Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-nbtfq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:02:11.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

CAESAREAN SECTION AND MATERNAL CHOICES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2004

JANE WEAVER
Affiliation:
Thames Valley University, London

Extract

In the 1960s caesarean section accounted for approximately 3% of births in many nations of the Western world. By the mid-1980's, however, this rate was beginning to increase and concern was not only being expressed at the rising numbers of babies being delivered abdominally but also at the four-fold difference in national rates, from 5% of births in Czechoslovakia to 18% of births in the United States. This difference, it was argued, could not be explained either by variability in the characteristics of women living in these various countries, nor in their fetuses. The increased use of caesarean section at this time was attributed to a lowering of the threshold at which the operation was being used to manage dystocia (delayed progress in labour), breech presentation, fetal distress and the delivery of small or pre-term infants. The large difference between caesarean rates in North America and some European countries was felt to be due to differences in the management of dystocia and of women who had previous caesarean deliveries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)