Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:23:39.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - How do adolescents select their friends? A behavior-genetic perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Lea Pulkkinen
Affiliation:
University of Jyväskylä, Finland
Avshalom Caspi
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, London
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Friendships serve important functions for both children and adults. Across the life-span, the dynamics of friendship are complex (Hartup and Stevens, 1997; 1999) and, as yet, poorly understood. Two observations are well established: an absence of friends characterizes those who seek clinical intervention for personal problems, and good adjustment is associated with having a social network of friends. It is less certain whether friends directly contribute to our well-being, or whether well-adjusted persons find it easier to make and keep friends. Regardless, friendships provide children and adolescents with experiences that facilitate growth of social competence, providing functions critical to development of self-concept and serving as resources of emotional support, buffering against life stress (Price, 1996). Indeed, recent evidence suggests that only for children without mutual best friends does victimization predict bad behavioral outcomes; peer friendships appear to be crucial in preventing escalating cycles of peer abuse (Hodges, Malone and Perry, 1997; Hodges, Boivin, Vitaro and Bukowski, 1999). Friendship relations are implicated in children's social and emotional growth, influencing children's school adaptations, adjustment to major life transitions, and the acquisition of social skills and values (Bukowski, Newcomb, and Hartup, 1996). The developmental significance of friendships includes who one's friends are, as well as the stability and quality of those friendship relationships across time. And, because the identity of one's friends accounts for more outcome variance than whether one has friends (Hartup and Stevens, 1997), it is important to study the qualitative features of friendship selection.

Type
Chapter
Information
Paths to Successful Development
Personality in the Life Course
, pp. 106 - 126
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboud, F. E., and Mendelson, M. J. (1996). Determinants of friendship selection and quality: developmental perspectives. In W. M. Bukowski, A. F. Newcomb, and W. W. Hartup (eds.), The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence, Cambridge University Press, 87–112
Bryne, D., and Griffitt, W. (1973). Interpersonal attraction. Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 317–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., and Hartup, W. W. (1996). Friendship and its significance in childhood and adolescence: introduction and comment. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., and Hartup, W. W. (eds.), The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence, Cambridge University Press, 1–15
Buss, D. M. (1984). Toward a psychology of person-environment correspondence: the role of spouse selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 361–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challman, R. C. (1932). Factors influencing friendships among preschool children. Child Development, 3, 146–58Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M. (1977). Sources of peer group homogeneity. Sociology of Education, 50, 227–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennett, S. T., and Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity: the case of adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, L. A., and Bauman, K. E. (1988). Influence and selection in the friend-adolescent relationship: findings from studies of adolescent smoking and drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 289–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, J. D., Bucholz, K. K., Madden, P. A. F., Slutske, W. S., and Heath, A. C. (1998). Peer substance use during adolescence: evidence for shared environmental influences. Behavior Genetics, 28, 469 (abstr)
Hartup, W. W., and Stevens, N. (1997). Friendships and adaptation in the life course. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartup, W. W., and Stevens, N. (1999). Friendships and adaptation across the life span. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 76–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, V. E., Boivin, M., Vitaro, F., and Bukowski, W. M. (1999). The power of friendship: protection against an escalating cycle of peer victimization. Developmental Psychology, 35, 94–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, V. E., Malone, M. J., and Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kandel, D. B. (1978a). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D. B. (1978b). Similarity in real-life adolescent friendship pairs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 306–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kandel, D., Davies, M., and Baydar, N. (1990). The creation of interpersonal contexts: homophily in dyadic relationships in adolescence and young adulthood. In L. Robins and M. Rutter (eds.), Straight and devious pathways from childhood to adulthood, Cambridge University Press, 221–41
Kendler, K. S. (1997). Social support: A genetic-epidemiologic analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1398–404Google ScholarPubMed
Manke, B., McGuire, S., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., and Plomin, R. (1995). Genetic contributions to adolescents' extrafamilial social interactions: teachers, best friends, and peers. Social Development, 4, 238–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nance, W. E., Corey, L. A., and Eaves, L. J. (1980). A model for the analysis of mate selection in the marriages of twins. Acta Geneticae, Medicae et Gemellologiae, 29, 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nance, W. E., Corey, L. A., Rose, R. J., and Eaves, L. J. (1981). Relevance of the marriages of twins to the causal analysis of nonrandom mating. In Twin Research 3 Part B. Intelligence, Personality, and Development, Gedda, L., Parisi, P., and Nance, W. E. (eds.), Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 61–71
Price, J. M. (1996). Friendships of maltreated children and adolescents: contexts for expressing and modifying relationship history. In Bukowski, W. M., Newcomb, A. F., and Hartup, W. W. (eds.), The company they keep: friendship in childhood and adolescence, Cambridge University Press, 262–85
Pulkkinen, L. (1987). Offensive and defensive aggression in humans: a longitudinal perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 13, 197–2123.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulkkinen, L., Kaprio, J., and Rose, R. J. (1999). Peers, teachers, and parents as raters of twins' behavioral and emotional problems, and adjustment: the multidimensional peer nomination inventory. Twin Research, 2, 274–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, R. J. (1998). A developmental behavioral-genetic perspective on alcoholism risk. Alcohol Health and Research World, 22, 131–43Google Scholar
Rose, R. J., Kaprio, J., Winter, T., Koskenvuo, M., and Viken, R. J. (1999). Familial and socioregional environmental effects on abstinence from alcohol at age sixteen. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Suppl. 13, 63–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schooley, M. (1936). Personality resemblances among married couples. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 31, 340–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolson, J. M., and Urberg, K. A. (1993). Similarity between adolescent best friends. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8, 274–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urberg, K. A. (1999). Peer influences in childhood and adolescence, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, Journal of Developmental Psychology, 45, 1–183Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×