Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T23:58:22.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

23 - Interaction Process Analysis (IPA)

from General Group Process Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Bales, R. F. (1950b). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Allen, W. R., Comerford, R. A., & Ruhe, J. A. (1989). Factor analytic study of Bales’ Interaction Process Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49, 701707. doi:10.1177/001316448904900325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. F. (1950a). A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction. American Sociological Review, 15, 257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. F., & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bales, R. F., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 485495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, D., & Fisch, R. (2000). Argumentation and emotional processes in group decision-making: Illustration of a multilevel interaction process analysis approach. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 183201. doi:10.1177/1368430200003002005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., & Keyton, J. (2009). Perceiving strategic meeting interaction. Small Group Research, 40, 223246. doi:10.1177/1046496408330084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., & Keyton, J. (2012). Team cognition, communication, and message interdependence. In Salas, E., Fiore, S. F., & Letsky, M. (Eds.), Theories of team cognition: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 471494). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beck, S. J., & Keyton, J. (2014). Facilitating social support: Member-leader communication in a breast cancer support group. Cancer Nursing, 37, E3643. doi:10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182813829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S. J., Paskewitz, E. A., Anderson, W. A., Bourdeaux, , & Currie-Mueller, J. (2017). The task and relational dimensions of online social support. Health Communication, 32, 347355. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1138383CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, K. S., Im, I., & Hofstede, G. J. (2016). A cross-cultural comparative analysis of small group collaboration using mobile twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 308318. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, M. R., Kunkel, A., & Keyton, J. (2008). Problematic integration theory, appraisal theory, and the Bosom Buddies Breast Cancer Support Group. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 415436. doi:10.1080/00909880802094315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, J., Bonito, J., & Keyton, J. (2017). Convergence of intrapersonal and interpersonal processes across group meetings. Communication Monographs, 84, 200220. doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1185136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahy, , P. (2005). Online and face-to-face group interaction processes compared using Bales’ Interaction Process Analysis (IPA). Retrieved February 14, 2018, from www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Patrick_J_Fahy.htmGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision‐making. Speech Monographs, 7, 5366. doi:10.1080/03637757009375649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H., & Goh, D.H-L. (2014). ‘‘I Have AIDS”: Content analysis of postings in HIV/AIDS support group on a Chinese microblog, 34, 219226. Retrieved February 14, 2018, from www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Patrick_J_Fahyhtm.Google Scholar
Hackman, J. R. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 4599. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60248-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225252 doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00104.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 39103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyton, J. (1997). Coding communication in decision-making groups: Assessing effective and ineffective process. In Frey, L. R. & Barge, J. K. (Eds.), Managing group life: Communication in decision-making groups (pp. 236269). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Keyton, J. (2003). Observing group interaction. In Hirokawa, R. Y., Cathcart, R. S., Samovar, L. A., & Henman, L. D., Small group communication: Theory and practice (8th edn., pp. 256266). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Keyton, J., & Beck, S. J. (2009). The influential role of relational messages in group interaction. Group Dynamics, 13, 1430. doi:10.1037/a0013495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1939). Field theory and experiment in social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 868896. doi:10.1086/218177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Rau, P-L. P., Li, H., & Maedche, A. (2017). Effects of a dyad’s cultural intelligence on global virtual collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 60, 5675. doi:10.1109/TPC.2016.2632842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofstrand, P., & Zakrisson, I. (2014). Competitive versus non-competitive goals in group decision-making. Small Group Research, 45, 451464. doi:10.1177/1046496414532954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mabry, E. A. (1975). An instrument for assessing content themes in group interaction. Speech Monographs, 42, 191297. doi:10.1080/03637757509375904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2002). The meaning of an online health community in the lives of its members: Roles, relationships and group dynamics. Published in the proceedings of the IEEE 2002 International Symposium on Technology and Society: Social Implications of Information and Communication Technology. doi:10.1109/ISTAS.2002.1013791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloney-Krichmar, D., & Preece, J. (2005). Multilevel analysis of sociability, usability, and community dynamics in an online health community. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12, 201232. doi:10.1145/1067860.1067864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Pena, J., & Hancock, J. T. (2006). An analysis of socioemotional and task communication in online multiplayer video games. Communication Research, 33, 92109. doi:10.1177/0093650205283103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, M. S., & Folger, J. P. (1981). A method for establishing the representational validity of interaction coding systems: Do we see what they see? Human Communication Research, 8, 2642. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00654.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(1), 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×