation in patients with solitary upper caliceal stone?
Urology
(2006) - et al.
Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases
J Urol
(1985) - et al.
Improving outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy access
Eur Urol EAU Update Ser
(2005) - et al.
Tubeless procedure is most important factor in reducing length of hospitalization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: results of univariable and multivariable models
Urology
(2011)