Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 80, Issues 1–2, July–August 2013, Pages 173-178
World Neurosurgery

Peer-Review Report
A Radiographic Analysis of Ventricular Trajectories

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.12.012Get rights and content

Background

The prevalent method of ventriculostomy placement is via freehand insertion to cannulate the ventricle at a 90° angle to the skull to get ideal placement. Our goal was to test the validity of this practice in patients without midline shift and with normal ventricular size.

Methods

This study was a virtual radiographic analysis of 3-dimensional data of skull and ventricular anatomy. Data were collected using thin-cut (1-mm) computed tomography scans of 101 randomly selected patients with normal ventricular anatomy. Virtual ventriculostomy trajectories were determined for entry from the right and left sides separately, going in at a 90° angle to the skull. Three-dimensional multiplanar reconstructions were performed using Osirix software to see where the catheter would end up within the brain.

Results

In our patient population, the mean bicaudate index was 0.14. Of the 202 perpendicular lines created from Kocher's point into the brain, 67.8% (137) of the virtual lines passed through the ipsilateral frontal horn of the lateral ventricle, 20.8% (42) passed through the contralateral ventricle, and 10.4% (21) did not pass through a ventricular space. A lower bicaudate index also leads to a greater misplacement even with a perpendicular trajectory. Pushing a catheter beyond an entry length of 6.5 cm if no cerebrospinal fluid flow has been obtained will not result in ipsilateral ventricular catheterization.

Conclusions

Our study concludes that not all catheters passed through Kocher's point using a perpendicular trajectory will end up in the ipsilateral frontal horn, and almost 10% of these catheters will be in a nonventricular space. In the instance in which a freehand pass fails to cannulate a ventricle, the safest alternative would be to make only minor adjustments to the perpendicular angle.

Introduction

Ventriculostomy placement is a common neurosurgical procedure used to measure intracranial pressure, drainage of excess cerebrospinal fluid, intraventricular instillation of drugs, and monitoring of carcinomatous and fungal meningitidis. Over the last few decades, the indications for ventricular drainage have expanded to include hydrocephalus, subarachnoid hemorrhage, Reye syndrome, central nervous system bacterial infections, intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial hypertension, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (7). In the past, ventriculostomies usually were performed on patients who had large ventricles or hydrocephalus. Those performed on patients with small ventricular anatomy were done for elective reasons, and stereotactic equipment could be used with the luxury of time. With the advent of Brain Trauma Foundation guidelines for monitoring patients with severe TBI (2) and the Clot Lysis: Evaluating Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage (CLEAR IVH) (3) trial, it has become apparent that several ventriculostomy procedures now need to be performed on patients without hydrocephalus in an emergent manner at the bedside.

Despite all of the data showing a high rate of misplacement with a freehand technique 5, 6, 13, the prevalent method of ventriculostomy placement continues to be via freehand insertion using surface anatomical landmarks. Although extraventricular drain complications have been studied thoroughly, the accuracy of extraventricular drain positioning has been audited only occasionally. Both residents and practicing neurosurgeons admit to frequently using multiple passes and frequent catheter misplacement 10, 11. It is common practice to attempt cannulation of the ventricle at a 90° angle to the skull to get ideal placement in the ipsilateral frontal horn of the lateral ventricle near the foramen of Monro. From the available data, it is apparent that cannulating ventricles in patients with hydrocephalus or with a large bicaudate index (BCI) is easier, with a higher success rate (13). The BCI is defined as the ratio of the width of both lateral ventricles at the level of the heads of the caudate nuclei to the distance between the inner tables of the skull at the same level. Therefore, the challenge of placing ventriculostomy catheters is usually in patients with a small to normal BCI. Our study aims to test the validity of the traditional teaching that in patients with normal ventricular size and no midline shift, the use of the Ghajar guide or of surface landmarks to obtain a perpendicular pass into the ventricle is indeed the best option. We also analyze the previous studies performed that display the current experience regarding the accuracy of ventriculostomy procedures.

Section snippets

Methods

Our study is an analysis of data obtained from virtual radiographic 3-dimensional (3D) skull and ventricular anatomy. No ventriculostomy was performed on real patients. Data were collected using thin-cut (1-mm) computed tomography (CT) scans of 101 randomly selected adult patients with normal ventricular anatomy. Virtual ventriculostomy trajectories were determined for entry from the right and left sides separately, going in at a 90° angle to the skull. A software plug-in was created for the

Results

Data were collected using thin-cut (1-mm) CT scans of the head of 101 randomly selected patients with normal ventricular anatomy. In our patient population, the mean BCI, which is the ratio of the width of both lateral ventricles at the level of the heads of the caudate nuclei to the distance between the inner tables of the skull at the same level, was 0.14. Mean catheter entry length, combined for both left and right sides, was 5.41 cm (SD 0.573, range 3.8 to 7.1 cm).

Ideal ventriculostomy

Discussion

In 1985, Dr. Ghajar described a novel device that allowed catheterization of the ventricles by making a pass perpendicular to the calvarium (4). He reported CSF flow with the first attempt for all patients. A postplacement imaging confirmation was obtained on 11 of the 17 patients, demonstrating ipsilateral frontal horn placement. In 2000, O'Leary et al. (10) also reported use of the Ghajar guide vs a freehand technique and found that although the clinical significance of improved cannulation

Conclusions

Our study is unique in concept and execution. It provides evidence-based recommendations to deal with a common neurosurgical dilemma that accosts multiple practicing neurosurgeons and residents daily and can lead to devastating complications. We provide a simple, cost-effective, and convenient solution that can impact tens of thousands of people annually. An important limitation of our study is its virtual nature, thus eliminating human error. For this reason it would be difficult to compare

References (13)

  • R.C.E. Anderson et al.

    Complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in children with head trauma

    J Neurosurg

    (2004)
  • S.L. Bratton et al.

    Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury

    J Neurotrauma

    (2007)
  • B.R. O'Neill et al.

    A survey of ventriculostomy and intracranial pressure monitor placement practices

    Surg Neurol

    (2008)
  • W.A. Friedman et al.

    Percutaneous tunnel ventriculostomy: summary of 100 procedures

    J Neurosurg

    (1980)
  • J.B. Ghajar

    A guide for ventricular catheter placement. Technical note

    J Neurosurg

    (1985)
  • D.R. Huyette et al.

    Accuracy of the freehand pass technique for ventriculostomy catheter placement: retrospective assessment using computed tomography scans

    J Neurosurg

    (2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (30)

  • Morphometric analysis of Kocher's and Frazier's points in a small sample taken from the South African scaphocephalic paediatric population: A preliminary study

    2022, Translational Research in Anatomy
    Citation Excerpt :

    A ventriculostomy is a routinely used emergency neurosurgical procedure that entails the drilling of a burr hole into the skull and the subsequent catheterization of one of the ventricles of the brain for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes in ICP monitoring and CSF drainage [13,14]. Common indications for emergency ventricular access include hydrocephalus, ICH, subarachnoid and intracranial haemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury [13,15,16]. A ventriculostomy is usually performed freehand using cranial surface anatomical landmarks to identify the optimal entry site for ventricular cannulation [13].

  • Ideal trajectory for frontal ventriculostomy: Radiological study and anatomical study

    2022, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Until today, no rapid, reliable, practical, and inexpensive method, that could replace freehand ventriculostomy, has been found. [21] Indeed the freehand technique with a perpendicular trajectory to outer cranial table is the most commonly used. [1,7–11,13,17,22,31,32] Althought the anatomical landmarks, needed to establish the perpendicular path, are covered by surgical drapes and, sometimes, difficult to locate during the catheter insertion, therefore, the perfect trajectory toward the target point is challenging to obtain.

  • Orthogonal external ventricular drain (EVD) trajectory from burr holes sited by junior neurosurgical staff is superior to freehand placement: An in-silico model

    2021, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
    Citation Excerpt :

    The skull and the lateral ventricles are organised in a concentric manner, therefore a tangent drawn to the skull, is also a tangent corresponding to the position of the ventricle. A trajectory perpendicular to this tangent will provide optimal placement of the EVD catheter, as compared to other landmark based methods [2,15–18]. There have been previous attempts to create simple guidance devices to enhance the accuracy of EVD placement using this principle [19,20].

  • Common Trajectories for Freehand Frontal Ventriculostomy: A Systematic Review

    2021, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Gautschi et al.24 performed ventriculostomy on cadaver heads and recorded intraventricular placement in 36 of 52 (69%) cases when adhering to the technique described by Friedman and Vries25 targeting the IMC. Rehman et al.26 described a 67.8% rate of catheterization of the ipsilateral lateral ventricle when passing the catheter perpendicular to the skull and notably only a 10.4% rate of extraventricular placement; the remaining 20.8% catheterized the contralateral ventricle. Park et al.27 radiologically assessed 66 normal CT scans, and evaluated the accuracy of 3 separate targets in the coronal plane; the IMC, CMC, and midpoint between the bilateral medial canthi (MP) against a sagittal trajectory toward the external auditory meatus.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest statement: The first author of this article (T.R.) is also the CEO of ARC Surgicals, a company that holds the patent for a ventriculostomy guidance system.

View full text