Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 27, Supplement 4, 5 November 2009, Pages D8-D15
Vaccine

Technical transformation of biodefense vaccines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.055Get rights and content

Abstract

Biodefense vaccines are developed against a diverse group of pathogens. Vaccines were developed for some of these pathogens a long time ago but they are facing new challenges to move beyond the old manufacturing technologies. New vaccines to be developed against other pathogens have to determine whether to follow traditional vaccination strategies or to seek new approaches. Advances in basic immunology and recombinant DNA technology have fundamentally transformed the process of formulating a vaccine concept, optimizing protective antigens, and selecting the most effective vaccine delivery approach for candidate biodefense vaccines.

Section snippets

Changes in manufacturing processes

Anthrax bioterrorism attack that ensued in the U.S. shortly after September 11, 2001 was the key turning point in the history of biodefense vaccine development. Suddenly, the need for biodefense vaccines became eminent and moved from the traditional military market (i.e., protecting soldiers from biological weapons) to one incorporating both military and public use. However, many problems associated with the production of early generations of biodefense vaccines were also exposed. Vaccines for

Correlates of immune protection

Traditionally, it has been postulated that vaccines are effective through the induction of protective antibodies in the host. In recent years, with the availability of more sophisticated biomarker assays that were initially developed for routine human vaccines, the roles of T cell immune responses have been better recognized in biodefense vaccine studies.

One surprising finding came from plague vaccine studies. Smiley and colleagues showed that B cell-deficient mice vaccinated with live

Subunit protein or gene-based vaccination approaches

Traditional biodefense vaccines were designed by using either live attenuated or inactivated vaccine approaches. As discussed in the above sections, live attenuated vaccines have the benefit of normally inducing stronger protective immunity than inactivated vaccines but are not ideal candidates when facing the challenges related to manufacturing processes or more critically, to improve the overall safety profile of biodefense vaccines. Furthermore, regulatory authorities expect to see the

Future outlook

Since 2001, biodefense vaccine development has experienced significant progress in the areas of manufacturing, immunological mechanisms and novel vaccination approaches. There are other unique issues not covered in this technology review but they are equally important for biodefense vaccine development. These include 1) “animal rule” which applies to vaccines unable to conduct a late phase large scale efficacy trial in humans due to the rare natural occurrence of such infections; 2)

Acknowledgement

Authors are supported in part by NIH NIAID grant U01AI078073.

References (142)

  • S. Wang et al.

    Cross-subtype antibody and cellular immune responses induced by a polyvalent DNA prime-protein boost HIV-1 vaccine in healthy human volunteers

    Vaccine

    (2008)
  • R.N. Brey

    Molecular basis for improved anthrax vaccines

    Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

    (2005)
  • J.E. Herrmann et al.

    Passive immunotherapy of Bacillus anthracis pulmonary infection in mice with antisera produced by DNA immunization

    Vaccine

    (2006)
  • Y.Z. Yu et al.

    Enhanced immune responses using plasmid DNA replicon vaccine encoding the Hc domain of Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin serotype A

    Vaccine

    (2007)
  • R.G. Jones et al.

    An improved method for development of toxoid vaccines and antitoxins

    Journal of Immunological Methods

    (2008)
  • M. Zeng et al.

    Protective immunity against botulism provided by a single dose vaccination with an adenovirus-vectored vaccine

    Vaccine

    (2007)
  • R.W. Titball et al.

    Vaccination against bubonic and pneumonic plague

    Vaccine

    (2001)
  • J.A. Chichester et al.

    A single component two-valent LcrV-F1 vaccine protects non-human primates against pneumonic plague

    Vaccine

    (2009)
  • S.E. Leary et al.

    Expression of an F1/V fusion protein in attenuated Salmonella typhimurium and protection of mice against plague

    Microbial Pathogenesis

    (1997)
  • S. Wang et al.

    A DNA vaccine producing LcrV antigen in oligomers is effective in protecting mice from lethal mucosal challenge of plague

    Vaccine

    (2004)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Relative immunogenicity and protection potential of candidate Yersinia Pestis antigens against lethal mucosal plague challenge in Balb/C mice

    Vaccine

    (2008)
  • H.M. El Sahly et al.

    Safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity of Francisella tularensis live vaccine strain in humans

    Vaccine

    (2009)
  • M. Estevan et al.

    Experiments on a sub-unit vaccine encapsulated in microparticles and its efficacy against Brucella melitensis in mice

    Vaccine

    (2006)
  • R. Vemulapalli et al.

    Enhanced efficacy of recombinant Brucella abortus RB51 vaccines against B. melitensis infection in mice

    Veterinary Microbiology

    (2004)
  • B.N. Neeson et al.

    Analysis of protection afforded by a Clostridium perfringens alpha-toxoid against heterologous clostridial phospholipases C

    Microbial Pathogenesis

    (2007)
  • E.D. Williamson et al.

    A genetically engineered vaccine against the alpha-toxin of Clostridium perfringens protects mice against experimental gas gangrene

    Vaccine

    (1993)
  • J.W. Sumner et al.

    Protection of guinea-pigs from experimental Rocky Mountain spotted fever by immunization with baculovirus-expressed Rickettsia rickettsii rOmpA protein

    Vaccine

    (1995)
  • R.A. Mason et al.

    A reference, inactivated, epidemic typhus vaccine: clinical trials in man

    Journal of Biological Standardization

    (1976)
  • R.N. Greenberg et al.

    Safety and immunogenicity of new cell-cultured smallpox vaccine compared with calf-lymph derived vaccine: a blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • R.B. Kennedy et al.

    The immunology of smallpox vaccines

    Current Opinion in Immunology

    (2009)
  • P. Sakhatskyy et al.

    Immunogenicity and protection efficacy of subunit-based smallpox vaccines using variola major antigens

    Virology

    (2008)
  • P. Sakhatskyy et al.

    Immunogenicity and protection efficacy of monovalent and polyvalent poxvirus vaccines that include the D8 antigen

    Virology

    (2006)
  • K. Yamanishi et al.

    Development of inactivated vaccine against virus causing haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome

    Vaccine

    (1988)
  • J.W. Hooper et al.

    Hantaan/Andes virus DNA vaccine elicits a broadly cross-reactive neutralizing antibody response in nonhuman primates

    Virology

    (2006)
  • C.S. Schmaljohn et al.

    Preparation of candidate vaccinia-vectored vaccines for haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome

    Vaccine

    (1992)
  • A. Bukreyev et al.

    Chimeric human parainfluenza virus bearing the Ebola virus glycoprotein as the sole surface protein is immunogenic and highly protective against Ebola virus challenge

    Virology

    (2009)
  • M. Hevey et al.

    Antigenicity and vaccine potential of Marburg virus glycoprotein expressed by baculovirus recombinants

    Virology

    (1997)
  • M. Hevey et al.

    Marburg virus vaccines: comparing classical and new approaches

    Vaccine

    (2001)
  • D.A. Henderson et al.

    Smallpox and vaccinia

  • L.F. Mora et al.

    Cardiac complications after smallpox vaccination

    Southern Medical Journal

    (2009)
  • U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Withdrawal of rotavirus vaccine recommendation. MMWR...
  • N. Kingsbury

    Anthrax vaccine: changes to manufacturing process

    US GAO Testimony

    (2001)
  • R.N. Greenberg et al.

    ACAM2000: a newly licensed cell culture-based live vaccinia smallpox vaccine

    Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs

    (2008)
  • D. Lu et al.

    Pulmonary vaccine delivery

    Expert Review of Vaccines

    (2007)
  • E. Hoffmann et al.

    A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2000)
  • G. Neumann et al.

    Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (1999)
  • M.A. Parent et al.

    Cell-mediated protection against pulmonary Yersinia pestis infection

    Infection and Immunity

    (2005)
  • I.M. Belyakov et al.

    Shared modes of protection against poxvirus infection by attenuated and conventional smallpox vaccine viruses

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2003)
  • W.E. Demkowicz et al.

    Human cytotoxic T-cell memory: long-lived responses to vaccinia virus

    Journal of Virology

    (1996)
  • E.D. Williamson et al.

    Human immune response to a plague vaccine comprising recombinant F1 and V antigens

    Infection and Immunity

    (2005)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Vaccines for Healthcare Personnel

      2017, Plotkin's Vaccines
    • The use of nanolipoprotein particles to enhance the immunostimulatory properties of innate immune agonists against lethal influenza challenge

      2013, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      For many of these organisms, efficacious therapies are not available or not optimal in the event of a bioterror attack or acute disease emergence. Vaccines, long considered the gold standard medical countermeasure for disease prevention, may not be available, or not suitable for widespread administration to the general public due to safety concerns [2]. Similarly, antimicrobial compounds may be insufficient to counter a wide range of unknown, deliberately altered, or drug-resistant pathogens and can potentially lead to resistance.

    • Vaccines for health care personnel

      2012, Vaccines: Sixth Edition
    View full text