Elsevier

World Neurosurgery

Volume 82, Issue 5, November 2014, Pages 672-677
World Neurosurgery

Peer-Review Report
Risk Profile In Extracranial/Intracranial Bypass Surgery—The Role of Antiplatelet Agents, Disease Pathology, and Surgical Technique In 168 Direct Revascularization Procedures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2013.06.010Get rights and content

Objective

Cerebral revascularization procedures are a treatment option in moyamoya disease patients, but recent studies failed to show an immediate benefit in cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease. To facilitate optimal efficacy of the procedure, a detailed characterization of a representative perioperative complication rate and the role of potential risk factors such as underlying pathology, antiplatelet therapy, and the type of surgery performed is warranted and the purpose of this study.

Methods

We included 158 consecutive patients with moyamoya disease or cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease undergoing 168 direct revascularization procedures. Type of disease, antiplatelet therapy, coagulation disorders, surgical technique, intraoperative complications, postoperative imaging, the need for revision, and outcome at time of discharge were analyzed.

Results

Complication rate was low, with a high patency rate of 97%. Six hemispheres (3.6%) needed to undergo surgical revision; early morbidity was 10.7% with no mortality, with evidence of ischemia in 6.9% of patients. Type of pathology treated and surgical technique did not influence outcome. Antiplatelet treatment was not associated with an increased risk for hemorrhage or revision, but improved outcome (P < 0.05). Ischemia, hemorrhage, and the need for revision aggravated outcome at time of discharge.

Conclusion

Extra-/intracranial bypass surgery remains a treatment option in patients with moyamoya disease, although its use in the context of atherosclerotic disease was recently put into question. Regardless, a detailed characterization of perioperative risk factors is needed to optimize a potential long-term benefit of surgery. At a high-volume center, the complication rate is low independent from the underlying pathology with a high patency rate. Antiplatelet treatment does not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications, but may improve outcome. Longer follow-up is required to adequately assess the true efficacy of revascularization on stroke prevention.

Introduction

Revascularization procedures, and extra-/intracranial (EC-IC) bypass surgery in particular (Figure 1), were originally devised to treat patients with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion (9). The EC-IC bypass trial in 1985 (5), however, demonstrated that broad application of this procedure based on angiographic and clinical findings alone does not improve outcome, compared to conservative treatment alone. Later studies provided evidence that specific, high-risk subgroups of patients may still be amenable to surgical intervention and that stricter selection criteria are crucial to effectively filter those patients at highest risk for impending ischemic stroke, despite maximized medical treatment. Patients with angiographic evidence of cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease (CAD) or moyamoya disease (MMD) may present with a history of (mostly transitory) neurologic events and borderzone infarctions on recent imaging. However, one of the most important selection criteria—which was not included in the EC-IC bypass trial—is evidence of cerebrovascular hemodynamic insufficiency, as the risk of future stroke increases dramatically (15), oftentimes despite aggressive antiplatelet treatment and high-normal blood pressure management. Hemodynamic insufficiency or the failure of an adequate response to a vasodilatory stimulus as characterized by the cerebrovascular reserve capacity constitutes a mandatory selection criterion (12), and EC-IC bypasses have repeatedly been shown to effectively improve cerebrovascular reserve capacity 3, 13.

As more data such as those from the recent Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS) study emerge (11), questioning the immediate efficacy of bypass surgery to reduce stroke risk in atherosclerotic patients and at the same time pointing out the inherent perioperative risks of the procedure, it is not only of the essence to define and agree on the most appropriate selection criteria. Although an evaluation of selection criteria particularly for patients with CAD is beyond the scope of this study, it is mandatory to determine a representative and likely more detailed complication rate of the surgical procedure itself in dedicated neurovascular centers as well as the association with potential risk factors, in order to optimize a potential long-term benefit over medical treatment alone.

It is the purpose of this observational analysis to describe the complication rate at our institution, and—as a next step—to identify a potential association with variables such as surgical technique, disease pathology (CAD vs. MMD), and antiplatelet treatment.

Section snippets

Material and Methods

For this purpose, we retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing a direct revascularization procedure at the Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany. To be considered for a surgical procedure at our institution, among other considerations patients have to have evidence of recurrent ischemic symptoms with watershed but not territorial infarctions on magnetic resonance imaging, with the last neurologic event more than 6 weeks ago. Patients

Results

Of a total of 280 revascularization procedures performed on 246 patients at our institution from 2004 to 2009, only 158 patients (mean age 51.4 ± 13.2 years) undergoing a total of 168 direct revascularization procedures (demographic data, Table 2) were eligible for inclusion into this particular analysis, and only CAD or MMD patients were considered for our risk stratification. Of the remaining patients, all of the above-mentioned criteria were observed and complete data sets were available for

Discussion

The EC-IC bypass procedure was originally devised to reduce the subsequent stroke rate in patients with cerebral artery stenosis or occlusion 14, 17. Moyamoya patients in particular constitute an entity where surgical revascularization remains the most effective mainstay of treatment 6, 8, 10. Recently, the COSS study failed to show a significant improvement in outcome for patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic internal carotid artery occlusion when EC-IC bypass surgery was added to best

Conclusion

EC-IC bypass surgery remains a treatment option in patients with MMD, although its use in the context of atherosclerotic disease was recently put into question. Regardless, a detailed characterization of perioperative risk factors is needed to optimize a potential long-term surgical benefit. At a high-volume center, the complication rate is low with a high rate of successful primary revascularization. The risk profile is comparable for patients with MMD and CAD. EMS does not aggravate the risk

References (17)

  • R.H. Hongo et al.

    The effect of clopidogrel in combination with aspirin when given before coronary artery bypass grafting

    J Am Coll Cardiol

    (2002)
  • S. Amin-Hanjani et al.

    EC-IC bypass for stroke—is this the end of the line or a bump in the road?

    Neurosurgery

    (2012)
  • A.P. Carlson et al.

    Failure of cerebral hemodynamic selection in general or of specific positron emission tomography methodology? Carotid Occlusion Surgery Study (COSS)

    Stroke

    (2011)
  • M. Czabanka et al.

    Characterization of direct and indirect cerebral revascularization for the treatment of European patients with moyamoya disease

    Cerebrovasc Dis

    (2011)
  • C.P. Derdeyn et al.

    Compensatory mechanisms for chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in patients with carotid occlusion

    Stroke

    (1999)
  • Failure of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke. Results of an international randomized trial. The EC/IC Bypass Study Group

    N Engl J Med

    (1985)
  • J.S. Han et al.

    Impact of extracranial-intracranial bypass on cerebrovascular reactivity and clinical outcome in patients with symptomatic moyamoya vasculopathy

    Stroke

    (2011)
  • P. Horn et al.

    Risk of intraoperative ischemia due to temporary vessel occlusion during standard extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass surgery

    J Neurosurg

    (2008)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (31)

  • Complementary Tools in Cerebral Bypass Surgery

    2022, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    While utilizing angiographic dyes has substantial buy-in costs, both dyes are ultimately far less expensive than DSA (i.e., ∼$100 per ICG vial).98 Regarding perioperative anticoagulation and antiplatelet management, reported regimens vary across the cerebral bypass and microsurgical free flap literature—at least partly due to a paucity of quality evidence.99,100 Variable usage patterns reflect an effort to achieve anastomosis patency while avoiding hemorrhagic complications, which have been reported following intraoperative heparinization during bypass.101

  • Imaging Pattern and the Mechanisms of Postoperative Infarction After Indirect Revascularization in Patients with Moyamoya Disease

    2021, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Antiplatelets were reported to decrease microembolic signals37 that might be related to the postoperative infarction caused by artery-to-artery embolization. In other studies, antiplatelets were reported not to increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications during revascularization surgery in MMD.38,39 After this study, we changed our perioperative management to continue antiplatelet therapy during the perioperative period.

  • Risk factors for ischemic complications in vascular reconstructive surgeries

    2020, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Patients taking aspirin, cilostazol, warfarin, clopidogrel, and ethyl icosapentate as antithrombotic agents 3 days prior to the surgery were classified as taking preoperative antithrombotic agents. Usually, antithrombotic therapy was employed in all ischemic disease cases, and aneurysm treatment was used as well, except when there were multiple old ICH scars observed in the T2* MRI or a past history of ICH [10,11]. If patients took the antithrombotic drug before surgery, we continued the same drug because changing the drug itself has risks.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

View full text