Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:25:53.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Half-a-Million Strong: The Emergency Medical Services Response to a Single-Day, Mass-Gathering Event

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Abstract

Introduction:

Emergency medical services (EMS) responses to mass gatherings have been described frequently, but there are few reports describing the response to a single-day gathering of large magnitude.

Objective:

This report describes the EMS response to the largest single-day, ticketed concert held in North America: the 2003 “Toronto Rocks!” Rolling Stones Concert.

Methods:

Medical care was provided by paramedics, physicians, and nurses. Care sites included ambulances, medically equipped, all-terrain vehicles, bicycle paramedic units, first-aid tents, and a 124-bed medical facility that included a field hospital and a rehydration unit. Records from the first-aid tents, ambulances, paramedic teams, and rehydration unit were obtained. Data abstracted included patient demographics, chief complaint, time of incident, treatment, and disposition.

Results:

More than 450,000 people attended the concert and 1,870 sought medical care (42/10,000 attendees). No record was kept for the 665 attendees simply requesting water, sunscreen, or bandages. Of the remaining 1,205 patients, the average of the ages was 28 ±11 years, and 61% were female. Seven-hundred, ninety-five patients (66%) were cared for at one of the first-aid tents. Physicians at the tents assisted in patient management and disposition when crowds restricted ambulance movement. Common complaints included headache (321 patients; 27%), heat-related complaints (148; 12%), nausea or vomiting (91; 7.6%), musculoskeletal complaints (83; 6.9%), and breathing problems (79; 6.6%). Peak activity occurred between 14:00 and 19:00 hours, when 102 patients per hour sought medical attention. Twenty-four patients (0.5/10,000) were transferred to off-site hospitals.

Conclusions:

This report on the EMS response, outcomes, and role of the physicians at a large single-day mass gathering may assist EMS planners at future events.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Milsten, AM, Maguire, BJ, Bissell, RA, Seaman, KG: Mass-gathering medical care:A review of the literature. Prehosp Disast Med 2002;17:151162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Arbon, P, Bridgewater, FHG, Smith, C: Mass gathering medicine: A predictive model for patient presentation and transport rates. Prehosp Disast Med 2001;16:150158.10.1017/S1049023X00025905Google Scholar
3.Grange, JT, Green, SM, Downs, M: Concert medicine: Spectrum of medical problems encountered at 405 major concerts. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6:202207.10.1111/j.1553-2712.1999.tb00156.xGoogle Scholar
4.Parrillo, S: Medical Care of Mass Gatherings. In: Hogan, DE, Burstein, JL (eds), Disaster Medicine. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2002, pp 274278.Google Scholar
5.Lukins, JL, Feldman, MJ, Verbeek, PR, Summers, J: A paramedic-staffed medical rehydration unit at a mass gathering. Prehosp Emerg Care 2004. (In press).Google Scholar
6.Janchar, T, Samaddar, C., Milzman, D: The mosh pit experience: Emergency medical care for concert injuries. Am J Emerg Med 2000;18:6263.Google Scholar
7.Erickson, TB, Aks, SE, Koenigsberg, M, et al. : Drug use patterns at major rock concert events. Ann Emerg Med 1996;28:2226.10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70133-6Google Scholar
8.Fromm, RE, Filbin, M, Vutpakdi, K, Varon, J: Critical illnesses at mass gatherings are uncommon events. Chest 1998;114:339S. Abstract.Google Scholar
9.Grange, JT, Baumann, GW, Vaezazizi, R: On-site physicians reduce ambulance transports at mass gatherings. Prehosp Emerg Care 2003;7:322326.Google Scholar