Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:46:20.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk sharing agreements: What lessons from Italy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2011

Livio Garattini
Affiliation:
“Mario Negri” Institute for Pharmacological Research
Gianluigi Casadei
Affiliation:
“Mario Negri” Institute for Pharmacological Research

Abstract

Italy is one of the few countries that have matured substantial experience of risk-sharing agreements so far. The first performance-based arrangement was agreed in July 2006, and as of October 2010, eighteen contracts have been in force.

The complex management of discount schemes is entirely based on Web registries run by AIFA, the Italian drug agency. The system validates each prescription and automatically requests the hospital pharmacy by e-mail to release the drug. If a patient meets nonresponder criteria, the hospital pharmacist should apply for pay-back to the manufacturer.

There are still some important question marks to address. First of all, nonresponders have to be documented by health authorities, otherwise any undocumented nonresponder will be paid as a success. Another question concerns pre-set timing. Although the scientific rationale of the nonresponder criteria for each drug has not been made public, time frames appear too short to allow a reliable assessment. Another question is whether regions, which are financially accountable in Italy for pharmaceutical expenditure, are really able to claw back refunds from manufacturers. Unfortunately here again there are no official figures, and regions do not seem yet able to quantify the amount of pay-back matured in the 4 previous years. The delayed and incomplete availability of pay-back procedures may be one explanation.

Type
POLICIES
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. AIFA – Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Allineamento Procedure di Gestione Rimborsi Cost/Risk Share e Payment by Result. Rome, November 13, 2009. http://antineoplastici.agenziafarmaco.it/Comunicato_Procedure_Gestione_Rimborsi.pdf (accessed October 8, 2010).Google Scholar
2. AIFA – Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Determinazione 24 Luglio 2006. Regime di rimborsabilità e prezzo di vendita della specialita’ medicinale Tarceva (erlotinib). http://antineoplastici.agenziafarmaco.it/tarceva.pdf (accessed October 8, 2010).Google Scholar
3. AIFA – Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Farmaci sottoposti a monitoraggio. http://monitoraggio-farmaci.agenziafarmaco.it/ (accessed November 15, 2010.Google Scholar
4. AIFA – Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco. Rapporto Nazionale 2007 del Registro Farmaci Oncologici sottoposti a Monitoraggio. http://antineoplastici.agenziafarmaco.it/rapporto_RFOM_2007.htm (accessed October 8, 2010).Google Scholar
5. AstraZeneca. Overview of AstraZeneca SPA scheme. http://www.simplyaz.co.uk/_mshost3000873/content/resources/media/iressa-spa-an-overview.pdf (accessed October 11, 2010).Google Scholar
6. Raftery, J. Analysis. Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: A costly failure. BMJ. 2010;340:c1672CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Regione Toscana. Decree of June 21, 2010, no. 609. Regional Official Bulletin no. 26 of June 30, 2010.Google Scholar
8. Russo, P, Mennini, FS, Siviero, PD, Rasi, G. Time to market and patient access to new oncology products in Italy: A multistep pathway from European context to regional health care providers. Ann Oncol. 2010;21:20812087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed