Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:20:18.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Viscoaugmentation as a treatment for leakage around the Provox® 2 voice rehabilitation system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. A. Luff ,
S. Izzat  and
W. T. Farrington
D. A. Luff*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
S. Izzat
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
W. T. Farrington
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr D. A. Luff, F.R.C.S., Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tracheo-oesophageal puncture for voice restoration is a well-established technique post-laryngectomy. A number of complications can occur with the creation of a tracheo-oesophageal fistula (TOF) and in the subsequent management of the patient with an indwelling voice rehabilitation system.

This article is the first to report the use of Hylaform®, a colourless viscoelastic gel, to treat an intractable case of leakage around a Provox® 2 voice prosthesis. The procedure which required no anaesthesia resulted in no further leak around the valve to the present day, now more than four weeks post-viscoaugmentation.

Keywords

Tracheo-oesophageal fistulaVoiceProsthesisComplications
Type
Clinical Records
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 113 , Issue 9 , September 1999 , pp. 847 - 848
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Garth, R. J. N., McRae, A., Rhys Evans, P. H. (1991) Tracheo-oesophageal puncture: a review of problems and complications. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105: 750–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilgers, F. J. M., Schouwenburg, P. F. (1990) A new low resistance self retaining prosthesis (Provox™) for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 100: 1202–1207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hylaform® Viscoelastic gel. Physician package insert. Collagen (UK) Ltd, Thame, Oxon, OX9 3FR.Google Scholar
Laccourreye, O., Menard, M., Crevier-Buchman, L., Couloigner, V., Brasnu, D. (1997) In situ lifetime causes for replacement and complications of the Provox™ voice prosthesis. Laryngoscope 107: 527–530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natarajan, B., Richardson, M. D., Irvine, B. W. H., Thomas, M. (1994) Provox™ voice prosthesis and Candida albicans growth: a preliminary report of clinical, mycological and scanning electron microscopic assessment. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 108: 666–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Personal Communication with Ann Richardson, Affairs Consultant Collagen (UK) Ltd, Thame, Oxon, OX9 3FR.Google Scholar
Singer, M. I., Blom, E. D. (1980) An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 89: 529–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Provox® 2 Voice Rehabilitation system – Physician's and patient's manual. Atos Medical, Hörby, Sweden.Google Scholar