Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T13:13:44.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Shame and Stigma Scale (SSS-Br) for patients with head and neck cancers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

William Eduardo Pirola
Affiliation:
Post-graduate Program in Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil
Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva
Affiliation:
Health-Related Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
Cleyton Zanardo de Oliveira
Affiliation:
Health-Related Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil Education and Research, BP - A Beneficência Portuguesa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Giancarlo Lucchetti
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil
Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Brazil
David Kissane
Affiliation:
Departments of Psychiatry and Palliative Care, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
Carlos Eduardo Paiva*
Affiliation:
Health-Related Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil Department of Clinical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, São Paulo, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Carlos Eduardo Paiva, Departamento de Oncologia Clínica, Divisão de Mama e Ginecologia, Rua Antenor Duarte Vilella, 1331, Bairro Dr Paulo Prata, Barretos, SP, Brasil. CEP: 14784-400. E-mail: caredupai@gmail.com or drcarlosnap@gmail.com.

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Shame and Stigma Scale (SSS) in a sample of patients with head and neck cancers (HNC).

Methods

This is a validation study carried out in a Brazilian cancer hospital. Patients over 18 years old who knew about their HNC diagnosis were consecutively recruited, answering the SSS, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (General and Head and Neck supplement) questionnaire, and the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire. Internal consistency, test-retest procedure, convergent validity, and responsiveness analysis were the psychometric properties evaluated.

Results

A total of 122 HNC patients were included. The SSS showed appropriate internal consistency (alphas ranging from 0.71 to 0.86), test-retest reliability (higher than 0.92 with exception of the “Regret domain”), and convergent validity. The responsiveness analysis with 38 patients was able to discriminate the scores before and after prosthetic procedures.

Significance of the Results

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the SSS may be considered a valid and reliable instrument for the evaluation of Brazilian patients with HNC. Future SSS validation studies are welcome in other developing countries in order to make cancer health providers aware of these negative feelings in their HNC patients.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argerakis, GP (1990) Psychosocial considerations of the post-treatment of head and neck cancer patients. Dental Clinics of North America 34(2), 285305.Google ScholarPubMed
Brady, MJ, Cella, DF, Mo, F, Bonomi, AE, Tulsky, DS, Lloyd, SR, Deasy, S, Cobleigh, M and Shiomoto, G (1997) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology 15(3), 974986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cella, DF, Tulsky, DS, Gray, G, Sarafian, B, Linn, E, Bonomim, A, Yellen, SB, Winicour, P and Brannon, J (1993) The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. Journal of Clinical Oncology 11(3), 570–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapple, A, Ziebland, S and McPherson, A (2004) Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 328(7454), 1470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fayers, P and Machin, D (2007) Quality of Life: the Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes, 2nd Edn.Chinchester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felippu, AWD, Freire, EC, de Arruda Silva, R, Guimarães, AV and Dedivitis, RA (2016) Impact of delay in the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 82(2), 140143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferlay, J, Soerjomataram, I, Dikshit, R, Eser, S, Mathers, C, Rebelo, M, Parkin, DM, Forman, D and Bray, F (2015) Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer 136(5), E359E386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleiss, JL (1986) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Fregnani, CMS, Fregnani, JHTG, Dias de Oliveira Latorre, MdR and de Almeida, AM (2013) Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervix questionnaire in Brazil. PloS One 8(10), e77947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kissane, DW, Patel, SG, Baser, RE, Bell, R, Farberov, M, Ostroff, JS, Singh, B, Kraus, DH and Shah, JP (2013) Preliminary evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Shame and Stigma Scale in head and neck cancer. Head & Neck 35(2), 172–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebel, S, Castonguay, M, Mackness, G, Irish, J, Bezjak, A and Devins, GM (2013) The psychosocial impact of stigma in people with head and neck or lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology 22(1), 140152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGuire, S (2016) World Cancer Report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO Press, 2015. Advances in Nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 7(2), 418–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, BA, Ridner, S, Wells, N and Dietrich, M (2007) Quality of life research in head and neck cancer: a review of the current state of the science. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 62(3), 251–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, GR, Sridhar, FG, Guyatt, GH and Walter, SD (2001) Relation of distribution- and anchor-based approaches in interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life. Medical Care 39(10), 1039–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, F and Santos, C (2011) Estudo de adaptação cultural e validação da Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General em cuidados paliativos. Revista de Enfermagem Referência III Série(n 5), 4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picon, P, Gauer, GJC, Hirakata, VN, Haggstram, LM, Beidel, DC, Tuner, SM and Manfro, GG (2005) Reliability of the Social Phobia and Anxiety Inventory (SPAI) Portuguese version in a heterogeneous sample of Brazilian university students. Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria (Sao Paulo, Brazil : 1999) 27(2), 124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirola, WE, Paiva, BSR, Barroso, EM, Kissane, DW, Serrano, CVMP and Paiva, CE (2017) Translation and cultural adaptation of the Shame and Stigma Scale (SSS) into Portuguese (Brazil) to evaluate patients with head and neck cancer. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 83(6), 697704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahzani, K, Taleghani, F and Nikbakht Nasrabadi, A (2009) Disfiguring burns and the experienced reactions in Iran: consequences and strategies--a qualitative study. Burns : Journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries 35(6), 875–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sawada, NO (2002) Qualidade de vida em câncer de cabeça e pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo (USP-RP).Google Scholar
Scimago Institutions Rankings. Hospital de Câncer de Barretos. (n.d.). Available at https://www.scimagoir.com/rankings.php?sector=Health&country=Latin America. Accessed 9 September 2018.Google Scholar
Terwee, CB, Bot, SDM, de Boer, MR, van der Windt, DA, Knol, DL, Dekker, J, Bouter, LM and de Vet, HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60(1), 3442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Threader, J and McCormack, L (2016) Cancer-related trauma, stigma and growth: the “lived” experience of head and neck cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care 25(1), 157169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vartanian, JG, Carvalho, AL, Furia, CLB, Castro, G Jr, Rocha, CN, Sinitcovisky, IML, Toyota, J, Kowalski, ISG, Federico, MHH and Kowalski, LP (2007) Questionários para a avaliação de Qualidade de Vida em pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço validados no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia de Cabeça Pescoço 36(2).Google Scholar
Vartanian, JG, Carvalho, AL, Yueh, B, Furia, CL, Toyota, J, Weymuller, EA Jr and Kowalski, LP (2006) Brazilian–Portuguese validation of the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer. Head & Neck 28(12), 11151121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhuang, SM, Wu, X-F, Li, J-J and Zhang, G-H (2014) Management of lymph node metastases from an unknown primary site to the head and neck (Review). Molecular and Clinical Oncology 2(6), 917922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Pirola et al. supplementary material

Pirola et al. supplementary material 1

Download Pirola et al. supplementary material(File)
File 37.4 KB