Elsevier

Gynecologic Oncology

Volume 158, Issue 3, September 2020, Pages 702-709
Gynecologic Oncology

Menopausal hormone therapy prior to the diagnosis of ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.481Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Using menopausal hormone therapy prior to diagnosis extends ovarian cancer survival.

  • Estrogen alone and estrogen+progestin are associated with better survival.

  • Women who used hormone therapy have less residual disease after surgery.

Abstract

Purpose

Prior studies of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and ovarian cancer survival have been limited by lack of hormone regimen detail and insufficient sample sizes. To address these limitations, a comprehensive analysis of 6419 post-menopausal women with pathologically confirmed ovarian carcinoma was conducted to examine the association between MHT use prior to diagnosis and survival.

Methods

Data from 15 studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium were included. MHT use was examined by type (estrogen-only (ET) or estrogen+progestin (EPT)), duration, and recency of use relative to diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between hormone therapy use and survival. Logistic regression and mediation analysis was used to explore the relationship between MHT use and residual disease following debulking surgery.

Results

Use of ET or EPT for at least five years prior to diagnosis was associated with better ovarian cancer survival (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.87). Among women with advanced stage, high-grade serous carcinoma, those who used MHT were less likely to have any macroscopic residual disease at the time of primary debulking surgery (p for trend <0.01 for duration of MHT use). Residual disease mediated some (17%) of the relationship between MHT and survival.

Conclusions

Pre-diagnosis MHT use for 5+ years was a favorable prognostic factor for women with ovarian cancer. This large study is consistent with prior smaller studies, and further work is needed to understand the underlying mechanism.

Introduction

Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers including ovarian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer (hereafter referred to as ovarian cancer) collectively account for more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system in the United States, with a five-year survival rate of less than 50% [1]. There is clear evidence that menopausal estrogen-alone hormone therapy (ET) is associated with an increased risk of developing ovarian cancer [[2], [3], [4]], but the relationship between menopausal estrogen plus progestin therapy (EPT) and risk of ovarian cancer is less clear [3]. Further, the relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use and survival may not be the same as the relationship with risk.

Pre-diagnosis MHT use and ovarian cancer survival has been examined in nine population-based studies [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. Most observed a modestly inverse association, with hazard ratios ranging from 0.23 [11] to 1.1 [12] (Table S1), but protection was statistically significant in only one study (MHT use >5 years: HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.90) [5]. These studies were subject to one or more of the following important limitations: they (1) lacked information about duration of use; (2) did not distinguish between types of MHT use before diagnosis (i.e., ET and/or EPT); (3) had follow-up times of only a few years; (4) had an insufficient sample size to stratify by ovarian cancer histotype; and (5) lacked information about residual disease after debulking surgery. Many women use MHT for only a short period of time, thus missing duration information is an important weakness that may have masked effects in prior studies [14]. Rigorously evaluating the association between pre-diagnosis MHT use and ovarian cancer survival by hormone type, duration, survival time, residual disease and cancer histotype is essential to advance our understanding of disease prognosis.

In the present analysis from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), we followed 6419 women with ovarian cancer for up to 26 years and investigated the association between pre-diagnosis MHT use and survival. We investigated duration, type and timing of MHT use in each of the main histological subtypes. A particularly important prognostic factor in ovarian cancer survival is residual disease after initial debulking surgery. Therefore, we also considered the potential relationship of MHT use with residual disease after surgery.

Section snippets

Methods

Institutional Review Board or comparable ethics approval was received by each study and informed consent was provided by all women.

Results

The analytic sample included 6419 post-menopausal women from 15 sites in the OCAC (Fig. S1; Table S2). A majority of the women had HGSC (68.4%) and most had advanced stage disease at diagnosis (67.7%, Table 1). Exclusive EPT use (18.5%) was more common than exclusive ET use (14.2%). Most women (58.9%) did not use either type and 212 (3.3%) used both ET and EPT (Table 1).

The median survival time was 5.4 years after diagnosis. ET and EPT use for at least five years were both associated with

Discussion

In this study, pre-diagnosis MHT use for at least five years was associated with better ovarian cancer survival, regardless of MHT type (ET or EPT) and recency of use relative to diagnosis. Other studies reported ever use of MHT to be associated with improved survival (Table S1), but this is the first study to report on the effect of duration and recency of MHT use, type of MHT use, histotype, and residual disease after debulking surgery on survival outcomes.

Women with advanced HGSC who had

Funding

OCAC funding: The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium is supported by a grant from the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund thanks to donations by the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith (PPD/RPCI.07).

Funding for individual studies: AUS: The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study (AOCS) was supported by the U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command (DAMD17-01-1-0729), National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia (199600, 400413 and 400281), Cancer Councils of New South Wales,

Declaration of Competing Interest

Usha Menon has stocks in Abcodia awarded to her by University College London.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the family and friends of Kathryn Sladek Smith for their generous support of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium through their donations to the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund. We thank the study participants, doctors, nurses, clinical and scientific collaborators, health care providers and health information sources who have contributed to the many studies contributing to this manuscript.

Acknowledgements for individual studies: AUS: The AOCS also acknowledges the

References (40)

  • L. Power et al.

    Hormone use after nonserous epithelial ovarian cancer: overall and disease-free survival

    Obstet. Gynecol.

    (2016)
  • S.J. Kim et al.

    Epidemiologic factors that predict long-term survival following a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer

    Br. J. Cancer

    (2017)
  • C. Mascarenhas et al.

    Use of hormone replacement therapy before and after ovarian cancer diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival

    Int. J. Cancer

    (2006)
  • C.M. Nagle et al.

    The influence of reproductive and hormonal factors on ovarian cancer survival

    Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer

    (2008)
  • M. Zhang et al.

    Tubal ligation and survival of ovarian cancer patients

    J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.

    (2012)
  • K.J. Wernli et al.

    Hormone therapy and ovarian cancer: incidence and survival

    Cancer Causes Control

    (2008)
  • J. Besevic et al.

    Reproductive factors and epithelial ovarian cancer survival in the EPIC cohort study

    Br. J. Cancer

    (2015)
  • J.B. Madalinska et al.

    The impact of hormone replacement therapy on menopausal symptoms in younger high-risk women after prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2006)
  • World Health Organization

    BMI Classification, Global Database on Body Mass Index

    (2006)
  • N. Bhatla et al.

    FIGO cancer report 2018

    Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.

    (2018)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Lifestyle and personal factors associated with having macroscopic residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreductive surgery

      2023, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This is unlikely due to access to care, since the majority of our patients were diagnosed at stage IIIC or IV (85.7%; Table 2). We have previously hypothesized that exposure to estrogen makes the tumor less adhesive to their neighbor tissues and thus easier to resect [10]. Estrogen promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process, through which the tumor detaches from nearby tissues.

    • Ovarian cancer survival by stage, histotype, and pre-diagnostic lifestyle factors, in the prospective UK Million Women Study

      2022, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      We did not find that these associations varied by tumour histological type, but this might be due to insufficient statistical power. Several other studies have suggested that menopausal hormone use may be associated with improved ovarian cancer survival [36–39], but we found no such association, nor did the NIH-AARP study [40]. We found little or no evidence of an association between ovarian cancer survival and other reproductive or hormonal factors, broadly in keeping with previous reports [37].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text