Enzyme augmentation therapy enhances the therapeutic efficacy of bone marrow transplantation in mucopolysaccharidosis type II mice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2013.09.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • All of the studies were conducted using murine model of mucopolysaccaridosis type II (MPS II).

  • BMT reduced the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in a variety of visceral organs, but not in the CNS.

  • The combination of BMT and ERT was additive at reducing tissue levels of GAGs in the heart, kidney and lung.

  • ERT conferred greater efficacy if the immunological response against the infused recombinant enzyme was low.

  • Pathologic GAGs might represent a sensitive biomarker to monitor the therapeutic efficacy of therapies for MPS II.

Abstract

Before the availability of an enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), patients were treated by bone marrow transplantation (BMT). However, the effectiveness of BMT for MPS II was equivocal, particularly at addressing the CNS manifestations. To study this further, we subjected a murine model of MPS II to BMT and evaluated the effect at correcting the biochemical and pathological aberrations in the viscera and CNS. Our results indicated that BMT reduced the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in a variety of visceral organs, but not in the CNS. With the availability of an approved ERT for MPS II, we investigated and compared the relative merits of the two strategies either as a mono or combination therapy. We showed that the combination of BMT and ERT was additive at reducing tissue levels of GAGs in the heart, kidney and lung. Moreover, ERT conferred greater efficacy if the immunological response against the infused recombinant enzyme was low. Finally, we showed that pathologic GAGs might potentially represent a sensitive biomarker to monitor the therapeutic efficacy of therapies for MPS II.

Introduction

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) caused by a deficiency in the activity of the lysosomal enzyme, iduronate-2-sulfate (IDS, EC 3.1.6.13), which degrades the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate [1]. The widespread and progressive lysosomal accumulation of undegraded GAGs leads to a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations. These include skeletal deformities, cardiac valvular disease, cardiac hypertrophy, hepatosplenomegaly, coarse facial appearance, upper airway narrowing, hearing defect, enlarged tongue, retinopathy and CNS involvement [2]. These clinical symptoms significantly compromise the patients' quality of life.

Presently, two therapies are available to treat MPS II; one is enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and the other is bone marrow transplantation (BMT). ERT has been shown to be effective at correcting aspects of the visceral disease [3], [4], [5] but not the CNS lesion as the enzyme dose not cross the blood–brain barrier [6], [7]. ERT also has a limited impact on the bone and valvular lesions [8]. In addition, the need for repeated infusions of the enzyme is costly and confers a heavy burden on the MPS II patients [9].

BMT has been shown to be effective at treating several neuropathic LSDs such as MPS I, MPS VI, globoid-cell leukodystrophy, metachromatic leukodystrophy, Gaucher disease and others [10], [11]. In contrast to ERT, BMT might address the CNS lesions associated with several LSDs by virtue of the migration of enzyme competent donor cells into the brain. Consequent secretion of the enzyme from these cells may allow for cross-correction of patients' enzyme deficient neuronal cells. Early studies suggested that BMT should not be indicated for MPS II patients due to disappointing outcomes, particularly the limited impact on CNS involvement [12], [13], [14], [15]. However, recent report demonstrated the long-term efficacy of BMT in CNS involvement of an MPS II patient [16]. Thus, it is not evident if BMT should be indicated for MPS II. Moreover, there have been no animal studies showing the impact of BMT at reducing the level of GAGs in the brain.

Prior to the availability of ERT, some patients were treated by BMT with the hope of improving the visceral disease and CNS disease. Now that an approved enzyme is available for these patients, we asked if ERT could enhance the therapeutic effect of BMT. This has not been demonstrated for either human or murine MPS II. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of BMT at addressing CNS disease, as well as the relative merits of the combination of BMT and ERT in a mouse model of MPS II.

Section snippets

Animal husbandry

Female mice heterozygous for the X-linked allele (IDS+/−) on a congenic C57BL/6 background were kindly provided from Joseph Muenzer (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) [17]. The carrier females were bred with male wild type (WT) mice of the same genetic background strain, producing hemizygous IDS knock-out males (MPS II mouse model, IdS−/0). The genotypes of all offspring were determined by polymerase chain reaction analysis of DNA obtained from a tail snip. B6.SJL-ptprca mice congenic

Engraftment of donor cells in mice treated with BMT and a combination of BMT and ERT

Donor cell engraftment in mice subjected to BMT and BMT + ERT was analyzed at 12 weeks and 27 weeks following BMT (Table 1). Approximately 90% donor cell engraftment in each lineage cell was achieved at 12 and 27 weeks in animals that received BMT alone or in combination with ERT. Percent engraftment of T cell lineage was lower than for other cell lineages probably because of the longer half life time of pre-existing recipient T cells.

Serum IDS activity in mice treated with BMT, ERT or a combination of BMT and ERT

Serum IDS activities at various time points were assayed

Discussion

In early 1980s, first report described the effectiveness of BMT for MPS I [23]. Subsequently, BMT was performed in many MPS I patients with encouraging results [24]. BMT was particularly effective at addressing the CNS involvement of MPS I patients when BMT was performed in patients who were < 2 years old and had an IQ ≥ 70. Animal studies also demonstrated a reduction of GAGs in brain following BMT [25]. In contrast to MPS I, there is huge controversy for indicating BMT for MPS II patients [10],

Conflict of interest

T. Ohashi, H. Ida and Y. Eto have active research support from Genzyme Japan Co., Ltd. and Shire Japan Co., Ltd. These activities have been fully disclosed and are managed under a Memorandum of Understanding with the Conflict of Interest Resolution Board of The Jikei University School of Medicine.

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank Joseph Muenzer at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for providing us the MPS II mice, Hideto Morimoto at JCR Pharmaceuticals Company Limited for providing us antibody against human IDS and Genzyme Japan Co., Ltd. for providing us Idursulfase. We also thank Seng Cheng at Genzyme Corporation for critically reviewing our manuscript, Taku Sato at Tokyo Medical and Dental University for helping us flow cytometry study and Sayoko Iizuka and Eiko Kaneshiro at The Jikei

References (38)

Cited by (16)

  • Hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy ameliorates CNS involvement in murine model of GM1-gangliosidosis

    2022, Molecular Therapy Methods and Clinical Development
    Citation Excerpt :

    βgal activity was assayed in cells and medium. For the mice study, the infected cells were washed with PBS after 24 h and 2.0 × 106 cells were injected intravenously into βgal−/− recipient mice (8 weeks old) after lethal total body irradiation of 9 Gy using a Hitachi-MBR1520-R irradiator (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), according to a procedure previously described.46 For secondary bone marrow transplant, whole bone marrow cells were harvested from the tibias and femurs of first transplanted βgal−/− recipient mice (36 weeks old) and injected intravenously into βgal−/− recipient mice (8 weeks old) after lethal irradiation of 9 Gy, as described earlier.

  • Ex Vivo Gene Therapy Treats Bone Complications of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II Mouse Models through Bone Remodeling Reactivation

    2020, Molecular Therapy Methods and Clinical Development
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, HSCT is not sufficiently effective in the CNS lesions of MPS II patients, resulting in negative reviews in the US and Europe.14–17 We have also demonstrated that ERT and HSCT are ineffective in MPS II CNS and bone lesions.18 In recent years, clinical trials of HSC gene therapy using lentiviral vectors have proven effective in adrenoleukodystrophy, metachromatic leukodystrophy, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and β-thalassemia.19–22.

  • Efficient engraftment of genetically modified cells is necessary to ameliorate central nervous system involvement of murine model of mucopolysaccharidosis type II by hematopoietic stem cell targeted gene therapy

    2020, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
    Citation Excerpt :

    The therapeutic mechanism involves cross correction by brain migrated donor cells that secrete the normal enzyme and effectively correct its deficiency in the surrounding tissues [7]. HSCT has shown therapeutic benefits for peripheral tissues, but its CNS impact in cases with MPS II remains unclear [5,8–11]. Other therapies have been investigated in animal models and human patients to improve the CNS involvement in patients with MPS II [5].

  • Non-myeloablative preconditioning with ACK2 (anti-c-kit antibody) is efficient in bone marrow transplantation for murine models of mucopolysaccharidosis type II

    2016, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
    Citation Excerpt :

    Early studies suggested that HSCT had very limited effects for brain involvement of MPS II patients [15–18]. Supporting this conclusion, we showed that HSCT for murine models of MPS II did reduce accumulated GAGs in visceral organs, but not in brain [19]. On the contrary, a recent report demonstrated the long-term effect of HSCT for brain involvement of MPS II patients [20], if it was performed in the very early stage of the disease.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text