Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:56:24.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Observations on the epidemiology of lumpy skin disease in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

F. G. Davies
Affiliation:
Veterinary Research Laboratory, P.O. Kabete, Kenya
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lumpy skin disease virus strains isolated in Kenya over a period of some 20 years have proved to be serologically identical. They were indistinguishable by indirect fluorescent antibody and serum neutralization tests from the South African Neethling and West African serotypes. These two serological methods proved of value in studying the antibody responses to infection.

While epizootic spread of LSD has occurred in Kenya, most cases are of a sporadic nature and are thought to be the result of accidental contacts with a maintenance cycle. There is evidence of antibody to LSD in the African buffalo (Syncerus coffer) in those areas where LSD is considered to be enzootic in Kenya, and also in small numbers of domestic cattle. No buffalo or bovine sera contained antibody to cowpox virus. An area enzootic for LSD is proposed and it is suggested that the maintenance cycle involves the buffalo. No antibody was found in the other wild ruminant species examined.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

References

Ali, B. H. & Obeid, H. M. (1977). Investigation of the first outbreak of lumpy skin disease in the Sudan. British Veterinary Journal 133, 184189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayres-Smith, R. A. (1960). The symptoms and clinical diagnosis of lumpy skin diease. Veterinary Record 72, 469472.Google Scholar
Coakley, W. & Capstick, P. B. (1961). Protection of cattle against lumpy skin disease, factors affecting small scale production of a tissue culture propagated virus vaccine. Research in Veterinary Science 2, 369371.Google Scholar
Davies, F. G., Krauss, H., Lund, L. J. & Taylor, M. (1971). The laboratory diagnosis of lumpy skin disease. Research in Veterinary Science 12, 123127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, F. G. (1976). Characteristics of a pox virus causing a pox disease of sheep and goats in Kenya with observations on the epidemiology and control. Journal of Hygiene 76, 163171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, F. G. & Atema, C. (1978). The antibody response in sheep to infection with a Kenyan sheep and goat pox virus. Journal of Comparative Pathology 88, 205210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diesel, A. M. (1949). The epizootiology of lumpy skin disease in South Africa.Proceedings of the 14th International Veterinary Congress London, vol. 2, pp. 492500.Google Scholar
MacOwan, K. D. S. (1959). Observations on the epizootiology of lumpy skin disease in Kenya during the first year of its occurrence in Kenya. Bulletin of Epizootic Disease of Africa 7, 720.Google Scholar
Office International des Epizootics (1959–78). Statistiques.Google Scholar
von Backstrom, U. (1945). Ngamiland cattle disease, a preliminary report on a new disease, the aetiological agent being probably of an infectious nature. Journal of the South African Veterinary Medical Association 16, 2935.Google Scholar
Woods, J. A. (1974). A skin condition of cattle. Veterinary Record 95, 326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed