Prevalence and potential risk factors for organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in Boophilus microplus ticks on cattle ranches from the State of Yucatan, Mexico

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.069Get rights and content

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was carried out in order to investigate the association between management risk factors and the prevalence of organophosphate (OP) and synthetic pyrethroid (SP) resistance in Boophilus microplus ticks in Yucatan State, Mexico. Ninety-eight cattle ranches were randomly selected and a sample of 20–30 engorged female B. microplus ticks was collected at each. The modified larvae packet test was used to detect OP and SP tick resistance. A questionnaire was administered on each ranch. For risk factors, four reference types of response were used: Tuxpan (resistant to coumaphos, chlorfenvinphos and diazinon), Parkhurst (resistant to flumethrin, deltamethrin and cypermethrin), Lamington (resistant to flumethrin in absence of deltamethrin and cypermethrin) and Marmor (resistant to flumethrin and cypermethrin in absence of flumethrin). A primary screening was performed using 2 × 2 contingency tables of exposure variables. All variables with p  0.20 were analyzed by a logistic regression. The prevalence of B. microplus resistance to OP and SP groups were 83.70% and 66.32%, respectively. The prevalence for a single chemical compound was: diazinon (80.60%), coumaphos (45.90%), chlorfenvinphos (35.70%), flumethrin (63.28%), deltamethrin (61.22%), and cypermethrin (59.18%). The prevalence type of response was: Tuxpan (34.16%), Parkhurst (58.16%), Lamington (4.08%), and Marmor (4.08%). The use of a different tick control program was the risk management factor associated with the Parkhurst type of response. It is concluded that the prevalence of cattle ranches with B. microplus resistant to OPs and SPs in Yucatan, Mexico, is a current problem, and a treatment interval of ≥6 times/year and use of a tick control program (macrocyclic lactones and pasture burn) different from standard recommended programs are risk factors associated with the Parkhurst type of response.

Introduction

Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) is an endemic cattle pest in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, causing major economic losses to cattle producers through direct physical effects on the parasitized animal and indirectly through diseases transmitted by the tick's bite (Solorio et al., 1999).

Acaricides, including organophosphates (OP), synthetic pyrethroids (SP), amidines and macrocyclic lactones (Taylor, 2001, Aguilar-Tipacamu and Rodriguez-Vivas, 2003) play a major role in controlling Boophilus ticks in Mexico and the intensive use of these chemicals has led to the development of resistant tick populations (Fragoso et al., 1995).

In Mexico, resistance of B. microplus to OP and chlorinated hydrocarbon acaricides was first documented in 1981, 7 years after intensive use was instigated. It was demonstrated that the prevalence of the resistance was higher in the eastern and northeastern region of Mexico, and therefore the federal authorities of the Animal Health Division in 1986 authorized the use of SPs and recently, amidines, as an alternative to control OP resistant ticks (Aguirre and Santamaría, 1986). Seven years later, in 1993, the first cases of SP resistance were detected by the larval packet test with discriminating doses (Stone & Haydock); and B. microplus-resistant strains were identified as co-resistant to SPs and OPs, with a wide geographical distribution in the livestock regions of the Gulf of Mexico, northeastern and southern Tamaulipas, eastern San Luis Potosi, southeastern Tabasco, northeastern Chiapas, and all of the State of Veracruz (Ortiz et al., 1995). However, in southeastern Mexico, no epidemiological study has yet been carried out. For this reason, a cross-sectional study was performed in order to investigate the possible association between management risk factors and the prevalence of B. microplus resistant to OPs and SPs in cattle ranches from the State of Yucatan, Mexico.

Section snippets

Study background

The State of Yucatan is located in the southeast of Mexico between the co-ordinates 19°30′ and 21°35′ north latitude and 90°24′ west longitude. The climate of the state is sub-humid tropical with a summer rainy season. The monthly maximum temperature varies from 35 °C to 40 °C and the mean temperature is 26.6 °C. The relative humidity (RH) varies from 65% to 100% (mean RH is 80%) and the annual rainfall varies from 415 mm to 1290 mm depending on the area. There are two distinct seasons: rainy (from

Questionnaire survey

The questionnaire survey described the management practices of ranchers from Yucatan, Mexico. With regard to ranch size, 29.6% of the ranches had <50 animals, 27.6% had 50–100 animals, 21.4% had 101–200 animals and 21.4% had >200 animals. In relation with stocking density, 73.5% of the ranches had ≤1 animal/ha and 26.5% had >1 animal/ha. A large proportion of ranches (79.6%) used crossbred Bos indicus, 16.3% Bos indicus and 4.1% Bos taurus.

All ranches used acaricides to control ticks. With

Discussion

The present study is the first in Mexico to detect the prevalence and possible risk factors associated with OP and SP resistance in B. microplus using a simple random sampling model. In Mexico, the presence of resistance to OP and SP acaricides has developed within a period of approximately 7 years of intensive use of different classes of acaricides (Ortiz et al., 1995).

In the present study, the prevalence of B. microplus resistance in Yucatan to OPs tested was 83.7%. This prevalence is higher

Acknowledgments

This project was founded by CONACYT-SAGARPA Mexico (SAGARPA-2002-C01-1754). We are very grateful to CONACYT for supporting Miguel Alonso-Diaz and Flavio Rodriguez-Arevalo in their Masters Degree course. Thanks are also due to the ranchers (UGROY and UGRY) who generously gave their time and hospitality. The authors gratefully acknowledge the technical assistance of the staff of the Centro Nacional de Servicios de Constatación en Salud Animal, SAGARPA, Jiutepec, Morelos. Our thanks to Dr. Phil

References (30)

  • CIAPY

    Cultivos importantes para la diversificación agrícola en la península de Yucatán

    (1970)
  • Dean, A.G., Dean, J.A., Coumbier, D., Brendel, K.A., Smith, D.C., Burton, A.H., Dicker, R.C., Sullivan, D., Fagan,...
  • S.H. Fragoso et al.

    Epidemiología de la resistencia a ixodicidas en garrapatas Boophilus microplus en la República Mexicana

  • J. Furlong

    Diagnóstico de la susceptibilidad de la garrapata del ganado Boophilus microplus a los acaricidas en el estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil

  • S. Hagen et al.

    Estudios de resistencia a acaricidas en la garrapata bovina Boophilus microplus en América central

  • Cited by (111)

    • Resistance in ectoparasites

      2022, Insect Resistance Management: Biology, Economics, and Prediction, Third Edition
    • Monitoring the resistance of Rhipicephalus microplus to amitraz, flumethrin, coumaphos, and ivermectin on cattle farms in Mexico

      2021, Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite the fewer number of farms with high resistance level to permethrin in this study, collateral resistance with other molecules of the same family is expected. Cypermethrin and deltamethrin have been used in Mexico to control ticks on cattle and collateral resistance were detected in previous studies in Mexico (Rodriguez-Vivas et al., 2006a). The mode of action of SP might explain the collateral resistance.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text