Abelson, R. P., and Levi, A. (1985). Decision making and decision theory. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, 3rd edition, Vol. 1 (pp. 231–310). New York: Random House

Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons: Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, 488–500CrossRef

Allport, F. H., and Lepkin, M. (1945). Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people believe them. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40, 3–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Association of Universities. (2001). Report on individual and institutional financial conflict of interest. http://www.aau.edu/research/coi.01.pdf

American Medical Association. (2002, July 22). Code of medical ethics, section E-8.03, Available: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/8469.html

Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., and Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. American Economic Review, 85(5), 1337–1343Google Scholar

Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (2002). Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 87–102Google ScholarPubMed

Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45, 223–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cain, D. M. (2004). Low quality compliance: Regulating behavior off the books. Unpublished manuscript. Carnegie Mellon University

Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (forthcoming). The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies

Cain, D. M., Loewenstein, G., and Moore, D. A. (2004). Honesty and its discontents: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Unpublished manuscript. Carnegie Mellon University

Camerer, C. (2000). Prospect theory in the wild. In D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (Eds.), Choice, values, and frames, (pp. 288–300). New York: Cambridge University Press

Camerer, C. and Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 7–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., and Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97(5), 1232–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castellan, N. J. (1977). Decision making with multiple probabilistic cues. In N. Castellan, J. Pisoni, and M. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive Theory, Vol. 2 (pp. 288–300). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Chapman, G. B., and Bornstein, B. H. (1996). The more you ask for the more you get: Anchoring in personal injury verdicts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 519–5403.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B., and Johnson, E. J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 115–153CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Choudhry, N. K., Stelfox, H. T., and Detsky, A. S. (2002). Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(5)Google ScholarPubMed

Crawford, V. P., and Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica, 50(6), 1431–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dana, J., and Loewenstein, G. (2003). A social science perspective on gifts to physicians from industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290(2), 252–255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, M. (2001). Introduction. In M. Davis and A. Stark (Eds.), Conflict of interest in the professions, (pp. 3–19). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Davis, M., and Stark, A. (2001). Conflict of interest in the professions. New York: Oxford University Press

Dutton, D. G., and Lake, R. A. (1973). Threat of own prejudice and reverse discrimination in interracial situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dye, R. A., (2001). An evaluation of essays on disclosure and the disclosure literature in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, (32), 181–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ebbesen, E. B., and Konečni, V. J. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts: The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Einhorn, H. (1980). Learning from experience and suboptimal rules in decision making. In T. S. Wallsten (Ed.), Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior, (pp 1–20). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates

Einhorn, H. and Hogarth, R. (1978). Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychological Review, 35(5), 395–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., and Mussweiler, T. (2001). First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 657–669CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond Heuristics and biases. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 83–115)CrossRef

Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46(2), 107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, D. T., and Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21–38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilovich, T. (1987). Secondhand information and social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn't so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press

Gunderson, M. (1997). Eliminating conflicts of interest in managed care organizations through disclosure and consent. Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 27, 5–15Google Scholar

Hastie, R., Schkade, D. A., and Payne, J. W. (1999). Juror judgments in civil cases: Effects of plaintiff's requests and plaintiff's identity on punitive damage awards. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 445–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Healy, P., and Palepu, K. (2000). Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Proceedings of the JAE Rochester Conference (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=258514)Google Scholar

Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 197–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, E. E., and Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kassirer, J. P. (2003). Physicians' ties with the pharmaceutical industry: A critical element of a wildly successful marketing network. Unpublished manuscript. Boston: Tufts University

Keysar, B., Ginzel, L. E., and Bazerman, M. H. (1995). States of affairs and states of mind: The effect of knowledge of beliefs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klayman, J., and Ha, Y. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94(2), 211–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krimsky, S., Rothenberg, L. (2001). Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: Editorial practices and author disclosures. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7, 205–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(4), 636–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loewenstein, G., Moore, D. A., and Weber, R. (2003). Paying $1 to lose $2: Misperceptions of the value of information in predicting the performance of others. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings

Loftus, E. F. (1979). The malleability of human memory. American Scientist, 67(May–June), 312–320Google ScholarPubMed

Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., and Preston, E. (1984). Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1231–1243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Messick, D. M., and Sentis, K. P. (1979). Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 418–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michaely, R. and Womack, K. L. (1999). Conflict of interest and the credibility of underwriter analyst recommendations. Review of Financial Studies, 12, 653–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Monin, B., and Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Moore, D. A., and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Self-interest, automaticity, and the psychology of conflict of interest. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, D. A., Loewenstein, G., Tanlu, L., and Bazerman, M. H. (2003). Conflict of interest, and the unconscious intrusion of bias. Unpublished manuscript. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University

Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(2), 136–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussweiler, T., and Strack, F. (2001). Considering the impossible: Explaining the effects of implausible anchors. Social Cognition, 19, 145–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., and Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: Considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Northcraft, G. B., and Neale, M. A. (1987). Experts, amateurs, and real estate. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., and Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 87–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pratkanis, A. R., Greenwald, A. G., Leippe, M. R., and Baumgardner, M. H. (1988). In search of reliable persuasion effects: The sleeper effect is dead: Long live the sleeper effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 203–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social psychology, (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: AcademicCrossRef

Ross, L., and Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill

Russo, J. E., and Shoemaker, P. J. H. (1989). Decision traps. New York: Simon and Schuster

SEC. (2000, September 13). Hearing on auditor independence. Available: http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71300/testimony/shamis1.htm

Skurnik, I., Moskowitz, G. B., and Johnson, M. (2002). Biases in remembering true and false information: The illusions of truth and falseness. Unpublished manuscript. University of Toronto

Skurnik, I., Park, D. C., and Schwarz, N. (2002). How warnings become recommendations: Paradoxical effects of health warnings on beliefs of older adults. Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan

Strack, F., and Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strack, F., and Mussweiler, T. (in press). Resisting influence: Judgmental correction and its goals. In J. P. Forgas and K. Williams (Eds.), The Sydney symposium of social psychology: Social influence. Cambridge University Press

Surowiecki, J. (2002). The financial page: The talking cure. The New Yorker Magazine, Dec. 9, 54Google Scholar

Tenery, R. M. (2000). Interactions between physicians and the health care technology industry. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(3), 391–393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 25, pp. 331–376). New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Thaler, R. H. (1991). The Psychology and Economics Conference Handbook. Quasi rational economics, (pp. 189–195). New York: Russell Sage Foundation

Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(4), 400–408CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Vickers, M., France, M., Thornton, E., Henry, D., Timmons, H., and McNamee, M. (2002, May 13). How corrupt is Wall Street? Business Week

Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, 97–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilson, T. D., Houston, C., Etling, K. M., and Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 387–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar