Predictors and costs of surgical site infections in patients with endometrial cancer☆,☆☆
Introduction
Standard therapy for endometrial cancer (EC) begins with surgery which is essential for treatment, staging, prognostication, and determination of adjuvant treatments [1], [2], [3]. Surgical intervention carries with it inherent risks, including surgical site infection (SSI). The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was developed to harness risk-adjusted perioperative data directly from patient medical charts to determine postoperative complications that are preventable with the goal of improving the quality of surgical care. NSQIP has defined 3 categories of SSI: superficial incisional, deep incisional, and organ/space [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] (Box 1). SSI is a major contributor to postoperative morbidity and death [9], [10], [11]. In fact, more than one-third of postoperative deaths are related, in part, to SSIs [9] and SSIs increase the cost of care. Among colorectal patients, SSI increases the cost of care more than $6000 per patient [12].
Minimally invasive approaches to abdominal and pelvic cancers have emerged and evolved over the past several decades. Laparoscopic colorectal, gastric, prostate, and hepatobiliary surgery have been shown to have lower rates of SSI and other postoperative complications, as well as shorter hospital stays, than open surgery [8], [10], [13], [14], [15]. Among women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications, minimally invasive approaches decrease the risk of procedure-related complications without increasing the cost of care [16], [17]. Laparoscopic staging for EC results in similar intraoperative complication rates and lower rates of overall postoperative complications compared to open staging [18], [19], [20]. Length of hospital stay is substantially shorter with laparoscopic staging; the ability to identify metastatic disease appears similar with laparoscopy [11], [21], and quality of life is improved among women who undergo minimally invasive EC staging [19], [21]. In addition, laparoscopic staging does not appear to adversely affect survival [22].
Our primary objective was to determine perioperative variables associated with the risk of SSI in EC patients, to identify modifiable variables. A counseling model (preoperative variables only) and a global model (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables) for SSI development were constructed. We also determined the additional 30-day cost to the surgical episode of EC care associated with any SSI and each subtype of SSI that our patients had. Identification of fixed and modifiable variables in the surgical process of care is essential for preoperative patient counseling, risk management, development of preventive strategies, and risk-adjusted reimbursement.
Section snippets
Patient population and data collection
All women who underwent surgical staging for EC between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2008, at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, were eligible for inclusion. In accordance with the Minnesota Statute for Use of Medical Information in Research, women were excluded who did not consent to the use of their medical records for study purposes. To assess the factors influencing the development of SSI within 30 days after surgery, we used the ACS NSQIP platform [23], [24] to systematically
Distribution of SSI types and patient demographic characteristics
In total, 1369 patients met the study inclusion criteria. Of them, 136 (9.9%) had an SSI within 30 days of EC staging surgery. Most SSIs were superficial incisional (89 [65.4%]), followed in frequency by organ/space (31 [22.8%]) and deep incisional (11 [8.1%]). In addition, 5 cases (3.7%) had 2 separate SSI diagnoses. Three patients (2.2%) had both superficial incisional and organ/space SSIs and 2 (1.5%) had both deep incisional and organ/space SSIs. Overall, 1189 patients (86.9%) underwent
Discussion
Advances in the surgical approach to EC have included an improved understanding of the natural history and disease process [1], [2], [30], as well as the introduction of MIS techniques [11], [18], [19], [20], [22]. Although MIS techniques in particular have improved outcomes such as hospital stay and quality of life, the surgical treatment that patients with EC receive is subject to great variability across the country and the world. To improve outcomes, surgeons must focus not only on
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References (49)
- et al.
Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging
Gynecologic Oncology
(2008) - et al.
Surgical stage I endometrial cancer: predictors of distant failure and death
Gynecologic Oncology
(2002) - et al.
Recurrence patterns and surveillance for patients with early stage endometrial cancer
Gynecologic Oncology
(2011) - et al.
Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
(1997) - et al.
Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery: data from national surgical quality improvement program
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
(2010) - et al.
Morbidity and mortality associated with surgical site infections: results from the 1997–1999 INCISO surveillance
Journal of Hospital Infection
(2001) - et al.
Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically?
Adv Surg.
(2009) - et al.
Laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant liver tumors
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int.
(2011) - et al.
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy decreases the incidence and morbidity of surgical site infections
Urology
(2011) - et al.
Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques
Gynecologic Oncology
(2008)
Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial
The Lancet Oncology
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Mayo Clin Proceedings
National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009
American Journal of Infection Control
Prospective protocol for aggressive post-operative glycemia control significantly reduces the rate of surgical site infection in gynecological oncology patients
Gynecologic Oncology
Surgical site infection in patients submitted to digestive surgery: risk prediction and the NNIS risk index
American Journal of Infection Control
Optimal surgical debulking in uterine papillary serous carcinoma affects survival
Gynecologic Oncology
Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer
Gynecologic Oncology
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care
Annals of Surgery
Classic, essential, small-rural, targeted, and Florida variables & definitions
The national surgical quality improvement program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility
Annals of Surgery
Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992–1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy
Obstet Gynecol.
Wound infection after elective colorectal resection
Ann Surg.
Increasing minimally invasive hysterectomy: effect on cost and complications
Obstet Gynecol.
Cited by (75)
Cefazolin as the mainstay for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a penicillin allergy in obstetrics and gynecology
2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyLess is more: Abdominal closure protocol does not reduce surgical site infection after hysterectomy
2022, Gynecologic OncologyInfection and obesity: Two sides of the same coin
2022, Viral, Parasitic, Bacterial, and Fungal Infections: Antimicrobial, Host Defense, and Therapeutic Strategies
- ☆
Presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Surgeons, San Francisco, California, October 23–27, 2011.
- ☆☆
Funding source: This work was partially supported by the Office of Women's Health Research Building Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH award K12 HD065987).