Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:29:47.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outcomes after balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis in children and adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2005

Carlos A. C. Pedra ,
Roger Sidhu ,
Brian W. McCrindle ,
David G. Nykanen ,
Robert N. Justo ,
Robert M. Freedom  and
Lee N. Benson
Carlos A. C. Pedra
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Roger Sidhu
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Brian W. McCrindle
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
David G. Nykanen
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Robert N. Justo
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Robert M. Freedom
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Lee N. Benson
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, The Variety Club Catheterization Laboratories, The Hospital for Sick Children, The University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the long-term outcomes and risk factors for, reintervention after balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis in children aged 6 months or older. Background: Although balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis has become a primary therapeutic strategy, few data are available regarding long-term outcomes. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of 87 children who had undergone balloon dilation of the aortic valve at median age of 6.9 years. Results: The procedure was completed in 98% of the children, with an average reduction in the gradient across the valve of 64 ± 28%, and without mortality. Of the children, 76 had been followed for a mean of 6.3 ± 4.2 years. Reintervention on the aortic valve was required in 32 children, with 12 undergoing reintervention within 6 months, with 1 death. Another patient had died over the period of follow-up due to a non-cardiac event. Estimated freedom from reintervention was 86% at 1 year, 67% at 5 years, and 46% at 12 years. Parametric modeling of the hazard function showed a brief early phase of increased risk, superimposed on an ongoing constant risk. The only incremental risk factor for the early phase was a residual gradient immediately subsequent to the procedure greater than 30 mmHg. Incremental risk factors for the constant phase included the presence of symmetric valvar opening, and greater than moderate regurgitation immediately after dilation. Conclusion: Long-term survival was excellent, albeit that the need for further reintervention was high due to the palliative nature of the procedure.

Keywords

Interventional catheterizationcongenital heart diseasepediatric cardiologyaortic valvar stenosisoutcomes
Type
Original Article
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , June 2004 , pp. 315 - 321
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Freedom RM, Mawson JB, Yoo SJ, Benson LN. Left ventricular tract obstruction. In: Freedom RM, Mawson JB, Yoo SJ, Benson LN (eds). Congenital Heart Disease. Textbook of Angiography. Futura Publishing Company Inc., Armonk, NY, 1997, pp 787–847.
Lababidi Z, Wu J, Walls JT. Percutaneous balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Results in 23 patients. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 194–197.Google Scholar
Helgason H, Keane JF, Fellows KE, Kulik TJ, Lock JE. Balloon dilation of the aortic valve. Studies in normal lambs and in children with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 816–822.Google Scholar
Sholler GF, Keane JF, Perry SB, Sanders SP, Lock JE. Balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis: results and influence of technical and morphological features on outcome. Circulation 1988; 78: 351–360.Google Scholar
Vogel M, Benson L, Burrows P, Smallhorn JF, Freedom RM. Balloon dilation of congenital aortic valve stenosis in infants and children; short and intermediate results. Br Heart J 1989; 62: 148–153.Google Scholar
Shaddy RE, Boucek MM, Sturttevant JE, Ruttenberg HD, Orsmond GS. Gradient reduction, aortic valve regurgitation and prolapse after balloon aortic valvuloplasty in 32 consecutive patients with congenital aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 451–456.Google Scholar
Rocchini AP, Beekman RH, Shachar GB, Benson L, Schwartz D, Kan JS. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty: results of the valvuloplasty and angioplasty of congenital anomalies registry. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 784–789.Google Scholar
O’Connor BK, Beekman RH, Rocchini AP, Rosenthal A. Intermediate term effectiveness of balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. A prospective follow up study. Circulation 1991; 84: 732–738.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld HM, Landzberg MJ, Perry SB, Colan SD, Keane JF, Lock JE. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in the young adult with congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 1112–1117.Google Scholar
Gatzoulis MA, Rigby ML, Shinebourne EA, Redington A. Contemporary results of balloon valvuloplasty and surgical valvotomy for congenital aortic stenosis. Arch Dis Child 1995; 73: 66–69.Google Scholar
Moore P, Egito E, Mowrey H, Perry SB, Lock JE, Keane JE. Midterm results of balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis: predictors of success. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 1257–1263.Google Scholar
Kuhn MA, Latson LA, Cheatham JP, Fletcher SE, Foreman C. Management of pediatric patients with isolated valvar aortic stenosis by balloon aortic valvuloplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996; 39: 55–61.Google Scholar
Justo RN, McCrindle BW, Benson LN, Williams WG, Freedom RM, Smallhorn JF. Aortic valve regurgitation after surgical vs. percutaneous balloon valvotomy for congenital aortic valve stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 1332–1338.Google Scholar
Galal O, Rao PS, Al-Fadley F, Wilson AD. Follow-up results of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in children with special reference to causes of late aortic insufficiency. Am Heart J 1997; 133: 418–427.Google Scholar
Borghi A, Agnoletti G, Valsecchi O, Carminati M. Aortic balloon dilatation for congenital aortic stenosis: report of 90 cases (1986–98). Heart 1999; 82: e10.Google Scholar
Demkow M, Ruzyllo W, Ksiezycka E, et al. Long-term follow-up results of balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis: predictors of late outcome. J Inv Cardiol 1999; 11: 220–226.Google Scholar
Jindal RC, Saxena A, Juneja R, Kothari SS, Shrivastava S. Long-term results of balloon aortic valvotomy for congenital aortic stenosis in children and adolescents. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 623–628.Google Scholar
Lofland GK, McCrindle BW, Williams WG, Blackstone EH, Tchervenkov CI, Sittiwangkul R, Jonas RA. Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate: a multi-institutional study of management, outcomes and risk factors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 10–27.Google Scholar
Baram S, McCrindle BW, Han RK, Benson LN, Freedom RM, Nykanen DG. Outcomes of uncomplicated aortic valve stenosis presenting in infants. Am Heart J 2003; 145: 1063–1070.Google Scholar
Hosking MCK, Benson LN, Freedom RM. A femoral vein–femoral artery loop technique for aortic dilation in children. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1991; 23: 253–256.Google Scholar
Lima VC, Zahn E, Houde C, Smallhorn J, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Non-invasive determination of the systolic peak-to-peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 115–119.Google Scholar
Blackstone EH, Naftel DC, Turner ME Jr. The decomposition of time-varying hazard into phases, each incorporating a separate stream of concomitant information. J Am Stat Assoc 1986; 81: 615–624.Google Scholar
Vittiello R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen D, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 1433–1440.Google Scholar
McCrindle BW (for the VACA Registry investigators). Independent predictors of immediate results of percutaneous balloon aortic valvotomy in childhood. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77: 286–293.Google Scholar
Pedra CAC, Pedra SRF, Braga SLN, et al. Short and midterm follow-up results of valvuloplasty with a balloon catheter for congenital aortic stenosis. Arq Bras Cardiol 2003; 81: 120–128.Google Scholar
Shim D, Lloyd TR, Beekman RH III. Usefulness of repeat balloon aortic valvuloplasty in children. Am J Cardiol 1997; 79: 1141–1146.Google Scholar
Satou GM, Perry SB, Lock JE, Piercey GE, Keane JF. Repeat balloon dilation of congenital valvar aortic stenosis: immediate results and midterm outcome. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1999; 47: 47–51.Google Scholar
Waller BF, McKay C, VanTassel JW, Taliercio C, Howard J, Green F. Catheter balloon valvuloplasty of stenotic aortic valves. Part I. Anatomic basis and mechanism of balloon dilation. Clin Cardiol 1991; 14: 836–846.Google Scholar