Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:51:28.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychometric Properties of a Test for ADHD Based on Binocular Rivalry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2013

Juan Antonio Amador-Campos*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Manuel Moreno-Sánchez
Affiliation:
Universidad de Barcelona (Spain)
Antonio Medina-Peña
Affiliation:
Colegio Salesiano Sant Domènec Savio, Badalona (Spain)
Juan Jairo Ortiz-Guerra
Affiliation:
Hospital de Sant Joan de Déu (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Juan Antonio Amador Campos. Departamento de Personalidad, Evaluación y Tratamiento Psicológicos. Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Barcelona. Passeig Vall d’Hebron, 171. 08035. Barcelona (Spain). Phone: +34-933125131. E-mail: jamador@ub.edu

Abstract

The psychometric properties of a Binocular Rivalry (BR)-based test on a group of 159 participants (57 with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADHD) aged between 6 and 15 years are presented. Two factors, which explained 56.82% of the variance, were obtained by exploratory factor analysis: (a) Alternations and Duration of exclusive dominances, and (b) Decision time. Reliability was excellent (Cronbach’s α = .834 and .884). The ADHD group showed fewer alternations and longer duration of dominances and decision time than the control group. Correlations between measures of BR, IQ, working memory, and processing speed of the WISC-IV, and ADHD symptoms, assessed by parents and teachers, ranged between low and medium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was financed by a grant of the Alicia Koplowitz Foundation, in the year 2009.

References

Adams, Z. W., Derefinko, K. J., Milich, R., & Fillmore, M. T. (2008). Inhibitory functioning across ADHD subtypes: Recent findings, clinical implications, and future directions. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 14, 268275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ddrr.37 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aksan, N., & Kochanska, G. (2004). Links between systems of inhibition from infancy to preschool years. Child Development, 75, 14771490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00752.x Google Scholar
Alais, D., & Blake, R. (2005). Binocular rivalry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Amador-Campos, J. A., Forns-Santacana, M., Martorell-Balanzó, B., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Peró-Cebollero, M. (2005). Confirmatory factor analysis of parents’ and teachers’ ratings of DSM-IV symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a Spanish sample. Psychological Reports, 97, 847860. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.3.847-860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association, (2002). DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders [DSM-IV-TR. Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales] Rev. ed. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
Aznar-Casanova, J. A. (2010). Test for the Assessment of the Attention-Deficit by Perceptual Rivalry. Register of intellectual property n° B-1055–10 (Spain).Google Scholar
Barkley, R. A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Barkley, R. A., & Murphy, K. R. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders. A clinical workbook (3 rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Blake, R. (2001). A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain and Mind, 2, 538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1017925416289 Google Scholar
Conners, C. K. (1997). Conners’ Rating Scales-Revised. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Diamond, A. (2005). Attention-deficit disorder (attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder without hyperactivity): A neurobiologically and behaviorally distinct disorder from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (with hyperactivity). Development and Psychopathology, 17, 807825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050388 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fillmore, M. T., Milich, R., & Lorch, E. P. (2009). Inhibitory deficits in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Intentional versus automatic mechanisms of attention. Development and Psychopathology 21, 539554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409000297 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glass, L. A., Ryan, J. J., Bartels, J. M., & Morris, J. (2008). Estimating WISC-IV indexes: Proration versus linear scaling. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 11751180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20518 Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H.von. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik [Treatise on Physiological Optics] . Leipzig, Germany: Voss.Google Scholar
Huang-Pollock, C. L., & Nigg, J. T. (2003). Searching for the attention deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: The case of visuospatial orienting. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 801830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(03)00073-4 Google Scholar
Jollifre, I. T. (1986). Principal component analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75, 13571372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00745.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luna, B., Velanova, K., & Geier, C. F. (2008). Development and eye-movement control. Brain and Cognition, 68, 293308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.019 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marzi, C. A. (1999). Neuropsychology of attention. In Denes, G. & Luigi, P. (Eds.), Handbook of clinical and experimental neuropsychology (pp. 509524). Hove, UK: Psychology Press/Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/4.7.2 Google Scholar
Milich, R., Balentine, A. C., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). ADHD combined type and ADHD predominantly inattentive type are distinct and unrelated disorders. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8, 463488. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.8.4.463 Google Scholar
Rommelse, N. N. J., Van der Stigchel, S., & Sergeant, J. A. (2008). A review on eye movement studies in childhood and adolescent psychiatry. Brain and Cognition, 68, 391414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.025 Google Scholar
Russell, D. W. (2002). In search of underlying dimensions: The use (and abuse) of factor analysis in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 16291646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014616702237645 Google Scholar
Swaab-Barneveld, H., de Sonneville, L., Cohen-Kettenis, P., Gielen, A., Buitelaar, J., & van Engeland, H. (2000). Visual sustained attention in a child psychiatric population. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 651659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200005000-00020 Google Scholar
Tillman, C. M., Thorell, L. B., Brocki, K. C., & Bohlin, G. (2007). Motor response inhibition and execution in the stop-signal task: Development and relation to ADHD behaviors. Child Neuropsychology, 14, 4259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09297040701249020 Google Scholar
Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003 Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2003). WISC-IV. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th Ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment. [Spanish adaptation: Escala de inteligencia de Wechsler para niños, 4ª edición: WISC-IV. Madrid, Spain: TEA, 2005] Google Scholar