Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-vmcqm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-14T16:59:45.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of a Community-Engaged Arts Program on Older Adults’ Well-being*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2014

Alison Phinney ,
Elaine M. Moody  and
Jeff A. Small
Alison Phinney*
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia School of Nursing
Elaine M. Moody
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia School of Nursing
Jeff A. Small
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia School of Audiology and Speech Sciences
*
†La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à : / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Alison Phinney, Ph.D. University of British Columbia School of Nursing T201 2211 Wesbrook Mall Vancouver, BC V5X 2Y4 (alison.phinney@nursing.ubc.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This mixed-methods study evaluated the effect of a community-engaged arts program on the physical, emotional, and social well-being of seniors. Weekly workshops were offered over a three-year period at community centers where artists worked with four groups of seniors to produce a collective art piece or performance for public presentation. Participants completed pre- and post- questionnaires, and group interviews were conducted at the program’s end. Paired t-test analyses indicated that seniors experienced improvement in perceived overall health, experience of pain, and sense of community. Interpretive descriptive analysis of the group interviews revealed six themes that informed understanding : (1) providing structure and discipline; (2) facilitating coping; (3) requiring hard work and effort; (4) bringing out one’s artistic side; (5) promoting social involvement; and (6) making a contribution. These results are consistent with previous research and contribute to further understanding of how community-engaged arts can benefit the well-being of older people.

Résumé

Cette étude utilisant des méthodes mixtes a évalué l'effet d'un programme d'arts communautaires engagés sur le bien-être physique, émotionnel et social des personnes âgées. Ateliers hebdomadaires ont été offerts pendant une période de trois ans dans des centres communautaires où les artistes ont collaboré avec quatre groupes de personnes âgées pour produire une œuvre d'art collective ou la performance d'une présentation publique. Les participants ont rempli questionnaires avant et après et des entretiens de groupe ont été menées à la fin du programme. Des analyses t-test appariés ont indiqué que les personnes âgées ont connu une amélioration perçue dans leur état de santé générale, l’expérience de la douleur, et le sens de la communauté. Une analyse descriptive et intérpretative des entretiens de groupe a révélé six thèmes qui ont éclairé la compréhension: (1) fournissant de la structure et de la discipline; (2) facilitant l’adaptation; (3) nécessitant un travail acharné et des efforts; (4) faisant ressortir son côté artistique; (5) la promotion de la participation sociale; et (6) apportant une contribution. Ces résultats concordent avec les recherches antérieures et contribuent à une meilleure compréhension de la façon dont les arts communautaires engagés peuvent favoriser le bien-être des personnes âgées.

Keywords

agingarts and healthcommunity artsevaluationvieillissmentart(s) et santéarts communautairesévaluation
Type
Research Note / Note de recherche
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , September 2014 , pp. 336 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was funded by the University of British Columbia School of Nursing Katherine McMillan Fund.

References

Angus, J. (2002). A review of evaluation in community-based art for health activity in the UK. London: Health Development Agency.Google Scholar
Castora-Binkley, M., Noelker, L., Prohaska, T., & Satariano, W. (2010). Impact of arts participation on health outcomes for older adults. Journal of Aging Humanities and the Arts, 4, 352–367.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. D., Perlstein, S., Chapline, J., Kelly, J., Firth, K. M., & Simmens, S. (2006). The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults. The Gerontologist, 46, 726–734.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. D., Perlstein, S., Chapline, J., Kelly, J., Firth, K. M., & Simmens, S. (2007). The impact of professionally conducted cultural programs on the physical health, mental health, and social functioning of older adults—2-year results. Journal of Aging Humanities and the Arts, 1, 5–22.Google Scholar
Cooley, N. J. (2005). Arts and culture in medicine and health: A survey research paper. Retrieved 4 July 2014 fromhttp://artshealthnetwork.ca/ahnc/canadian-forum-on-arts-health-2005-summary.pdf.Google Scholar
Greaves, C. J., & Farbus, L. (2006). Effects of creative and social activity on the health and well-being of socially isolated older people: Outcomes from a multi-method observational study. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(3), 134–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanna, G. (2006). Focus on creativity and aging in the United States. Generations, 30(1), 47–49.Google Scholar
Herr, K. A., Spratt, K., Mobily, P. R., & Richardson, G. (2004). Pain intensity assessment in older adults: Use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales. Clinical Journal of Pain, 20, 207–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lally, E. (2009). ‘The power to heal us with a smile and a song’: Senior well-being, music-based participatory arts and the value of qualitative evidence. Journal of Arts and Communities, 1, 25–44.Google Scholar
Lawton, M. P. (1975). The Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale: A revision. Journal of Gerontology, 30, 85–89.Google Scholar
Lee, A. (1998). Community arts workbook: Another vital link. Toronto: Ontario Arts Council.Google Scholar
Lowe, S. (2000). Creating community: Art for community development. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 29, 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyness, J. M., King, D. A., Conwell, Y., Duberstein, P. R., Eberly, S., Sörensen, S. M., et al. (2004). Self-rated health, depression, and one year health outcomes in older primary care patients. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 110–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancini, J. A., Bowen, G. L., Martin, J. A., & Ware, W. B. (2003). The Community Connections Index: Measurement of community engagement and sense of community. Paper presentation, Hawaii International Conference on the Social Sciences, May 28–31, 2003, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Murray, M., & Crummett, A. (2010). ‘I don’t think they knew we could do these sorts of things’: Social representations of community and participation in community arts by older people. Journal of Health Psychology, 15, 777–785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, T., Curtis, K., & Stephens, J. (2003). Do community-based arts projects result in social gains? A review of the literature. Community Development Journal, 38, 310–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shea, E., & Leime, A. (2012). The impact of the Bealtaine arts programme on the quality of life, wellbeing and social interaction of older people in Ireland. Ageing and Society, 32, 851–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172.Google Scholar
Putland, C. (2008). Lost in translation: the question of evidence linking community-based arts and health promotion. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and Social Psychology B, 27, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, P. J., & Weiss, C. H. (2007). Theory-based evaluation: Reflections ten years on. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 63–81.Google Scholar
Ruiz, J. (2004). A literature review of the evidence base for culture, the arts and sport policy. Research and Economic Unit, Scottish Executive Education Department. Retrieved 4 July 2014 fromhttp://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/17002/0023718.pdf.Google Scholar
Scheier, M. F., Wrosch, C., Baum, A., Cohen, S., Matire, L. M., Matthews, K. A., et al. (2006). The Life Engagement Test: Assessing purpose in life. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 291–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A., Phongsathorn, V., Bielawska, C., & Katona, C. (1996). Screening for depression among geriatric inpatients with short versions of the Geriatric Depression Scale. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 11, 915–918.3.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State of the Field Committee. (2009). State of the field report: Arts in health care 2009. Washington, DC: Society for the Arts in Healthcare.Google Scholar
Thomas, V. S., Rockwood, K., & McDowell, I. (1998). Multidimensionality in instrumental and basic activities of daily living. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thorne, S., Reimer Kirkham, C., & O’Flynn-Magee, K. (2004). The analytic challenge in interpretive description. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation. (2003). 2003 Arts Policy. City of Vancouver, Canada. Retrieved fromhttp://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Parks-Art-Policy-2003.pdf Retrieved July 4, 2014.Google Scholar
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar