Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:03:19.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predicting reattendance at a high-risk breast cancer clinic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2015

Sarah R. Ormseth Open the ORCID record for Sarah R. Ormseth [Opens in a new window] ,
David K. Wellisch ,
Adam E. Aréchiga  and
Taylor L. Draper
Sarah R. Ormseth
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
David K. Wellisch*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
Adam E. Aréchiga
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
Taylor L. Draper
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: David K. Wellisch, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 760 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90024-1759. E-Mail: dwellisch@mednet.ucla.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

The research about follow-up patterns of women attending high-risk breast-cancer clinics is sparse. This study sought to profile daughters of breast-cancer patients who are likely to return versus those unlikely to return for follow-up care in a high-risk clinic.

Method:

Our investigation included 131 patients attending the UCLA Revlon Breast Center High Risk Clinic. Predictor variables included age, computed breast-cancer risk, participants' perceived personal risk, clinically significant depressive symptomatology (CES–D score ≥ 16), current level of anxiety (State–Trait Anxiety Inventory), and survival status of participants' mothers (survived or passed away from breast cancer).

Results:

A greater likelihood of reattendance was associated with older age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.07, p = 0.004), computed breast-cancer risk (AOR = 1.10, p = 0.017), absence of depressive symptomatology (AOR = 0.25, p = 0.009), past psychiatric diagnosis (AOR = 3.14, p = 0.029), and maternal loss to breast cancer (AOR = 2.59, p = 0.034). Also, an interaction was found between mother's survival and perceived risk (p = 0.019), such that reattendance was associated with higher perceived risk among participants whose mothers survived (AOR = 1.04, p = 0.002), but not those whose mothers died (AOR = 0.99, p = 0.685). Furthermore, a nonlinear inverted “U” relationship was observed between state anxiety and reattendance (p = 0.037); participants with moderate anxiety were more likely to reattend than those with low or high anxiety levels.

Significance of Results:

Demographic, medical, and psychosocial factors were found to be independently associated with reattendance to a high-risk breast-cancer clinic. Explication of the profiles of women who may or may not reattend may serve to inform the development and implementation of interventions to increase the likelihood of follow-up care.

Keywords

Breast neoplasmsGenetic predisposition to diseaseMother–child relationshipEarly detection of cancerPatient compliance
Type
Original Articles
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 1441 - 1448
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aiken, L.S. & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Bulliard, J.L., de Landtsheer, J.P. & Levi, F. (2003). Results from the Swiss mammography screening pilot programme. European Journal of Cancer, 39(12), 1761–1769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cockburn, J., Schofield, P., White, V., et al. (1997). Predictors of returning for second round screening at a population based mammographic screening programme in Melbourne, Australia. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 51(1), 62–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consedine, N.S., Magai, C., Krivoshekova, Y.S., et al. (2004). Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: A critical review. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 13(4), 501–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diefenbach, M.A., Miller, S.M. & Daly, M.B. (1999). Specific worry about breast cancer predicts mammography use in women at risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 18(5), 532–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, K.M. & Phillips, K. (2007). Management of women at high familial risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Cancer Forum, 31(3), 141–149.Google Scholar
Fink, R., Shapiro, S. & Roester, R. (1972). Impact of efforts to increase participation in repetitive screenings for early breast cancer detection. American Journal of Public Health, 62(3), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gail, M.H., Brinton, L.A., Byar, D.P., et al. (1989). Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 81(24), 1879–1886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hailey, B.J. (1991). Family history of breast cancer and screening behavior: An inverted U-shaped curve? Medical Hypotheses, 36(4), 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hailey, B.J., Carter, C.L. & Burnett, D.R. (2000). Breast cancer attitudes, knowledge, and screening behavior in women with and without a family history of breast cancer. Health Care for Women International, 21(8), 701–715.Google ScholarPubMed
Hopwood, P., Keeling, F., Long, A., et al. (1998). Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: Some preliminary indicators. Psycho-Oncology, 7(5), 402–412.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacs, C., Peshkin, B.N., Schwartz, M., et al. (2002). Breast and ovarian cancer screening practices in healthy women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 71(2), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kash, K.M., Holland, J.C., Halper, M.S., et al. (1992). Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 84(1), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katapodi, M.C., Lee, K.A., Facione, N.C., et al. (2004). Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine, 38(4), 388–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendler, K.S., Karkowski, L.M. & Prescott, C.A. (1999). Causal relationship between stressful life events and the onset of major depression. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(6), 837–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuschel, B., Lux, M., Goecke, T., et al. (2000). Prevention and therapy for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 9(3), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerman, C., Rimer, B., Trock, B., et al. (1990). Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Preventive Medicine, 19(3), 279–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerman, C., Daly, M., Sands, C., et al. (1993). Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 85(13), 1074–1080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lerman, C., Kash, K. & Stefanek, M. (1994). Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: Perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, (16), 171–176.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, N.M. & Wellisch, D. (2001). Anxiety and compliance among women at high risk for breast cancer. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23(4), 298–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, W. & Degner, L. (2006). Perception of risk and surveillance practices of women with a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Nursing, 29(3), 227–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaul, K.D., Schroeder, D.M. & Reid, P.A. (1996). Breast cancer worry and screening: Some prospective data. Health Psychology, 15(6), 430–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCaul, K.D., Branstetter, A.D., O'Donnell, S.M., et al. (1998). A descriptive study of breast cancer worry. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21(6), 565–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meiser, B., Butow, P., Barratt, A., et al. (2000). Breast cancer screening uptake in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 59(2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pakenham, K.I., Pruss, M. & Clutton, S. (2000). The utility of socio-demographics, knowledge and health belief model variables in predicting reattendance for mammography screening: A brief report. Psychology & Health, 15(5), 585–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M.A., Butow, P.N., Charles, M., et al. (2010). Predictors of breast cancer screening behavior in women with a strong family history of the disease. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 124(2), 509–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radloff, L.S. (1977). The CES–D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahman, S.M., Dignan, M.B. & Shelton, B.J. (2005). A theory-based model for predicting adherence to guidelines for screening mammography among women age 40 and older. International Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2(3), 169–179.Google ScholarPubMed
Sheinfeld-Gorin, S. & Albert, S.M. (2003). The meaning of risk to first-degree relatives of women with breast cancer. Women & Health, 37(3), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L. & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Tatla, R., Paszat, L., Bondy, S., et al. (2003). Socioeconomic status and returning for a second screen in the Ontario breast screening program. Breast, 12(4), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, V.M., Taplin, S.H., Urban, N., et al. (1995). Repeat mammography use among women ages 50–75. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 4(4), 409–413.Google ScholarPubMed
Tracy, K.A., Quillin, J.M., Wilson, D.B., et al. (2008). The impact of family history of breast cancer and cancer death on women's mammography practices and beliefs. Genetics in Medicine, 10(8), 621–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, M.J., Chiarelli, A.M., Knight, J.A., et al. (2013). Perceived risk and adherence to breast cancer screening guidelines among women with a familial history of breast cancer: A review of the literature. Breast, 22(4), 395–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wellisch, D.K. & Lindberg, N.M. (2001). A psychological profile of depressed and nondepressed women at high risk for breast cancer. Psychosomatics, 42(4), 330–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L.R., Chiarelli, A.M., Glendon, G., et al. (2011). Influence of perceived breast cancer risk on screening behaviors of female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 20(4), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L.R., Chiarelli, A.M., Glendon, G., et al. (2012). Worry is good for breast cancer screening: A study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the Breast Cancer Family Registry. Journal of Cancer Epidemiology. PMCID: PMC3391896. Published online June 28, 2012. doi: 10.1155/2012/545062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed