Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 23, Issue 28, 25 May 2005, Pages 3657-3667
Vaccine

Combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis and polio vaccine (dTpa-IPV) for booster vaccination of adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.02.013Get rights and content

Abstract

Many countries recommend diphtheria, tetanus and/or poliomyelitis boosters in adolescents or adults and the need for pertussis booster vaccination beyond childhood is increasingly recognized. A new combined reduced-antigen-content dTpa-IPV vaccine provides booster vaccination against all four diseases in one single injection. The immunogenicity and safety of the dTpa-IPV vaccine was compared to that of licensed dTpa + IPV or Td-IPV vaccines in 806 adolescents >14 years of age and adults with a heterogeneous vaccination history. The dTpa-IPV vaccine was immunogenic and well tolerated. No clinically significant differences were observed between groups. Anti-tetanus antibody kinetics indicated that each of the vaccines could be used for tetanus prophylaxis in acute wound management. For all vaccines, the lowest post-vaccination antibody concentrations were observed in subjects >40 years of age, those seronegative prior to vaccination and those subjects whose last vaccination was ≥20 years ago. In conclusion, dTpa-IPV vaccination of subjects over 14 years of age was as immunogenic and well tolerated as the licensed dTpa + IPV or Td-IPV vaccines. Vaccination coverage of adults is poor and the use of combined vaccines such as dTpa-IPV during vaccination visits, or for wound management, maximizes opportunities for boosting in these difficult to reach age groups.

Introduction

Immunity against Bordetella pertussis disease wanes after both vaccination and natural infection [1], [2]. Although the incidence of pertussis in young children has decreased markedly since initiation of infant immunization programs, disease rates in older children, adolescents and adults in immunized populations are increasing [1], [3], [4]. In these age groups, pertussis results in considerable morbidity, but rarely leads to hospitalization or death [5], [6]. However, in parallel to increased disease in older age groups, increasing morbidity and mortality due to pertussis among infants is also reported in countries with high early childhood DTP vaccination coverage [7], [8], [9]. Although anti-pertussis antibodies may cross the placenta, circulating maternal antibodies on their own are not sufficient or do not reach levels that are high enough to result in passive protection after birth [10]. As a consequence, pertussis disease in young infants is often serious and life threatening, and the vast majority of deaths due to pertussis occur in infants too young to be fully immunized [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In a retrospective study in French paediatric intensive care units [14], pertussis was shown to be the first cause of mortality by bacterial infections in infants between 10 days and 2 months of age. Parents and older siblings have been identified as an important source of pertussis infection to unimmunized or partially immunized infants [14], [16], [17]. Therefore, vaccination of adolescents and adults against pertussis should provide a double protection: direct protection to vaccinees and indirect protection (herd immunity) to the at-risk infants with whom they are in contact.

Licensure of acellular pertussis vaccines with improved adverse event profiles compared to whole-cell pertussis combinations has allowed vaccination of older children and adults against pertussis for the first time [18], [19]. However, despite recognition that active prevention of pertussis in older populations is needed, until now, recommendations for pertussis boosting of older age groups only exist in a minority of countries [16], [20]. In addition, vaccination coverage in older age groups is generally poor even for well established antigens like diphtheria and tetanus for which regular vaccinations are necessary throughout life [21], [22], [23], [24] or polio that may be recommended during adolescence or adulthood in certain countries [22], [23], [25]. Vaccination coverage could be improved by the availability of combined vaccines that provide booster vaccination with all recommended antigens in a single injection [26]. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals has developed a combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis and poliomyelitis (dTpa-IPV, Boostrix® Polio) vaccine. This study evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a booster dose of dTpa-IPV in an adult population with a heterogeneous vaccination history, compared to licensed comparator vaccines.

Section snippets

Subjects and ethics

The study was conducted between January and April 2002. Healthy subjects older than 14 years of age, who had previously received primary vaccination against diphtheria and tetanus, were enrolled at multiple sites in Germany and France. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines and with approval of ethical review committees. All subjects (and their parents if they were under 18 years of age) gave witnessed, written, informed consent

Results

Eight hundred and six subjects (266 in the dTpa-IPV group and 270 each in the dTpa + IPV and Td-IPV groups) between the ages of 15 and 93 years were enrolled and vaccinated.

The mean time since the last vaccination with a diphtheria, tetanus, polio or pertussis containing vaccine was 13.9 years (S.D. 7.9 years) in subjects ≤40 years and 20.3 years (S.D. 13.2 years) in subjects >40 years of age.

There were no differences between French and German cohorts with respect to the mean time since the last

Discussion

The combined dTpa-IPV vaccine given as a booster dose to adolescents and adults was shown to be as immunogenic and well tolerated as the licensed dTpa (Boostrix™) and IPV (Poliorix™) vaccines administered separately, or as the licensed Td-IPV vaccine (Revaxis®). One month after administration of dTpa-IPV, more than 90% of recipients had a vaccine response to all three pertussis antigens. Post-vaccination anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibody concentrations indicative of protection were

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Debbie T. Daehnick (DT Medical Writing Corporation) for her help in the preparation of this manuscript.

References (33)

  • G. de Serres et al.

    Morbidity of pertussis in adolescents and adults

    J Infect Dis

    (2000)
  • C. Vitek et al.

    Increase in deaths from pertussis among young infants in the United States in the 1990s

    Pediatr Infect Dis J

    (2003)
  • A.M.S. Morris et al.

    Hospitalised pertussis in infancy

    J Paediatr Child Health

    (2002)
  • S. Stojanov et al.

    Hospitalization and complications in children under 2 years of age with Bordetella pertussis infection

    Infection

    (2000)
  • J. Bass et al.

    Do newborn infants have passive immunity to pertussis?

    Pediatr Infect Dis J

    (1989)
  • C. Smith et al.

    Early infantile pertussis: increasingly prevalent and potentially fatal

    Eur J Pediatr

    (2000)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Combination Vaccines

      2017, Plotkin's Vaccines
    • Poliovirus Vaccine–Inactivated

      2017, Plotkin's Vaccines
    • Immunization against pertussis in adolescents and adults

      2016, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, the vaccine was found to be immunogenic and effective in adolescents and adults. When administered to adults the dTap vaccine was found to be able to induce antibody levels not substantially different from those evoked in adolescents, with similar safety and tolerability [47–50]. Moreover, in a multicentre prospective study dTap administered to subjects aged 15–65 years was shown to have a protective effect of 95% against pertussis diagnosed by culture, serology or PCR [51,52].

    • Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a decennial booster dose of a combined reduced-antigen-content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus booster vaccine (dTpa-IPV) in healthy adults

      2015, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the age of these subjects, it is likely that they had already received one dose of oral polio vaccine in their childhood. For such adults, a single IPV booster is sufficient (as in the primary study [24]) and this additional booster dose was not needed for this trial population. Nevertheless, the safety of this additional booster dose was demonstrated and the anamnestic response was strong.

    • Intradermal fractional booster dose of inactivated poliomyelitis vaccine with a jet injector in healthy adults

      2013, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The non-inferiority margin was based upon a combination of statistical reasoning and clinical judgment [16]. We assumed that all participants would already have a titer well above the level that corresponds to seroprotection since they had received 6 previous polio vaccine doses [17,18]. That is why the between-group difference in the log2 GMC at day 28 was chosen as the primary endpoint for immunogenicity.

    • Poliovirus vaccine-inactivated

      2012, Vaccines: Sixth Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text