Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 16, Issue 12, December 2017, Pages 987-1048
The Lancet Neurology

The Lancet Neurology Commission
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-XGet rights and content

Section snippets

Executive summary

A concerted effort to tackle the global health problem posed by traumatic brain injury (TBI) is long overdue. TBI is a public health challenge of vast, but insufficiently recognised, proportions. Worldwide, more than 50 million people have a TBI each year, and it is estimated that about half the world's population will have one or more TBIs over their lifetime. TBI is the leading cause of mortality in young adults and a major cause of death and disability across all ages in all countries, with

Section 1: Epidemiology of TBI

Globally, TBI is a leading cause of injury-related death and disability,8, 30, 31 imposing a huge burden on patients, their families, and society. In LMICs, the rising burden of TBI from increases in road traffic incidents predominantly affects young individuals.7 The changing epidemiology of TBI in HICs is attributable to a high and increasing incidence in paediatric and elderly subpopulations.4, 5, 6, 32, 33, 34 Increases in TBI are also reported in the contexts of sports35, 36, 37 and armed

Section 2: Health economics of TBI

TBI has a huge economic impact on affected individuals and families, and on society as a whole. Understanding the health economics of TBI is an important step in efforts to improve efficiency of care and prevention worldwide. However, accurate estimates of TBI costs are scarce for many regions, and there is wide variation in reported costs between available studies. This partly reflects differences in methods used to calculate costs and variations in definitions of direct, indirect, and

Section 3: Prevention of TBI

TBI is, to a great extent, preventable, and the benefits for society of decreasing its occurrence are far-reaching: TBI prevention saves lives, reduces prevalence of disabilities, and saves costs inside and outside the health-care system. Although TBI prevention strategies (such as those aimed at road traffic safety) in some regions have been remarkably successful, these achievements are not universal. Increased use of motor vehicles in LMICs, coupled with an inadequate infrastructure and

Section 4: Systems of care for TBI

In an ideal world, all patients would have access to optimum care for TBI, meeting standards of best practice, with continuity of care guaranteed from the prehospital phase to the postacute phase. In reality, systems of care for patients with TBI show substantial variation between and within countries,231, 232, 233, 234 with disconnects in the trauma chain, particularly between acute and postacute care. Understanding such variation is crucial: practice variations influence TBI outcomes and

Section 5: Clinical management of TBI

Management of TBI is currently based on a combination of medical and surgical strategies, and, ideally, rehabilitation to promote recovery and social reintegration and to address the longer-term complications of TBI. However, many RCTs of interventions for TBI have not shown beneficial effects, or have produced results that cannot be generalised to the wider population of patients with TBI. Therefore, when guidelines are available, they are often based on weak evidence, supplemented by expert

Section 6: Characterisation of TBI—the path to precision medicine

Detailed characterisation of initial injury severity and type is needed to stratify patients with TBI for optimum clinical management. Conventionally, the initial severity of TBI has been classified as mild, moderate, or severe on the basis of assessment of the level of consciousness, measured with the GCS (figure 2).42 However, this unidimensional classification ignores the mechanistic heterogeneity of TBI. Pathoanatomical insights into the nature of TBI have come from neuropathology studies,

Section 7: Assessment of TBI outcome—towards multidimensional approaches

While improved characterisation of initial injury severity and type is a prerequisite for the development of precision-medicine approaches to TBI (section 6), more refined assessment of clinical outcome is equally essential to measure the effectiveness of early treatments and guide individualised management in the postacute phase. Accurate characterisation of outcome is also necessary to evaluate patterns of recovery and deterioration in the long term, to predict long-term care needs for

Section 8: Prognosis in TBI—linking patient and injury characteristics to outcome

Outcome after TBI depends not only on the quality of care provided, but also on patient and injury characteristics such as premorbid state (eg, age or comorbidities), mechanism of trauma, injury severity, presence and severity of extracranial injuries, patient response, and social environment. Linking patient and injury characteristics at presentation to outcome is the science of prognosis and prognostic modelling.461 Prognostic models combine a range of characteristics in a mathematical

Section 9: New directions for acquiring and implementing evidence

The heterogeneity of the population at risk of TBI, variations in injury patterns, and wide disparities in systems of care pose particular challenges for the generation and implementation of clinical evidence in the field of TBI. Evidence underpinning guidelines for trauma care pathways and clinical interventions is often weak, and recommendations are inconsistently implemented (sections 4, 5). Conventional approaches to reduce heterogeneity in RCTs of medical or surgical interventions have

Conclusions

TBI is likely to remain the largest global contributor to neurological disability until the end of the next decade, with a predicted burden of disability that far exceeds that of conditions such as cerebrovascular disease and dementia.8 Crucially, TBI-associated disability often affects young people at their productive peak, and results in huge burdens to individuals, families, and society (section 1). Extrapolation from available estimates suggests a global annual cost of TBI as high as US$400

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (557)

  • M Majdan et al.

    Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis based on hospital discharge statistics and death certificates in 2012

    Lancet Public Health

    (2016)
  • G Teasdale et al.

    Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale

    Lancet

    (1974)
  • B Gabella et al.

    Urban and rural traumatic brain injuries in Colorado

    Ann Epidemiol

    (1997)
  • V Nell et al.

    Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Johannesburg—II. Morbidity, mortality and etiology

    Soc Sci Med

    (1991)
  • VG Coronado et al.

    Trends in traumatic brain injury in the U.S. and the public health response: 1995–2009

    J Safety Res

    (2012)
  • J-Y Jiang

    Head trauma in China

    Injury

    (2013)
  • J-Y Jiang et al.

    Violent head trauma in China: report of 2254 cases

    Surg Neurol

    (2007)
  • A Burton

    A key traumatic brain injury initiative in India

    Lancet Neurol

    (2016)
  • D Gupta et al.

    Guideline adherence and outcomes in severe adult traumatic brain injury for the CHIRAG (Collaborative Head Injury and Guidelines) study

    World Neurosurg

    (2016)
  • T Ventura et al.

    Mortality after discharge from acute care hospitalization with traumatic brain injury: a population-based study

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2010)
  • A Brazinova et al.

    Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe: a living systematic review

    J Neurotrauma

    (2016)
  • S Kleiven et al.

    The epidemiology of head injuries in Sweden from 1987 to 2000

    Inj Control Saf Promot

    (2003)
  • S Koskinen et al.

    Traumatic brain injury in Finland 1991–2005: a nationwide register study of hospitalized and fatal TBI

    Brain Inj

    (2008)
  • Neurological disorders: public health challenges

  • World Development Indicators database

  • S Sener et al.

    Diffusion tensor imaging: a possible biomarker in severe traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?

    Neurosurgery

    (2016)
  • S Fleminger et al.

    Head injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: the evidence 10 years on; a partial replication

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • W Li et al.

    Traumatic brain injury and age at onset of cognitive impairment in older adults

    J Neurol

    (2016)
  • JF Burke et al.

    Traumatic brain injury may be an independent risk factor for stroke

    Neurology

    (2013)
  • S Jafari et al.

    Head injury and risk of Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Mov Disord

    (2013)
  • RC Gardner et al.

    Traumatic brain injury in later life increases risk for Parkinson disease

    Ann Neurol

    (2015)
  • PK Crane et al.

    Association of traumatic brain injury with late-life neurodegenerative conditions and neuropathologic findings

    JAMA Neurol

    (2016)
  • TM McMillan et al.

    Death after head injury: the 13 year outcome of a case control study

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2011)
  • N Stocchetti et al.

    Chronic impact of traumatic brain injury on outcome and quality of life: a narrative review

    Crit Care

    (2016)
  • J Hay et al.

    Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: the neuropathological legacy of traumatic brain injury

    Annu Rev Pathol

    (2016)
  • RA Stern et al.

    Clinical presentation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy

    Neurology

    (2013)
  • KM Guskiewicz et al.

    Association between recurrent concussion and late-life cognitive impairment in retired professional football players

    Neurosurgery

    (2005)
  • J Mez et al.

    Clinicopathological evaluation of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in players of American football

    JAMA

    (2017)
  • B Te Ao et al.

    Cost of traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: evidence from a population-based study

    Neurology

    (2014)
  • M Faul et al.

    Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006

    (2010)
  • Report to Congress on traumatic brain injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation

  • W Peeters et al.

    Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (2015)
  • Rates of TBI-related emergency department visits by age group—United States, 2001–2010

  • Nonfatal traumatic brain injuries related to sports and recreation activities among persons aged ≤19 years. United States, 2001–2009

  • JM Hootman et al.

    Epidemiology of collegiate injuries for 15 sports: summary and recommendations for injury prevention initiatives

    J Athl Train

    (2007)
  • AE Lincoln et al.

    Trends in concussion incidence in high school sports: a prospective 11-year study

    Am J Sports Med

    (2011)
  • JE Risdall et al.

    Traumatic brain injury

    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci

    (2011)
  • LJ Carroll et al.

    Methodological issues and research recommendations for mild traumatic brain injury

    J Rehabil Med

    (2004)
  • Definition of mild traumatic brain injury

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1993)
  • RM Ruff et al.

    Recommendations for diagnosing a mild traumatic brain injury: a National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper

    Arch Clin Neuropsychol

    (2009)
  • Cited by (1544)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Contributed equally

    Author affiliations listed at the end of the paper

    InTBIR Participants and Investigators listed at the end of the paper

    View full text