Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 25, Issue 5, 15 January 2007, Pages 814-824
Vaccine

Protective immune responses to a multi-gene DNA vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.09.043Get rights and content

Abstract

To investigate the strategy of using a multivalent polyprotein DNA vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus, a series of plasmids was used to immunize mice followed by infectious challenge. The plasmid vaccines expressed Clumping factor A (Clfa), fibronectin binding protein A (FnBPA) and the enzyme Sortase (Srt) as single proteins or combined as a polyprotein. All animals produced a mixed Th1 and Th2 response including functional antigen-specific, mostly IgG2a antibodies, sustained production of IFN-γ and a predominantly CD8+ T-cell response. Upon challenge with a virulent S. aureus isolate (Sa042), after 21 days, 55% of the multi-gene vaccinated mice survived infection compared to only 15% of the control groups. Vaccinated mice showed no signs of arthritis when challenged with the less virulent “Newman” strain that caused reactive arthritis in the controls. The results suggest that a multi-gene polyprotein-expressing nucleic acid vaccine alone produces a combined Th1 and Th2 response that can contribute to protection against the complex pathogenesis of S. aureus.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a common Gram-positive bacterium frequently found on the skin and in the tonsils where it is rarely pathogenic [1]. However, under circumstances of stress or weakened immunity, this bacterium can cause diverse diseases ranging from a mild skin condition to endocarditis, septic arthritis and even septicemia causing death. In the past, these infections were successfully treated with antibiotics. However, in the last 15 years, there has been an increase in the number and the virulence of antibiotic resistant strains of S. aureus commonly called the “super-bug”. These methicillin resistant strains, once confined to hospitals, have recently been found in the general community [2], [3]. Even more ominous are the reports of the isolation of vancomycin resistant strains, although at present they are still confined to hospitals [4].

Few persistent attempts were made to develop vaccines against human S. aureus while antibiotherapy was so successful. Yet, because of the economic importance of the S. aureus bovine mastitis, several bacterin-based vaccines were developed for the prevention of this disease. However, none of these early anti-mastitis vaccines has been consistently effective in preventing infection in cattle. More recently, many countries have adopted policies to reduce the use of antibiotics and consequently renewed efforts have been made to develop vaccines against both bovine and human S. aureus infections [5]. Promising results have been obtained using immunogenic derivatives of the bacterial capsular polysaccharide [5], [6] or using antigens associated with virulence and infectivity [7]. In this latter context, the major group of virulence factors, the bacterial adhesins, has been examined as vaccine candidates. Adhesin proteins such as fibrinogen(Clfa)-, fibrinonectin(FnBp)-, elastin(Eap)- and collagen(CNA)-binding proteins are responsible for the adherence of the bacterium to the extra-cellular matrix [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. Most of these proteins are cleaved by the protease sortase before being inserted into the cell wall. Sortase is specific for the LPXTG motif present on almost all adhesins [14], [15]. Studies using negative mutants for Clfa, Fnbp A and sortase A have shown reduced septic death and arthritis in mice [16], [17]. Subunit vaccines based on recombinant Clfa or FnBp or fused proteins such as Cna and FnBp [18], [19] have been reported to induce partially protective immune responses against S. aureus infection. However, each type of infection by S. aureus has its own characteristics. The principal way for S. aureus to enter the body is via the bloodstream so the bacteria have easy access to all organs to cause septicemia. In the case of septic arthritis the bacteria must penetrate the joint where it can proliferate in the synovial fluid causing inflammation, infiltration by polymorphonuclear cells and irreversible damage to bone and cartilage. To complicate the situation further, recent studies have confirmed that S. aureus is both an intra-cellular and extra-cellular pathogen [20], [21]. It has the ability to invade and replicate within neutrophils, osteoblasts, and mammary epithelial cells [22]. Bacteria ostensibly hidden from the antibody response may be reactivated when the cell dies and, in cattle, may be the cause of increased susceptibility to mastitis in animals that were thought to have recovered from the disease. These intra-cellular bacteria may also be the cause of chronic susceptibility to septic arthritis in patients who have been cured of obvious signs of infection [23], [24] Thus, an efficient vaccine would need to interfere with both the extra- and intra-cellular forms of the bacterium. A combined Th1 and Th2 response would thus be preferable against S. aureus since the vaccinated animal would be protected against both aspects of the pathogenesis. Previous studies that employed recombinant adhesion proteins as vaccines against S. aureus lead to a mostly humoral response and partial protection against infectious challenge [18], [25].

One of the emerging technologies that can potentially promote a mixed response, is DNA vaccination. Molecular adjuvants can be included as part of the plasmid in order to direct the immune response to the desired cytokine profile. This technology also allows incorporation of more than one antigen into the vaccine. DNA vaccination does not involve expensive recombinant technology or growth of large quantities of bacteria [26], [27]. However, DNA immunization is complicated because the immune response to these vaccines depends on several parameters: the structure of the antigen [28], the type of adjuvant included in the vaccine [29], [30], [31], the vaccine vehicle [32], [33] and the route of vaccine injection [28], [34]. Early successes for plasmid vaccination against viral diseases have been followed by reports of potentially protective vaccination against bacteria such as Clostridum botulinum[35], S. aureus MRSA [36], [37] and Mycobacterium tuberculosis[38], [39]. Recently, DNA vaccines against mastitis strains of S. aureus have been tested with some success by us using adhesin genes [40], [41] and by Kerro-Dego et al. [42] who targeted the cell surface proteins.

Only recently has the first DNA vaccine been approved for commercial use against West Nile Virus in horses because DNA vaccines are normally not very effective in large animals. Thus, most of the research in this field has focused on techniques which improve the efficiency of the immunization [27]. One of these optimization procedures has been the inclusion of multiple genes in the plasmid. This has been reported to induce better protection than a mixture of the individual plasmids [33], [38], [43]. The fusion of two antigens Ag85B and MPT64 in a multi-gene plasmid against M. tuberculosis elicited higher antibody and cytotoxic responses than individual genes [38]. The current project was designed to study the effects of multiple antigens expressed as a polyprotein by a multi-gene vaccine. This report describes the construction and characterization of DNA vaccines containing three genes: clfa, fnbp and sortase A. As previously mentioned, the three corresponding proteins have important roles in the development of S. aurens-induced septic arthritis and septicemia [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. These were cloned in separate plasmids and in a plasmid that expressed a single fusion polyprotein containing all three antigens. Mice were immunized with the plasmids and the immune responses were characterized. The results of this analysis and the protective effects of the vaccine on mouse models of septic arthritis and septicemia were compared in order to identify the effects of the multi-gene DNA vaccine strategy.

Section snippets

Animals and design

A mouse DNA vaccination model was used to identify the immune responses to a vaccine plasmid that expressed a polyprotein. A bacterial challenge model of systemic infection was used to identify the effects of immunization on the progression of the bacterial infection. CD-1 mice were used because they represent a good model for the study of septic arthritis and since they are outbred they give a better idea of the variability of the response.

Five groups of 25 female CD-1 mice (16–18 g, Charles

Eukaryotic expression of the genes

Photographs of the fluorescence from cells treated with the appropriate antibody and labeled with fluorescent second antibody demonstrated that the antibodies produced in rabbits against the three separate recombinant antigens were able to recognize the proteins expressed by COS-7 cells transfected with the appropriate three plasmids. This confirmed that the plasmids could drive functional expression of the cloned bacterial genes in eukaryotic cells. The epitopes on the fusion protein, encoded

Discussion

Each of the S. aureus target antigens in our vaccines plays a significant role in bacterial infection and should produce an immune response that alters the infective characteristics of the bacteria. The results demonstrated that the immune responses against all four plasmids were quite similar, being Th1-like with a significant production of IFN-γ compared with IL-4. This was confirmed by the higher levels of IgG2a antibodies as compared with IgG1 found for all four immunizations. Titers in the

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Eric Brouillette, Chantal Leblanc and Roseline Therrien for their assistance as well as Caroline Bergeron for taking care of the mice. We thank also Gilles Grondin for help with microscopy. We are grateful to Dr. François Malouin for providing the S. aureus strain SA042c. This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), Le Fond Quebecois de la recherche sur la nature et les technologies (FQRNT), Novalait and the Dairy and Swine

References (49)

  • Y. Perrie et al.

    Liposome-mediated DNA immunization via the subcutaneous route

    J Drug Target

    (2003)
  • A.M. Bennett et al.

    DNA vaccination protects against botulinum neurotoxin type F

    Vaccine

    (2003)
  • J.P.M. Senna et al.

    Protective immune response against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine model using a DNA vaccine approach

    Vaccine

    (2003)
  • A. Ohwada et al.

    DNA vaccination by a mecA sequence evokes an antimicrobial immune response against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

    J Antimicrob Chemo

    (1999)
  • E. Brouillette et al.

    DNA immunization against the clumping factor A (Clf A) of Staphylococcus aureus

    Vaccine

    (2002)
  • O.P. Kerro-Dego et al.

    DNA-protein immunization against the GapB and GapC proteins of a mastitis isolate of Staphylococcus aureus

    Vet Immunol Immunopathol

    (2006)
  • J.H. Guo et al.

    Construction and immunogenic characterization of a fusion anti-caries DNA vaccine against Pac and glucosyltransferase 1 of Streptococcus mutans

    J Dent Res

    (2004)
  • A. Abdelnour et al.

    Clonal expansion of T lymphocytes causes arthritis and mortality in mice infected with toxic shock syndrome toxin 1-producing staphylococci

    Eur J Immunol

    (1994)
  • J. Kluytmans et al.

    Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks

    Clin Microbiol Rev

    (1997)
  • R.A. Padmanabhan et al.

    The emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community

    Cleve Clin J Med

    (2005)
  • H.F. Chambers

    Community-associated MRSA-resistance and virulence converge

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • C.J. Whitener et al.

    Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of vancomycin exposure

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • H.R. Shinefield

    Use of a conjugate polysaccharide vaccine in the prevention of invasive staphylococcal disease: is an additional vaccine needed or possible?

    Vaccine

    (2006)
  • T. Weichhart et al.

    Functional selection of vaccine candidate peptides from Staphylococcus aureus whole-genome expression libraries in vitro

    Infect Immun

    (2003)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Bacterial adhesion

      2023, Molecular Medical Microbiology, Third Edition
    • Passive immunotherapy with specific IgG fraction against autolysin: Analogous protectivity in the MRSA infection with antibiotic therapy

      2019, Immunology Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      A previous study confirmed that these results, the increased levels of antibodies against r-autolysin, could intensify killing of S.aureus strain COL [14,31]. The principal way for S. aureus to enter the body is through the bloodstream because the bacteria have an easy access to all organs to cause septicemia [37]. Our present study demonstrated that passive immunization of mice with anti-autolysin IgG fraction significantly decreased the bacterial load in the internal organs and increased the survival rate as well as vancomycin treatment versus the control groups.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text