Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:55:49.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implant survival rate in bone-anchored hearing aid users: long-term results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2011

E Wallberg ,
G Granström ,
A Tjellström  and
J Stalfors
E Wallberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
G Granström
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
A Tjellström
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
J Stalfors
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Erik Wallberg, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gröna Stråket 9, SE-411 35 Göteborg, Sweden E-mail: erikwallberg@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the long-term survival rate of bone-anchored hearing aid implants, and to assess the number of patients who stop using their bone-anchored hearing aid.

Method:

Patients who underwent bone-anchored hearing aid surgery between September 1977 and December 1986 were identified from a prospective database. Data were collected from patient records.

Results:

During the study period, 143 patients were fitted with a bone-anchored hearing aid. Records from 132 patients were found, with a mean follow up of nine years. A total of 150 implants were installed in these patients. A total of 41 implants (27 per cent) were lost during follow up: 17 lost osseointegration, 16 were removed and eight were lost due to direct trauma. At the end of follow up, 119/132 (90 per cent) patients were still using their bone-anchored hearing aid.

Conclusion:

Despite a high incidence of implant loss over time, a large number of patients still continued to use their bone-anchored hearing aid.

Keywords

Hearing AidOsseointegrationSurgical Procedures, OperativeTitaniumComplications
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 125 , Issue 11 , November 2011 , pp. 1131 - 1135
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Results presented at the Second International Symposium on Bone Conduction Hearing – Craniofacial Osseointegration, 11–13 June 2009, Gothenburg, Sweden

References

1Tjellström, A, Granström, G, Odersjö, M. Survival rate of self-tapping implants for bone-anchored hearing aids. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:101–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Rasmusson, L, Roos, J, Bystedt, H. A 10-year follow-up study of titanium dioxide-blasted implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:36–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Albrektsson, T, Wennerberg, A. The impact of oral implants – past and future, 1966–2042. J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:327Google Scholar
4Tjellstrom, A, Granstrom, G. Long-term follow-up with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a review of the first 100 patients between 1977 and 1985. Ear Nose Throat J 1994;73:112–14Google Scholar
5Granstrom, G, Bergstrom, K, Odersjo, M, Tjellstrom, A. Osseointegrated implants in children: experience from our first 100 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;125:85–92Google Scholar
6Granstrom, G. Craniofacial osseointegration. Oral Dis 2007;13:261–9Google Scholar
7Larsson, A, Stalfors, J, Granstrom, G. Collection of data on clinical scoring of skin reactions and failures of extraoral titanium implants from patients charts 1978 up to today. 11th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Auditory Implantable Technologies. Stockholm, unpublished dataGoogle Scholar
8Tjellstrom, A, Lindstrom, J, Hallen, O, Albrektsson, T, Branemark, PI. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the temporal bone. A clinical study on bone-anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol 1981;2:304–10Google Scholar
9Proops, DW. The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: surgical methods and complications. J Laryngol Otol 1996;21 (suppl):7–12Google Scholar
10House, JW, Kutz, JW Jr.Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:213–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Mylanus, EA, Cremers, CW, Snik, AF, van den Berge, NW. Clinical results of percutaneous implants in the temporal bone. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:81–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Reyes, RA, Tjellstrom, A, Granstrom, G. Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: a 0- to 8-year follow-up. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:272–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Badran, K, Arya, AK, Bunstone, D, Mackinnon, N. Long-term complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: a 14-year experience. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:170–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Hobson, JC, Roper, AJ, Andrew, R, Rothera, MP, Hill, P, Green, KM. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:132–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Granstrom, G. Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:579–85CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Holme, L-E. Titanium fixture loss. An actuarial analysis, Abstract book, page 26, 2nd International Symposium on Bone Conduction Hearing-Craniofacial Osseointegration, Göteborg, Sweden, 11–13th June 2009Google Scholar
17Ovegard, A, Ramstrom, AB. Individual follow-up of hearing aid fitting. Scand Audiol 1994;23:57–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Sennerby, L, Gottlow, J, Rosengren, A, Flynn, M. An experimental evaluation of a new craniofacial implant using the rabbit tibia model: Part II. Biomechanical findings. Otol Neurotol 2010;31:840–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed