Review
PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer: Current status and future promise

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.039Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are one of the most exciting new classes of targeted agents for ovarian cancer treatment.

  • PARP inhibitors have demonstrated single-agent activity in BRCA-related ovarian cancer and sporadic high grade serous ovarian cancer.

  • Phase III PARP inhibitor studies have been launched for newly diagnosed germline BRCA cancers and platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.

Abstract

Clinical investigation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for ovarian cancer treatment has rapidly evolved from observations of single-agent in vitro activity of these agents in BRCA-deficient cancer cells in 2005 to the initiation of multiple phase III studies in 2013. With clinical trial design and treatment of ovarian cancer increasingly based on histological and molecular characteristics, PARP inhibitors are on the horizon of becoming the first biologic agents to be used to treat ovarian cancer based upon pre-selection characteristics of the patient's cancer. PARP inhibitors are most active in ovarian cancers that have defects or aberrations in DNA repair; use of these agents has been of particular interest in high grade serous cancers (HGSC), where studies have shown that ~ 50% of HGSC have abnormalities of DNA repair through BRCA germline and somatic mutation, post-translational changes of BRCA, and abnormalities of other DNA repair molecules. In addition, as aberrant DNA pathways in other histological subtypes of ovarian cancer are identified, and through the combination of PARP inhibitors with other biologic agents, the pool of eligible patients who may benefit from PARP inhibitors will likely expand. Pending review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the outcome of confirmatory phase III studies, PARP inhibitors could become the first FDA-approved biologic agent for ovarian cancer and also the first new FDA-approval in ovarian cancer since carboplatin and gemcitabine were approved for platinum sensitive ovarian cancer in 2006. This review discusses the PARP inhibitors that are currently in testing for ovarian cancer treatment and the future of this class of anti-cancer agents.

Introduction

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are one of the most exciting new classes of targeted agents currently in clinical trials for ovarian cancer [1], [2]. From the original in vitro observation that PARP inhibitor have anti-cancer activity in BRCA-deficient cells to the demonstration that these agents have single-agent anti-cancer activity in BRCA-related recurrent ovarian cancer, these agents are poised to ultimately change how patients with BRCA-related ovarian cancer are treated [3], [4], [5]. The PARP inhibitor field was initially slowed with the publication of a negative Phase III study testing iniparib combined with carboplatin and gemcitabine for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer; however, the field has been accelerated by the results of studies of several PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer demonstrating anti-cancer activity in addition to the in vitro observation that iniparib does not have anti-PARP activity at physiological doses. In addition, PARP inhibitors appear to be well tolerated as well and have mostly myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity. Several phase III FDA registration studies of PARP inhibitors have been initiated in both recurrent and newly diagnosed ovarian cancer that focus on using PARP inhibitors as single-agent maintenance therapy following chemotherapy; overlapping myelosuppressive effects of PARP inhibitor with chemotherapy and demonstration of single-agent activity of PARP inhibitor have led to this strategy. This FDA registration trial design is based on the findings of a randomized phase II study that tested the PARP inhibitor olaparib versus placebo maintenance in women with recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer [6]. This study specifically focused on women with HGSC, a subtype of ovarian cancer where DNA repair abnormalities are estimated to be present in approximately 50% of cases [7]. In this study, women receiving olaparib had a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared to those receiving placebo; this improvement was even more pronounced in women who harbored a BRCA mutation [8]. In this review, we will discuss the clinical development of the current PARP inhibitors, as well as future challenges for this exciting drug class.

Section snippets

Mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors

The PARP family consists of a large number of putative members, of which PARP-1 and PARP-2 [2], [9] have been characterized to have a role in DNA repair. Inhibition of the PARP enzyme leads to persistence of spontaneously occurring single-strand breaks (SSBs) and subsequent formation of double-strand breaks (DSBs) as the SSBs stall and collapse replication forks, leading to DSBs. These DSBs cannot be repaired by the defective homologous recombination (HR) pathway in BRCA-mutated cells thereby

Ovarian cancer subtypes that are appropriate targets for PARP inhibitors

PARP inhibitors originally were found to have anti-cancer activity both in vitro and in vivo in germline BRCA mutated cancer [3], [4], [5], [15]. In addition, PARP inhibitors were also observed to have anti-cancer activity in HGSC in patients without a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, likely due to the previously mentioned DNA repair defects present in about half of HGSC [16]. To date, eligibility for phase III studies of PARP inhibitors has included patients with known germline BRCA mutations

Specific agents and clinical trials

Table 1 lists the PARP inhibitors that have been tested or are currently in testing in ovarian cancer patients as part of a phase I, II or III study. These agents include olaparib (AZD2281) which was the first PARP inhibitor tested in ovarian cancer patients, veliparib (ABT-888), niraparib (MK4827), rucaparib (CO338, AG014699, and PF01367338), and BMN 673. The agent iniparib is no longer considered a PARP inhibitor [19], [20]. Table 2, Table 3 list randomized phase II and III studies of PARP

Combination strategies with biologic agents

Because of the potential synergy of PARP inhibitors with inhibitors of other signaling pathways, combinations of PARP inhibitors with other targeted biologic agents are underway in clinical trials, including trials combining PARP inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents as well as with PI3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors. Pre-clinical rationale exists for combining anti-angiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors including HR can be suppressed by hypoxia through down regulation of HR repair proteins and that

Challenges for development of PARP inhibitors in ovarian cancer

Although PARP inhibitors have shown striking responses in germline BRCA-associated tumors, there are still several challenges for the clinical development of these agents. First, identification of sporadic patients who harbor HR-deficient tumors without BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and who may respond to PARP inhibitors is an important challenge. Unfortunately, there is currently no prospectively validated biomarker of HR-deficient ovarian cancers that accurately predicts defective HR and

Conclusions and future strategies

PARP inhibitors are among the most exciting active and overall well tolerated new agents currently in clinical testing for ovarian cancer. Several phase III studies are underway that are testing various PARP inhibitors as single-agent maintenance therapy following platinum based chemotherapy for newly diagnosed germline BRCA ovarian cancer patients and in patients with recurrent platinum sensitive germline BRCA as well as sporadic high grade ovarian cancer. PARP inhibitors are poised to change

Conflict of interest statement

Joyce Liu and Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos have no financial conflicts. Ursula Matulonis has served on advisory boards for Clovis Pharmaceuticals and Tesaro. Ursula Matulonis is the overall Principal Investigator (PI) of the Stand Up to Cancer-funded study NCT01623349 (Phase I of olaparib and BKM120 for the treatment of recurrent HGSC of the ovary or triple negative breast cancer). Joyce Liu is the PI of the National Cancer Institute-funded study NCT01116648 (Phase I and randomized phase II

References (64)

  • H.E. Bryant et al.

    Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase

    Nature

    (2005)
  • H. Farmer et al.

    Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy

    Nature

    (2005)
  • P.C. Fong et al.

    Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA-carriers

    N Engl J Med

    (2009)
  • J.A. Ledermann et al.

    Olaparib maintenance therapy in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian cancer

    Nature

    (2011)
  • J.A. Ledermann et al.

    Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation

    Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • M. Rouleau et al.

    PARP inhibition: PARP1 and beyond

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2010)
  • Patel Ag et al.

    Nonhomologous end joining drives poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor lethality in homologous recombination-deficient cells

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2011)
  • J. Murai et al.

    Trapping of PARP1 and PARP2 by clinical PARP inhibitors

    Cancer Res

    (2012)
  • K. Alsop et al.

    BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • T. Pal et al.

    BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases

    Cancer

    (2005)
  • B.T. Hennessy et al.

    Somatic mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could expand the number of patients that benefit from poly (ADP ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • K.P. Pennington et al.

    Germline and somatic mutations in homologous recombination genes predict platinum response and survival in ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal carcinomas

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2014)
  • J. Mateo et al.

    Appraising iniparib, the PARP inhibitor that never was-what must we learn?

    Nat Rev Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • A.G. Patel et al.

    Failure of iniparib to inhibit poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase in vitro

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2012)
  • S.B. Kaye et al.

    Phase II, open-label, randomized, multicenter study comparing the efficacy and safety of olaparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and recurrent ovarian cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • P.C. Fong et al.

    Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition: frequent durable responses in BRCA carrier ovarian cancer correlating with platinum-free interval

    J Clin Oncol

    (2010)
  • B. Norquist et al.

    Secondary somatic mutations restoring BRCA1/2 predict chemotherapy resistance in hereditary ovarian carcinomas

    J Clin Oncol

    (2011)
  • C.J. Lord et al.

    Mechanisms of resistance to therapies targeting BRCA-mutant cancers

    Nat Med

    (2013)
  • J.E. Ang et al.

    Efficacy of chemotherapy in BRCA1/2 mutation carrier ovarian cancer in the setting of PARP inhibitor resistance: a multi-institutional study

    Clin Cancer Res

    (2013)
  • T. Safra et al.

    BRCA mutation status and determinant of outcome in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer treated with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin

    Mol Cancer Ther

    (2011)
  • J. Balmana et al.

    Phase I, open-label study of olaparib plus cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

    J Clin Oncol

    (2012)
  • Cited by (120)

    • Basic principles of chemotherapy and other systemic therapies

      2023, DiSaia and Creasman Clinical Gynecologic Oncology
    • C. elegans as a model organism to study female reproductive health

      2022, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology -Part A : Molecular and Integrative Physiology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text