Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 34, May 2014, Pages 86-91
Epilepsy & Behavior

Evaluation of health-care utilization in patients with Dravet syndrome and on adjunctive treatment with stiripentol and clobazam

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.03.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Dravet syndrome imposes a substantial economic burden on patients, caregivers and society.

  • Adjunctive stiripentol and clobazam resulted in seizure reduction in two-thirds of patients.

  • Increased AED costs were leveled out by decreased inpatient costs and admissions.

  • Electronic diaries are useful for long-term evaluation of seizure and economic outcome.

Abstract

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, severe childhood epilepsy syndrome that imposes a substantial burden on patients and their caregivers. This study evaluated health-care utilization over a 2-year period in patients with DS at an outpatient clinic of a German epilepsy center. Data on the course of epilepsy, anticonvulsant treatment, and direct costs were recorded using the electronic seizure diary Epivista® and patients' files.

We enrolled 13 patients with DS (6 females, mean age: 12.3 ± 7.5 years) between 2007 and 2010 and evaluated them during a 1-year baseline. All patients had drug-resistant epilepsy and their seizures failed to improve with a mean number of 6.7 ± 3.4 anticonvulsants. They had an overall mean seizure frequency of 102.1 seizures per year (median: 31, range: 3–538) with 43.2 GTCSs per year (median: 14, range: 0–228). We estimated the annual total direct costs at €6506 ± 3974 (range: €1174–11,783) per patient with hospitalization (68.9% of total direct costs) as the major cost factor ahead of costs for anticonvulsants (24.0%). For the 1-year follow-up period, less severely affected patients were continued on conventional anticonvulsants (n = 4) or switched to adjunctive treatment with stiripentol and clobazam (n = 9). In the latter group, six patients (67%) were long-term responders, with between 25% and 100% seizure reduction with respect to either GTCSs or the overall seizure frequency. This reduction in seizure frequency was associated with a shift in the distribution of cost components towards higher medication costs and decreased hospitalization costs. The total direct costs increased by 42.7%, mainly due to the newly introduced stiripentol, with an annual cost of €6610.

This study showed that direct costs of patients with DS were above the average European costs of drug-resistant epilepsy in children. Treatment with new anticonvulsants resulted in reduction of seizures and inpatient admissions.

Introduction

Dravet syndrome (DS) or severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI) is a rare, genetic, severe childhood epilepsy syndrome that imposes a substantial burden on patients and their caregivers.

Disease onset is in the first year of life, with a first peak of symptoms at about 6 months of age, with long-lasting febrile and afebrile hemiclonic or generalized tonic–clonic seizures (GTCSs) and status epilepticus in previously normal children without developmental delay. Between the age of 1 and 4 years, further seizure types including myoclonic, focal, and atypical absence seizures appear. Seizures are usually refractory to conventional anticonvulsants and from the second year of life, affected children develop cognitive, behavior, and motor impairment [1], [2], [3], [4]. The incidence is between 1 in 20,000 and 1 in 40,000 children, and boys are more often affected than girls [2], [4], [5]. The majority of patients have a mutation in the voltage-gated sodium channel type I alpha subunit gene, SCN1A [4], [6].

Anticonvulsant treatment proves to be very difficult, and the children suffer from intractable myoclonus and seizures. There are no specific guidelines for the treatment of DS; so far, valproate, topiramate, bromide, and clobazam have been the most useful drugs [7], [8], [9]. A nonblinded, randomized treatment study comparing bromide, valproate, and phenobarbital was inconclusive due to small patient numbers [10].

A new treatment option for DS is stiripentol, and its efficacy was shown in two small, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in France and Italy [2], [11]. A decrease in seizures of at least 50% was observed in 66.7–71.4% of patients treated with stiripentol as add-on therapy to clobazam and valproate [2], [11]. Stiripentol is authorized in the European Union for use in conjunction with clobazam and valproate as adjunctive therapy of refractory GTCSs in patients with DS whose seizures are not adequately controlled with clobazam and valproate (orphan designation number: EU/3/01/071, European Medicines Agency, www.ema.europa.eu).

Economic evaluations are particularly important in patients with intractable epilepsies as these are associated with high costs [12], [13], [14]. Given the growing resource utilization and limited healthcare resources, it has become essential to gather reliable cost estimates as a scientific basis for resource allocation and health policy decision-making and to monitor the economic consequences of the introduction of new drugs into the market [15], [16].

To date, only few studies have evaluated health-care resource utilization in children and none in defined epileptic syndromes such as DS [14], [15], [16], [17]. Thus, the objectives of this retrospective study were the following: 1.) to determine the utilization of health-care resources in DS over a 1-year baseline period and 2.) to provide direct cost data for a follow-up of 1 year in patients who switched to stiripentol treatment as their seizures were not adequately controlled with clobazam and valproate.

Section snippets

Study setting and design

The study was performed at the Northern German Epilepsy Centre for Children and Adolescents in Raisdorf, Germany. We retrospectively evaluated all patients with DS treated between 2007 and 2010. The clinical diagnosis of DS [18] and classification of seizure types were performed in accordance with the criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy [19], [20]. Inclusion criteria were the following: (1) treatment after the time of implementation of the electronic seizure diary Epivista® at

Patient group

We enrolled 13 patients (6 females) with DS in this evaluation, and their mean age was 12.3 ± 7.5 years (median: 11, range: 3–28). In 11 out of 13 patients (84.6%), a mutation in the SCN1A gene could be confirmed. All patients had drug-resistant epilepsy as they had not achieved sustained seizure freedom on adequate trials of two tolerated and appropriately chosen and used antiepileptic drug schedules [32]. They had failed a mean number of 6.7 ± 3.4 AEDs (median: 6, range: 3–14 failed AEDs). The

Discussion

Although DS is a severe type of childhood epilepsy, seizure reduction can be achieved with different therapeutic strategies, and this is reflected not only by an improvement in quality of life but also by a reduction of costs and prevention of inpatient treatment. This study is the first health economic evaluation to address, specifically, patients with DS, a rare genetic epileptic syndrome, and the influence of adjunctive therapy with stiripentol and clobazam on costs in patients with Dravet

Conclusions

Further studies are warranted to answer questions on the future development of direct cost components with a focus on hospitalization and anticonvulsants. From the societal perspective, major efforts should focus on the reduction of seizures for maintaining quality of care and reducing the need for hospitalization in patients with epilepsy, thus improving the life quality of patients and their caregivers.

This study showed that direct costs of patients with DS were above the average European

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Desitin Arzneimittel GmbH. The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

A. Strzelczyk has received support and honoraria from Bayer HealthCare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Desitin, Eisai, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma.

S. Schubert-Bast has received travel support and honoraria from Desitin, Eisai, and UCB Pharma.

F. Rosenow has received

References (40)

  • B. Kassai et al.

    Severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Epilepsia

    (2008)
  • M. Wolff et al.

    Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infants (Dravet syndrome): natural history and neuropsychological findings

    Epilepsia

    (2006)
  • A. Brunklaus et al.

    Prognostic, clinical and demographic features in SCN1A mutation-positive Dravet syndrome

    Brain

    (2012)
  • D.L. Hurst

    Epidemiology of severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy

    Epilepsia

    (1990)
  • S.M. Zuberi et al.

    Genotype–phenotype associations in SCN1A-related epilepsies

    Neurology

    (2011)
  • C. Chiron et al.

    The pharmacologic treatment of Dravet syndrome

    Epilepsia

    (2011)
  • J. Kroll-Seger et al.

    Topiramate in the treatment of highly refractory patients with Dravet syndrome

    Neuropediatrics

    (2006)
  • U. Stephani et al.

    Treatment of generalized tonic–clonic seizures in the severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy syndrome with potassium bromide — results of a study in 93 children

    Neuropädiatrie Klin Prax

    (2004)
  • R. Guerrini et al.

    The costs of childhood epilepsy in Italy: comparative findings from three health care settings

    Epilepsia

    (2001)
  • A. Argumosa et al.

    Childhood epilepsy: a critical review of cost-of-illness studies

    Epileptic Disord

    (2004)
  • Cited by (47)

    • The clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of Dravet syndrome – A systematic literature review

      2022, Epilepsy and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of the studies identified (n = 103), 94 included estimates on the patterns of timing of clinical events. While several of these were prospective studies (n = 14), most were small cross-sectional studies, had a short follow-up period, or were chart reviews of adults (Supplemental Tables 2 and 3) [2,9–11,17–19,25–30,36–55,57,59–69,71–85,87,94,124,126–185]. The contemporary published data highlight the dramatic clinical impact of DS attributable to seizure- and non-seizure-related manifestations.

    • Long-term treatment with everolimus in TSC-associated therapy-resistant epilepsies

      2021, Seizure
      Citation Excerpt :

      The benefit of EVO was evaluated by comparing seizure frequency per day as well as the number of seizure-free days during the 3-month baseline to the last three months of the different EVO treatment phases. Seizures were documented ongoingly by the parents using the internet-based seizure-diary Epi-Vista® [11–14], a freely available online-documentation platform for seizure frequency and semiology. Epi-Vista® allows a seamless electronic documentation as well as the possibility to export the data for further statistical analysis and supports medical decision making by graphically representing clinical data.

    • Long-term safety and effectiveness of stiripentol in patients with Dravet syndrome: Interim report of a post-marketing surveillance study in Japan

      2021, Epilepsy Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, no significant differences in drug effectiveness were seen between other patient subgroups based on demographic or clinical characteristics. A German study reported a decrease in the frequency of attacks and hospitalizations after treatment with STP (Strzelczyk et al., 2014). In Japan, previous clinical trials have shown a decrease in seizure duration (Inoue et al., 2014, 2015), which may reduce the number of emergency hospitalizations for status epilepticus.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text