InfertilityEfficacy of Varicocele Repair in Different Age Groups
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
During March 2012 to March 2013, this study was performed in Al-Zahra Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
The Committee of Ethics approved the protocol, and patients signed an informed consent before joining the study.
We prospectively studied a cohort of 100 primary infertility patients aged 20-50 years who had 1-sided (left) varicocele and an abnormality in at least 1 semen parameter (concentration, motility, and morphology) based on World Health Organization reference values.11 Sample size of 42 patients
Results
Mean patient and spouse ages were 30 and 26 years, respectively. Mean sperm concentrations in group 1 (≤30 years) were 40.2, 57.1, and 68.1 million/mL before, 6 months, and 12 months after varicocele repair. Mean sperm concentrations in group 2 (>30 years) were 49.7, 53.7, and 58.4 million/mL before, 6 months, and 12 months after varicocele repair. The increase in sperm concentration was statistically significant in both groups (P <.001). Moreover, the increase in sperm concentration in group 1
Comment
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of varicocelectomy on semen parameters and spouse pregnancy rates in 2 groups of primary infertility patients with varicocele (≤30 years and >30).
In the study by Grasso et al12 in 2000, varicocelectomy had no significant effects on semen parameters and spouse pregnancy in patients >30 years.
In the present study, sperm concentration increased significantly in both age groups after varicocelectomy (P <.001). The study by Evers et al,13 too,
Conclusion
There was no statistically significant difference in semen parameter improvement and spouse pregnancy rates after varicocele repair in the 2 groups (≤30 years and >30 years). Varicocele repair can thus be recommended for older patients if indicated.
References (15)
- et al.
Older age is associated with similar improvements in semen parameters and testosterone after subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy
J Urol
(2011) - et al.
Loss of fertility in men with varicocele
Fertil Steril
(1993) - et al.
Reversal of testicular growth failure by varicocele ligation
J Urol
(1987) - et al.
Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study
Urology
(1977) - et al.
The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone levels in infertile men with varicoceles
J Urol
(1995) - et al.
Nomograms for predicting changes in semen parameters in infertile men after varicocele repair
Fertil Steril
(2014) - et al.
Assessment of efficacy of varicocele repair for male subfertility: a systematic review
Lancet
(2003)
Cited by (9)
An examination on composition of spermatozoa obtained from pre-operative and post-operative varicocele patients
2018, Reproductive BiologyCitation Excerpt :Infertility is defined as the failure to conceive after at least one year of unprotected sexual intercourse due to issue in either the male or female [2]. Varicocele is one of the main and surgically repairable causes of male infertility due to valve failure, extensive dilatation, and torsion of the testicular veins in the plexus pampiniformis, and has been identified in 15–20% of adult males, 35–40% of males with primary infertility and 60–80% of males with secondary infertility [3–5]. Various studies have been carried out to investigate the mechanism by which varicocele causes infertility, and studies to date have suggested that increased testicular temperatures due to impaired micro circulation with a reflow of the blood in the testicular veins back into the testis, the accumulation of high amounts of certain metabolites and reduced oxygenation in dilated veins are all potential factors in the decreased count and impaired motility, morphological and chromosomal structure of spermatozoa associated with impaired fertilization capacity [5,6].
Predictors of microsurgical varicocelectomy efficacy in male infertility treatment: critical assessment and systematization
2023, Asian Journal of AndrologySemen parameter improvements after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair are durable for more than 12 months
2020, Canadian Urological Association Journal
Financial Disclosure: The authors declare that they have no relevant financial interests.
Funding Support: This study was financially supported by a grant from the vice chancellor for research, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (grant no. 753624).