Abstract
The introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops and foods into Europe has generated considerable controversy. Despite a risk assessment system that is intended to beprecautionary in nature, the decisions thathave been taken have not gathered publicconfidence. Key attributes of a precautionaryappraisal system include humility,completeness, assessing benefits andjustifications, making comparisons, allowingfor public participation, transparency,diversity, and the ``mapping'' of alternativeviews rather than the prescription of singlesolutions. A comparison of the European GMregulatory system with a different (moreprecautionary) approach using a ``multi-criteriamapping'' technique reveals a number ofproblems. These include the narrow framing ofthe established risk assessment system (therebyexcluding many issues of public concern), alack of public involvement in the process, anda failure to include appropriate comparisons ora diversity of options. Recent changes to theEuropean regulatory system only go part of theway to addressing these issues. Furthercontroversy may therefore be expected. However,practical ways of undertaking a morebroad-based precautionary approach are nowavailable (including the multi-criteria mappingmethod). These new approaches to technologyassessment offer a means for decision making toearn greater public confidence in this complexand difficult area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
CEC,Promoting the Competitive Environment for the Industrial Activities Based on Biotechnology within the Community. Commission Communication to Parliament and the Council. CEC (19) 629 final (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1991).
European Commission, Communication on the Precautionary Principle, COM(2000)1 (European Commission, Brussels, 2000).
Fisher, E. and R. Harding, Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle (Federation Press, Sydney, 1999).
Levidow, L., “Biotechnology Regulation as Symbolic Normalisation,” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 6(3) (1994), 273–288.
Levidow, L., “Regulating GMO Releases: Britain's Precautionary Dilemmas,” Natures-Sciences-Societies 4(2) (1996), 131–143.
Levidow, L. and S. Carr, “UK: Precautionary Commercialisation?” Journal of Risk Research 3(3) (2000), 261–270.
Levidow, L., S. Carr, R. von Schomberg, and D. Wield, “Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe: Harmonisation Difficulties, Opportunities, Dilemmas,” Science and Public Policy 23(3) (1996), 135–157.
Lex, M., “Promoting the Competitiveness of Biotechnology in Europe,” Trends in Biotechnology 13 (1995), 39–40.
Millstone, E., E. Brunner, and S. Mayer, “Beyond 'substantial Equivalence',” Nature 401 (1999), 525–526.
National Research Council, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society (National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1996).
O'Riordan, T and J. Cameron, Interpreting the Precautionary Principle (Earthscan, London, 1994).
Raffensberger, C. and J. Tickner, Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle (Island Press, Washington, DC, 1999).
Stirling, A., “Risk at a Turning Point?” Journal of Risk Research 1(2) (1998), 97–110.
Stirling, A., On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk. EUR 19056 EN, Volume I (IPTS, Seville, 1999a).
Stirling, A., On Precautionary and Science-Based Approaches to Risk Assessment and Environmental Appraisal, EUR 19056 EN Volume II (IPTS, Seville, 1999b).
Stirling, A and S. Mayer, Rethinking Risk: a Pilot Multi-Criteria Mapping of a Genetically Modified Crop in Agricultural Systems in the UK (SPRU, University of Sussex, UK, 1999).
Stirling, A. and S. Mayer, “Precautionary Approaches to the Appraisal of Risk: A Case Study of a Genetically Modified Crop,” International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 6 (2000), 296–311.
Stirling, A. and S. Mayer, “A Novel Approach to the Appraisal of Technological Risk: A Multi-Criteria Mapping Pilot Study of a Genetically Modified Crop in the UK,” Environment and Planning C19 (2001), 529–555.
Von Schomberg, R., An appraisal of the working in practice of directive 90/220/EEC on the deliberate release of genetically modified organisms. Working document for STOA Panel (European Parliament, Directorate General for Research, Luxembourg, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mayer, S., Stirling, A. Finding a Precautionary Approach to Technological Developments – Lessons for the Evaluation of GM Crops. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15, 57–71 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013866125341
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013866125341