Enhancement of protein vaccine potency by in vivo electroporation mediated intramuscular injection
Introduction
Antigen-specific immunotherapy using protein-based vaccines has emerged as a potentially promising approach for the generation of antigen-specific immune responses. In general, protein-based vaccines are safe and have the ability to bypass MHC restriction (for reviews see [1], [2]). Various protein-based vaccines have been tested in clinical trials and found to be safe and well tolerated [3], [4], [5]. However, they are weakly immunogenic and usually induce low level of CTL responses [6], [7]. Consequently, most of the research in this area has focused on the identification of innovative adjuvants to enhance protein-based vaccine potency in generating antigen-specific CD8+ T cells (for review, see [8]).
One approach to enhance protein-based vaccine potency is the employment of “danger” signals such as toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands that stimulate dendritic cells to mature and differentiate into potent activators of antigen-specific T cells (for review, see [9]). It is clear that TLRs play a crucial role in enhancing innate and adaptive immune responses (for reviews, see [10], [11], [12], [13]). TLR ligands have emerged as a promising new class of vaccine adjuvants, particularly the oligodeoxynucleotides containing one or more unmethylated CpG dinucleotides (CpG-ODNs), which target TLR9 [14]. It has been shown that CpG-ODNs can stimulate innate immunity and confer protection against a variety of bacterial and viral infections [15], [16]. CpG-ODNs have previously been used in combination with protein-based vaccines to improve vaccine potency in several studies [17], [18], [19]. In fact, CpG ODNs have been employed in combination with HPV-16 E7 long peptide-based vaccines to generate significant antitumor effects against E7-expressing tumors [20].
Another strategy for increasing protein-based vaccine potency is to identify methods for retaining the protein for slow release into the immune system. We reasoned that a method capable of improving the delivery of protein-based vaccine intramuscularly may potentially lead to the slow release of the protein, resulting in improved vaccine potency. In the current study, we have employed electroporation to improve the delivery of protein-based vaccines into muscle cells. Electroporation has been used to improve transfection efficiency of DNA into muscle cells to improve DNA vaccine potency [21], [22], [23]. Electroporation involves the administration of the vaccine into the muscle by needle injection, followed by a brief electrical pulse to the surrounding tissue. A transient increase in the permeability of the plasma membrane induced by the electrical current allows increased uptake of the DNA plasmid [24], [25]. Thus, the technology may potentially be used to improve the uptake of protein-based vaccines by muscle cells.
In the current study, we plan to determine whether intramuscular injection of protein-based vaccines in conjunction with CpG followed by electroporation can lead to increased delivery of the protein-based vaccine into muscle cells to enhance protein-based vaccine potency. We found that intramuscular injection followed by electroporation can most effectively transduce the protein-based vaccine into the muscle cells. Furthermore, we found that intramuscular vaccination with OVA protein in combination with CpG followed by electroporation generates the best OVA-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses as well as the best protective and therapeutic antitumor effects in vaccinated mice. CD8+ T cells were found to play an important role in the observed protective antitumor effects generated by the vaccination. Similar results were observed using the HPV-16 E7 protein-based vaccination system. Thus, our data indicate that intramuscular administration of protein-based vaccines in conjunction with CpG followed by electroporation can significantly enhance the antigen-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses. The clinical implications of the study are discussed.
Section snippets
Mice
Six- to eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD). All animal procedures were performed according to approved protocols and in accordance with recommendations for the proper use and care of laboratory animals.
Cells
The OVA-expressing murine tumor model, B16-OVA, has been described previously [26]. This cell line was cultured in vitro in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 50 units/ml of penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM
ELISA
The presence of anti-ovalbumin Ab's in the sera was characterized by a direct ELISA as described previously [33]. Mice were immunized as described above. Sera were prepared from mice on day 7 after final immunization. The ELISA plate was read with a standard ELISA reader at 450 nm.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.) and are representative of at least two separate experiments. Results for intracellular cytokine staining with flow cytometry analysis and tumor treatment experiments were evaluated by analysis of variance (ANOVA). In the tumor protection experiments, the principal outcome measure was time to tumor development. All analyses were performed in SAS version 9.2 (SAS institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and the significance level was set at 0.05.
Results
Vaccination with OVA protein in combination with CpG via electroporation generates the best OVA-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses
In order to determine which route of vaccination can generate the best OVA-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses, C57BL/6 mice (three per group) were vaccinated with OVA protein with or without CpG via subcutaneous injection or intramuscular injection with or without electroporation. As shown in Fig. 1A and B, mice vaccinated intramuscularly with 1 μg of OVA
Discussion
In the current study, we found that intramuscular vaccination with OVA protein in combination with CpG via electroporation generated the best OVA-specific CD8+ T cell immune responses and protective and therapeutic antitumor effects in vaccinated mice. Intramuscular vaccination followed by electroporation was found to effectively transduce the protein-based vaccine into muscle cells. We showed that CD8+ T cells play an important role in the observed protective antitumor effects generated by
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute SPORE programs (P50 CA098252 and P50 CA96784-06), 1 RO1 CA114425-01 and 1 P20 CA144801.
References (37)
- et al.
Vaccination with HPV16 peptides of patients with advanced cervical carcinoma: clinical evaluation of a phase I–II trial
Eur J Cancer
(1999) Toll-like receptors and innate immunity
Adv Immunol
(2001)- et al.
CpG-DNA protects against a lethal orthopoxvirus infection in a murine model
Antiviral Res
(2005) - et al.
A protein-based smallpox vaccine protects mice from vaccinia and ectromelia virus challenges when given as a prime and single boost
Vaccine
(2007) - et al.
Optimised electroporation mediated DNA vaccination for treatment of prostate cancer
Genetic Vaccines Ther
(2010) - et al.
Induction of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes by electroporation-enhanced needle-free skin immunization
Vaccine
(2006) - et al.
Administration of HPV DNA vaccine via electroporation elicits the strongest CD8+ T cell immune responses compared to intramuscular injection and intradermal gene gun delivery
Vaccine
(2009) - et al.
Therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccines: current clinical trials and future directions
Expert Opin Biol Ther
(2008) - et al.
Opportunities to improve the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer
Curr Mol Med
(2007) - et al.
Detection of T helper responses, but not of human papillomavirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses, after peptide vaccination of patients with cervical carcinoma
J Immunother
(2000)